• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲国家多病共存人群的综合护理计划:卫生系统中的电子健康采用。

Integrated Care Programs for People with Multimorbidity in European Countries: eHealth Adoption in Health Systems.

机构信息

Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 8;2020:9025326. doi: 10.1155/2020/9025326. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/9025326
PMID:32337283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7168691/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

eHealth applications have the potential to provide new integrated care services to patients with multimorbidity (MM), also supporting multidisciplinary care. The aim of this paper is to explore how widely eHealth tools have been currently adopted in integrated care programs for (older) people with MM in European countries, including benefits and barriers concerning their adoption, according to some basic health system characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2014, in the framework of the ICARE4EU project, expert organizations in 24 European countries identified 101 integrated care programs. Managers of the selected programs completed an online questionnaire on several dimensions, including the use of eHealth. We analyzed data from this questionnaire, in addition to qualitative information from six innovative programs which were studied in depth through case study methodology, according to characteristics of national health systems: a national health model (financing system), overall strength of primary care (PC) (structure/service delivery process), and level of (de)centralization of health system (executive powers in a country).

RESULTS

85 programs (out of 101) adopted at least one eHealth tool, and 42 of these targeted explicitly older people. In most cases, Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were used and some benefits emerged like improved care management and integration, although inadequate funding mechanisms represented a major barrier. The analysis by health system characteristics showed a greater adoption of eHealth applications in decentralized countries, in countries with a National Health Service (NHS) model, and in countries with a strong/medium level of PC development.

CONCLUSIONS

Although in the light of some limitations, findings indicate a relation between implementation of care programs using eHealth tools and basic characteristics of health systems, with decentralization of a health system, NHS model, and strong/medium PC having a key role. However adaptations of European health systems seem necessary, in order to provide a more innovative and integrated care.

摘要

简介

电子健康应用程序有可能为患有多种疾病(MM)的患者提供新的综合护理服务,同时也支持多学科护理。本文的目的是探索在欧洲国家,电子健康工具在针对患有多种疾病(MM)的(老年)人群的综合护理计划中目前的采用程度如何,包括根据一些基本的卫生系统特征,采用这些工具的益处和障碍。

材料和方法

在 2014 年,在 ICARE4EU 项目的框架内,24 个欧洲国家的专家组织确定了 101 个综合护理计划。选定计划的管理人员完成了一份在线问卷,涵盖了几个方面,包括电子健康的使用。我们分析了这份问卷的数据,此外还分析了通过案例研究方法深入研究的六个创新计划的定性信息,这些计划的信息是根据国家卫生系统的特点得出的:国家卫生模式(融资系统)、初级保健(PC)的整体实力(结构/服务提供过程)以及卫生系统的去中心化程度(国家的行政权力)。

结果

85 个计划(101 个中的 85 个)采用了至少一种电子健康工具,其中 42 个计划专门针对老年人。在大多数情况下,使用了电子健康记录(EHR),并且出现了一些益处,例如改善了护理管理和整合,尽管资金不足的机制是一个主要障碍。通过卫生系统特征的分析表明,在去中心化的国家、采用国民健康服务(NHS)模式的国家和具有强大/中等水平的 PC 发展的国家,电子健康应用的采用率更高。

结论

尽管存在一些限制,但研究结果表明,电子健康工具的使用与卫生系统的基本特征之间存在关系,卫生系统的去中心化、NHS 模式以及强大/中等水平的 PC 发挥着关键作用。然而,为了提供更具创新性和综合性的护理,似乎有必要对欧洲卫生系统进行调整。

相似文献

1
Integrated Care Programs for People with Multimorbidity in European Countries: eHealth Adoption in Health Systems.欧洲国家多病共存人群的综合护理计划:卫生系统中的电子健康采用。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 8;2020:9025326. doi: 10.1155/2020/9025326. eCollection 2020.
2
eHealth in integrated care programs for people with multimorbidity in Europe: Insights from the ICARE4EU project.电子健康在欧洲多病种共病患者整合照护方案中的应用:来自 ICARE4EU 项目的洞见。
Health Policy. 2018 Jan;122(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
3
eHealth for people with multimorbidity: Results from the ICARE4EU project and insights from the "10 e's" by Gunther Eysenbach.多病共存人群的电子健康:ICARE4EU 项目的结果及 Gunther Eysenbach 的“10 e's”的见解
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0207292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207292. eCollection 2018.
4
Patient-centeredness of integrated care programs for people with multimorbidity. Results from the European ICARE4EU project.以患者为中心的多病种综合护理方案。欧洲 ICARE4EU 项目的研究结果。
Health Policy. 2018 Jan;122(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
5
Electronic Health Use in the European Union and the Effect of Multimorbidity: Cross-Sectional Survey.欧盟电子健康的使用及多重疾病的影响:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 3;20(5):e165. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7299.
6
National Health Models and the Adoption of E-Health and E-Prescribing in Primary Care - New Evidence from Europe.国家卫生模式与基层医疗中电子健康和电子处方的采用——来自欧洲的新证据。
J Innov Health Inform. 2015 Nov 25;22(4):399-408. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v22i4.97.
7
Lessons Learned From a Living Lab on the Broad Adoption of eHealth in Primary Health Care.从一个关于电子健康在初级卫生保健中广泛应用的生活实验室中汲取的经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 29;20(3):e83. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9110.
8
A multimethod study of NHS 111 online.NHS111 在线的多方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(5):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTRR9821.
9
The Palliative Care Challenge: Analysis of Barriers and Opportunities to Integrate Palliative Care in Europe in the View of National Associations.姑息治疗挑战:从各国协会视角分析欧洲姑息治疗整合的障碍与机遇
J Palliat Med. 2017 Nov;20(11):1195-1204. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0039. Epub 2017 May 16.
10
Perspectives of Policy Makers and Service Users Concerning the Implementation of eHealth in Sweden: Interview Study.政策制定者和服务使用者对瑞典电子健康实施的看法:访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 28;24(1):e28870. doi: 10.2196/28870.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators, barriers, and recommendations for the implementation of a digital-based case management program: the perspective of Portuguese stakeholders.基于数字技术的病例管理项目实施的促进因素、障碍及建议:葡萄牙利益相关者的视角
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12445-x.
2
Effectiveness of eHealth literacy interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies.电子健康素养干预措施的有效性:对实验研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21354-x.
3
Technology acceptance of the video game-based swallowing function training system among healthcare providers and dysphagia patients: A qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring multimorbidity in older adults: comparing different data sources.测量老年人的多病共存:比较不同的数据来源。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1173-4.
2
The Evidence Base for an Ideal Care Pathway for Frail Multimorbid Elderly: Combined Scoping and Systematic Intervention Review.虚弱多病老年人理想护理路径的证据基础:综合范围界定与系统干预综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 22;21(4):e12517. doi: 10.2196/12517.
3
What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address? Insights From an International Scoping Review.
医疗保健提供者和吞咽困难患者对基于视频游戏的吞咽功能训练系统的技术接受度:一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 1;10:20552076241284830. doi: 10.1177/20552076241284830. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Care models for individuals with chronic multimorbidity: lessons for low- and middle-income countries.慢性多病共存患者的照护模式:对中低收入国家的启示。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11351-y.
5
Prescription Precision: A Comprehensive Review of Intelligent Prescription Systems.**处方精准度**:智能处方系统全面综述
Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(34):2671-2684. doi: 10.2174/0113816128321623240719104337.
6
Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review.映射影响数字疗法在医疗体系内采用的因素:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 25;25:e48000. doi: 10.2196/48000.
7
Changes in Barriers That Cause Unmet Healthcare Needs in the Life Cycle of Adulthood and Their Policy Implications: A Need-Selection Model Analysis of the Korea Health Panel Survey Data.成年期生命周期中导致未满足医疗需求的障碍变化及其政策影响:基于韩国健康面板调查数据的需求选择模型分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 9;10(11):2243. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112243.
8
Characteristics Associated With Financial or Non-financial Barriers to Healthcare in a Universal Health Insurance System: A Longitudinal Analysis of Korea Health Panel Survey Data.在全民健康保险制度下,与医疗保健的财务或非财务障碍相关的特征:对韩国健康面板调查数据的纵向分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;10:828318. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.828318. eCollection 2022.
9
Sixteen years of eHealth experiences in Iran: a qualitative content analysis of national policies.十六年来伊朗的电子健康经验:国家政策的定性内容分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00795-x.
10
eHealth Literacy: From Theory to Clinical Application for Digital Health Improvement. Results from the ACCESS Training Experience.电子健康素养:从理论到临床应用,提升数字健康水平。ACCESS 培训经验的成果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 10;18(22):11800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211800.
健康的责任创新应解决哪些卫生系统挑战?来自国际范围界定审查的见解。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Feb 1;8(2):63-75. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.110.
4
Multimorbidity, eHealth and implications for equity: a cross-sectional survey of patient perspectives on eHealth.多病共存、电子健康及其对公平性的影响:一项基于患者视角的电子健康状况横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 12;9(2):e023731. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023731.
5
Coordinating primary care services: A case of policy layering.协调初级保健服务:政策层叠的案例。
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
eHealth for people with multimorbidity: Results from the ICARE4EU project and insights from the "10 e's" by Gunther Eysenbach.多病共存人群的电子健康:ICARE4EU 项目的结果及 Gunther Eysenbach 的“10 e's”的见解
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0207292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207292. eCollection 2018.
7
How primary health care can make universal health coverage a reality, ensure healthy lives, and promote wellbeing for all.初级卫生保健如何才能实现全民健康覆盖,确保所有人享有健康生活并促进福祉。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 20;392(10156):1372-1374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32482-6.
8
Transforming primary care: scoping review of research and practice.转变初级医疗服务:研究与实践的范围综述
J Integr Care (Brighton). 2018;26(3):176-188. doi: 10.1108/JICA-03-2018-0023.
9
Frameworks for self-management support for chronic disease: a cross-country comparative document analysis.慢性病自我管理支持框架:一项跨国比较文献分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 25;18(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3387-0.
10
Using information communication technology in models of integrated community-based primary health care: learning from the iCOACH case studies.在基于社区的综合初级卫生保健模型中使用信息通信技术:从 iCOACH 案例研究中学习。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 26;13(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0780-3.