Silverberg J I, Lei D, Yousaf M, Janmohamed S R, Vakharia P P, Chopra R, Chavda R, Gabriel S, Patel K R, Singam V, Kantor R, Hsu Derek Y
Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Suite 2B-425, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jan;184(1):87-95. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19159. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Multiple atopic dermatitis (AD) severity scales exist, with no gold standard for use in clinical practice.
To determine the measurement properties of the Rajka-Langeland score and compare it with other clinician-reported outcomes in adults and children with AD.
We performed a prospective dermatology practice-based study using questionnaires and evaluation by a dermatologist (n = 427).
Rajka-Langeland had good concurrent validity with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (Spearman rho = 0·63), SCORing AD (SCORAD) (rho = 0·61), objective-SCORAD (rho = 0·52) and body surface area (rho = 0·51); good convergent validity with the numeric rating scale average-itch (rho = 0·60) and worst-itch (rho = 0·59), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (rho = 0·57), Dermatology Life Quality Index (rho = 0·53), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Itch Questionnaire (rho = 0·35-0·55) in adults and/or children; fair discriminant validity for patient- and physician-reported global AD severity; good responsiveness to change of severity of AD and itch; good reliability; internal consistency; with no floor or ceiling effects. Interpretability bands (3, clear/almost clear; 4-5, mild; 6-7, moderate; 8-9, severe) and minimal clinically important difference (1 point) were established.
The Rajka-Langeland score showed good construct validity, reliability, internal consistency and responsiveness in adults and children with AD.
存在多种特应性皮炎(AD)严重程度量表,临床实践中尚无金标准。
确定拉伊卡 - 兰格兰德评分的测量属性,并将其与其他临床医生报告的成人及儿童AD结局进行比较。
我们基于皮肤科实践进行了一项前瞻性研究,采用问卷调查并由皮肤科医生进行评估(n = 427)。
拉伊卡 - 兰格兰德评分与湿疹面积和严重程度指数(斯皮尔曼相关系数rho = 0·63)、特应性皮炎评分(SCORAD)(rho = 0·61)、客观SCORAD(rho = 0·52)和体表面积(rho = 0·51)具有良好的同时效度;与数字评定量表平均瘙痒程度(rho = 0·60)和最严重瘙痒程度(rho = 0·59)、患者导向性湿疹测量(rho = 0·57)、皮肤病生活质量指数(rho = 0·53)、患者报告结局测量信息系统瘙痒问卷(成人和/或儿童中rho = 0·35 - 0·55)具有良好的聚合效度;对患者和医生报告的AD总体严重程度具有中等判别效度;对AD严重程度和瘙痒程度的变化具有良好的反应性;具有良好的可靠性和内部一致性;无地板效应或天花板效应。建立了解释性区间(3,清晰/几乎清晰;4 - 5,轻度;6 - 7,中度;8 - 9,重度)和最小临床重要差异(1分)。
拉伊卡 - 兰格兰德评分在成人及儿童AD患者中显示出良好的结构效度、可靠性、内部一致性和反应性。