Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08722-5.
Examining various problems after disasters is important for the affected people. Managing humanitarian aid and donations among the affected people is considered as one of the most important problems after disasters. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the challenges and barriers of humanitarian aid management in 2017 Kermanshah Earthquake.
This study was conducted from November 2017 to January 2018, with qualitative case study design. The population included 21 people including 6 humanitarian aid manager, 6 volunteers, 4 aid workers, and 5 affected people. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and purposeful sampling, which continued until saturating the data. The strategies recommended by Guba were used for evaluating the trustworthiness of the data. The data was analyzed with conventional content analysis method according to method suggested by Graneheim and Lundman.
Based on the results, two themes, nine categories, and 19 sub-categories were identified considering the challenges and barriers of humanitarian aid and donors' management during the 2017 Kermanshah Earthquake. The categories included education, command and coordination, communication and information, rules, security, traffic and overcrowding, assessment, providing system, and cultural setting. Also, two themes including managerial and structural barriers were extracted.
Adopting an effective management and appropriate policies with respect to humanitarian aid and modifying structural and managerial barriers can improve the performance and management of humanitarian aid.
灾难后检查各种问题对于受灾人群很重要。管理受灾人群中的人道主义援助和捐赠被认为是灾难后最重要的问题之一。因此,本研究旨在评估 2017 年克尔曼沙阿地震中人道主义援助管理的挑战和障碍。
本研究于 2017 年 11 月至 2018 年 1 月进行,采用定性案例研究设计。研究对象包括 21 人,包括 6 名人道主义援助管理人员、6 名志愿者、4 名援助工作者和 5 名受灾者。数据收集采用半结构化访谈和目的性抽样,直到数据饱和。采用 Guba 推荐的策略评估数据的可信度。采用 Graneheim 和 Lundman 建议的常规内容分析方法对数据进行分析。
根据研究结果,考虑到 2017 年克尔曼沙阿地震期间人道主义援助和捐赠者管理的挑战和障碍,确定了两个主题、九个类别和 19 个亚类。类别包括教育、指挥与协调、沟通与信息、规则、安全、交通与过度拥挤、评估、提供系统和文化背景。此外,还提取了两个主题,包括管理和结构障碍。
采取有效的管理和适当的人道主义援助政策,修改结构和管理障碍,可以提高人道主义援助的绩效和管理。