Suppr超能文献

儿童和成人特应性皮炎患者Rajka-Langeland严重程度评分的测量属性。

Measurement properties of the Rajka-Langeland severity score in children and adults with atopic dermatitis.

作者信息

Silverberg J I, Lei D, Yousaf M, Janmohamed S R, Vakharia P P, Chopra R, Chavda R, Gabriel S, Patel K R, Singam V, Kantor R, Hsu Derek Y

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Suite 2B-425, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.

Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jan;184(1):87-95. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19159. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple atopic dermatitis (AD) severity scales exist, with no gold standard for use in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the measurement properties of the Rajka-Langeland score and compare it with other clinician-reported outcomes in adults and children with AD.

METHODS

We performed a prospective dermatology practice-based study using questionnaires and evaluation by a dermatologist (n = 427).

RESULTS

Rajka-Langeland had good concurrent validity with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (Spearman rho = 0·63), SCORing AD (SCORAD) (rho = 0·61), objective-SCORAD (rho = 0·52) and body surface area (rho = 0·51); good convergent validity with the numeric rating scale average-itch (rho = 0·60) and worst-itch (rho = 0·59), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (rho = 0·57), Dermatology Life Quality Index (rho = 0·53), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Itch Questionnaire (rho = 0·35-0·55) in adults and/or children; fair discriminant validity for patient- and physician-reported global AD severity; good responsiveness to change of severity of AD and itch; good reliability; internal consistency; with no floor or ceiling effects. Interpretability bands (3, clear/almost clear; 4-5, mild; 6-7, moderate; 8-9, severe) and minimal clinically important difference (1 point) were established.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rajka-Langeland score showed good construct validity, reliability, internal consistency and responsiveness in adults and children with AD.

摘要

背景

存在多种特应性皮炎(AD)严重程度量表,临床实践中尚无金标准。

目的

确定拉伊卡 - 兰格兰德评分的测量属性,并将其与其他临床医生报告的成人及儿童AD结局进行比较。

方法

我们基于皮肤科实践进行了一项前瞻性研究,采用问卷调查并由皮肤科医生进行评估(n = 427)。

结果

拉伊卡 - 兰格兰德评分与湿疹面积和严重程度指数(斯皮尔曼相关系数rho = 0·63)、特应性皮炎评分(SCORAD)(rho = 0·61)、客观SCORAD(rho = 0·52)和体表面积(rho = 0·51)具有良好的同时效度;与数字评定量表平均瘙痒程度(rho = 0·60)和最严重瘙痒程度(rho = 0·59)、患者导向性湿疹测量(rho = 0·57)、皮肤病生活质量指数(rho = 0·53)、患者报告结局测量信息系统瘙痒问卷(成人和/或儿童中rho = 0·35 - 0·55)具有良好的聚合效度;对患者和医生报告的AD总体严重程度具有中等判别效度;对AD严重程度和瘙痒程度的变化具有良好的反应性;具有良好的可靠性和内部一致性;无地板效应或天花板效应。建立了解释性区间(3,清晰/几乎清晰;4 - 5,轻度;6 - 7,中度;8 - 9,重度)和最小临床重要差异(1分)。

结论

拉伊卡 - 兰格兰德评分在成人及儿童AD患者中显示出良好的结构效度、可靠性、内部一致性和反应性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验