Karsten U, Stolley P, Walther I, Papsdorf G, Weber S, Conrad K, Pasternak L, Kopp J
Central Institute of Molecular Biology, Academy of Sciences of the GDR, Berlin-Buch.
Hybridoma. 1988 Dec;7(6):627-33. doi: 10.1089/hyb.1988.7.627.
As an alternative to polyethylene glycol (PEG), electric field pulses offer, in theory, fusion conditions whose parameters are better controllable. In 1985 (1) we reported on the successful generation of hybridoma clones by means of electrofusion performed in a batch-type manner similar to that usually employed with PEG, and applicable to any type of antigens. Here we summarize the results of a series of fusions performed since then in which both electric field and PEG induced fusion were directly compared. Different types of antigens were used. Electrofusion resulted in a 3.8 to 33.0 times higher yield of hybridomas per unit number of spleen cells. Moreover, hybridomas grew more vigorously after fusion and, therefore, were earlier visible. Other parameters examined revealed no differences between hybridomas generated by either method.
作为聚乙二醇(PEG)的替代方法,理论上电场脉冲提供了参数更易于控制的融合条件。1985年(1)我们报道了通过电融合成功产生杂交瘤克隆,该电融合以类似于通常用于PEG的分批方式进行,并且适用于任何类型的抗原。在这里,我们总结了从那时起进行的一系列融合的结果,其中直接比较了电场诱导融合和PEG诱导融合。使用了不同类型的抗原。电融合导致每单位脾细胞产生的杂交瘤产量提高3.8至33.0倍。此外,杂交瘤在融合后生长更旺盛,因此更早可见。检查的其他参数显示两种方法产生的杂交瘤之间没有差异。