• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中疑似心力衰竭调查中的血浆糖化血红蛋白:对2018年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南更新的审核

Plasma HbA1c in the investigation of suspected heart failure in general practice: An audit of the 2018 NICE guidelines update.

作者信息

Paschalis Theodoros, Jones Carol

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.

Department of General Practice, Creffield Medical Group, Colchester, UK.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):1098-1102. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_917_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_917_19
PMID:32318474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7114051/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is a known risk factor for heart failure (HF); nevertheless, many HF patients remain undiagnosed. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England updated their HF guidelines in 2018, replacing the use of fasting plasma glucose with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), in suspected HF investigation. This audit aimed to assess this update's uptake at a general practice partnership in Colchester, England.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The audit cycle consisted of a two-round electronic record search, for approximately 29,000 patients registered at the partnership. From November 1, 2017 to November 1, 2018 for the first round and from November 1, 2018 to March 6, 2019 for the second round, patients who had their NT pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels measured for the initial investigation of suspected HF were included in the study. Interventions put in place after the first round included an oral presentation and an illustrated guide for the general practitioners (GPs).

RESULTS

One hundred and ten patients, 19 in cycle 1 and 91 in cycle 2, were identified and included in the analysis. At the first round, only 31.6% of the patients had their HbA1c level measured, while 36.8% had no diabetic investigation done. At the second round, the percentage of patients who had their HbA1c level assessed increased to 59.3%. A decrease from 36.8% of patients without diabetic status assessment to 20% was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of awareness among GPs regarding this guideline update was identified and simple interventions achieved an increase in the guideline's uptake. Regular and complete audit cycles can help GPs adhere to up-to-date guidelines. Primary care can help other organizations such as pathology laboratories keep up to date with guidelines, while primary care technology can be amended in-house to help adherence to new guidelines. We recommend the National UK Heart Failure Audit considers auditing the use of HbA1c testing in inpatients investigated for new HF.

摘要

引言

糖尿病是已知的心力衰竭(HF)风险因素;然而,许多HF患者仍未被诊断出来。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所于2018年更新了其HF指南,在疑似HF调查中用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)取代了空腹血糖的检测。本次审核旨在评估英国科尔切斯特一家全科医疗合作伙伴对此更新内容的采用情况。

材料与方法

审核周期包括两轮电子记录搜索,涉及该合作伙伴登记的约29,000名患者。第一轮为2017年11月1日至2018年11月1日,第二轮为2018年11月1日至2019年3月6日,对因疑似HF进行初步调查而检测N末端脑钠肽前体水平的患者纳入研究。第一轮后采取的干预措施包括为全科医生(GP)进行口头报告和提供图文指南。

结果

共识别出110名患者,其中第1周期19名,第2周期91名,并纳入分析。在第一轮时,仅31.6%的患者检测了HbA1c水平,而36.8%的患者未进行糖尿病相关检查。在第二轮时,检测HbA1c水平的患者百分比增至59.3%。未进行糖尿病状态评估的患者比例从36.8%降至20%。

结论

发现全科医生对该指南更新缺乏认识,简单的干预措施使指南采用率有所提高。定期且完整的审核周期有助于全科医生遵循最新指南。初级保健可帮助其他机构(如病理实验室)跟上指南更新,同时可在内部修改初级保健技术以帮助遵循新指南。我们建议英国国家心力衰竭审核考虑对因新发HF接受调查的住院患者中HbA1c检测的使用情况进行审核。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f15f/7114051/6c0ee0070d02/JFMPC-9-1098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f15f/7114051/6c0ee0070d02/JFMPC-9-1098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f15f/7114051/6c0ee0070d02/JFMPC-9-1098-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Plasma HbA1c in the investigation of suspected heart failure in general practice: An audit of the 2018 NICE guidelines update.基层医疗中疑似心力衰竭调查中的血浆糖化血红蛋白:对2018年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南更新的审核
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):1098-1102. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_917_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Does specialist review for patients with suspected heart failure predict better outcomes? An observational study on the utility of compliance with NICE guidelines.对疑似心力衰竭患者进行专科评估是否能预测更好的预后?一项关于遵循英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南效用的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):e021856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021856.
3
Machine learning optimization of an electronic health record audit for heart failure in primary care.机器学习优化初级保健中心心力衰竭电子健康记录审核。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):39-47. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13724. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
4
Impact of an extended audit on identifying heart failure patients in general practice: baseline results of the OSCAR-HF pilot study.拓展审计对在全科医疗中识别心力衰竭患者的影响:OSCAR-HF 试点研究的基线结果
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;7(6):3950-3961. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12990. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
5
Optimising standards of care of heart failure in general practice the OSCAR-HF pilot study protocol.优化基层医疗中心心力衰竭护理标准:OSCAR-HF试点研究方案
Acta Cardiol. 2019 Oct;74(5):371-379. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1507426. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
6
Routes to diagnosis of heart failure: observational study using linked data in England.心力衰竭的诊断途径:英国使用关联数据的观察性研究。
Heart. 2018 Apr;104(7):600-605. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312183. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
7
A cost effectiveness study establishing the impact and accuracy of implementing the NICE guidelines lowering plasma NTproBNP threshold in patients with clinically suspected heart failure at our institution.一项成本效益研究,旨在评估在我院疑似心力衰竭患者中实施 NICE 指南降低血浆 NTproBNP 阈值的影响和准确性。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 15;257:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.126.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of serum B-type natriuretic peptide testing and monitoring in patients with heart failure in primary and secondary care: an evidence synthesis, cohort study and cost-effectiveness model.在初级和二级保健中,心力衰竭患者的血清 B 型利钠肽检测和监测的有效性和成本效益:证据综合、队列研究和成本效益模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Aug;21(40):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta21400.
9
Real-world presentation with heart failure in primary care: do patients selected to follow diagnostic and management guidelines have better outcomes?基层医疗中伴有心力衰竭的真实病例表现:遵循诊断和管理指南的患者是否有更好的治疗结果?
Open Heart. 2018 Nov 10;5(2):e000935. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000935. eCollection 2018.
10
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of guidelines from health technology assessment organizations in community-based primary care: a systematic mixed studies review.基于社区的初级保健中卫生技术评估组织指南的结果:系统混合研究综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 14;40(1):e56. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000370.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting adults likely to develop heart failure using readily available clinical information: An analysis of heart failure incidence using the NHEFS.利用易得的临床信息预测易患心力衰竭的成年人:利用 NHEFS 进行心力衰竭发病率分析。
Prev Med. 2020 Jan;130:105878. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105878. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
2
Combinations of cardiac and non-cardiac predictors for prognoses in patients with acute heart failure.急性心力衰竭患者预后的心脏和非心脏预测因素组合
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Jan 25;7(1):83-96. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz059.
3
Glycated Hemoglobin and Outcomes of Heart Failure (from Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure).
糖化血红蛋白与心力衰竭结局(来自 Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 15;123(4):618-626. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
Use of audit, feedback and education increased guideline implementation in a multidisciplinary stroke unit.在多学科卒中单元中,使用审核、反馈和教育可提高指南的实施率。
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Nov 6;6(2):e000212. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000212. eCollection 2017.
5
Heart failure: preventing disease and death worldwide.心力衰竭:全球范围内预防疾病与死亡
ESC Heart Fail. 2014 Sep;1(1):4-25. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12005.
6
Discordance in the diagnosis of diabetes: Comparison between HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose.糖尿病诊断中的不一致性:糖化血红蛋白与空腹血糖的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0182192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182192. eCollection 2017.
7
More patients are surviving heart failure, audit finds.
BMJ. 2017 Aug 10;358:j3860. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3860.
8
Prognostic Impact of Diabetes and Prediabetes on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the GISSI-HF (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nella Insufficienza Cardiaca-Heart Failure) Trial.糖尿病和糖尿病前期对慢性心力衰竭患者生存结局的预后影响:GISSI-HF(意大利心力衰竭生存研究组)试验的事后分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 5;6(7):e005156. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005156.
9
Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure.糖尿病与心力衰竭
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1S):S37-S47. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 30.
10
An audit of adherence to heart failure guidelines in an Australian hospital: A pharmacist perspective.澳大利亚一家医院心力衰竭指南依从性审计:药剂师视角
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1195-1202. doi: 10.1111/jep.12760. Epub 2017 May 17.