• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

各种终末冲洗技术对弯曲根管内封闭剂渗透的效果:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。

Effectiveness of Various Final Irrigation Techniques on Sealer Penetration in Curved Roots: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 13;2020:8060489. doi: 10.1155/2020/8060489. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/8060489
PMID:32352008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7178510/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of various techniques used for final irrigation on sealer penetration in the apical one-third of curved root canals. . Sixty-five freshly extracted maxillary first molar teeth with mesiobuccal roots having more than 20° of root curvature were used. The root canals were instrumented and randomly divided into four experimental groups and one control group. In the 4 experimental groups, 3 ml of 17% EDTA followed by 3 ml of 5.25% NaOCl was delivered with the use of the following protocols: Group 1: manual dynamic activation (MDA), Group 2: sonic irrigation (SI), Group 3: passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and Group 4: conventional needle irrigation (CI). All teeth were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer labeled with fluorescent dye. Transverse sections at 2 mm and 4 mm distance from the root apex were examined with the aid of confocal laser scanning microscopy. Total percentage (%) and maximum depth (m) of sealer penetration were measured.

RESULTS

All the experimental groups exhibited significantly higher penetration rates than the control group at both sections ( < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in the penetration depth and percentage among the four experimental groups evaluated at both sections ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PUI, SI, and MDA did not significantly improve sealer penetration in the apical portion of curved root canals when compared to conventional needle irrigation.

摘要

目的

比较不同的终末冲洗技术对弯曲根管根尖 1/3 处牙胶封闭剂渗透性的影响。 . 共使用 65 颗上颌第一磨牙,颊舌向近中根有超过 20°的根管弯曲。根管预备后随机分为四组实验组和一组对照组。在 4 个实验组中,使用以下方案分别用 3ml 的 17% EDTA 和 3ml 的 5.25% NaOCl 进行冲洗:组 1:手动动力激活(MDA),组 2:超声冲洗(SI),组 3:被动超声冲洗(PUI)和组 4:常规针管冲洗(CI)。所有牙齿均用牙胶和 AH Plus 封闭剂进行根管充填,并标记荧光染料。借助共聚焦激光扫描显微镜在距根尖 2mm 和 4mm 处进行横切片检查。测量牙胶封闭剂的总渗透百分比(%)和最大渗透深度(m)。

结果

在两个横切片中,所有实验组的渗透百分率均明显高于对照组( < 0.05)。然而,在两个横切片中,四个实验组的渗透深度和百分率之间没有显著差异( > 0.05)。

结论

与常规针管冲洗相比,PUI、SI 和 MDA 并不能显著提高弯曲根管根尖 1/3 处牙胶封闭剂的渗透性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6298/7178510/717885989041/BMRI2020-8060489.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6298/7178510/717885989041/BMRI2020-8060489.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6298/7178510/717885989041/BMRI2020-8060489.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Various Final Irrigation Techniques on Sealer Penetration in Curved Roots: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.各种终末冲洗技术对弯曲根管内封闭剂渗透的效果:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 13;2020:8060489. doi: 10.1155/2020/8060489. eCollection 2020.
2
Effect of final irrigation regimen on sealer penetration in curved root canals.最终冲洗方案对弯曲根管内封闭剂渗透的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):732-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
3
Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd:YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals.1320 纳米 Nd:YAG 激光激活冲洗对弯曲根管内封闭剂渗透的影响。
J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
4
Effect of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Sealer Penetration: A Confocal Laser Microscopy Study.不同冲洗激活技术对封闭剂渗透的影响:激光共聚焦显微镜研究。
Chin J Dent Res. 2021 Jun 23;24(2):113-118. doi: 10.3290/j.cjdr.b1530507.
5
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.不同最终冲洗程序后AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA fillapex和guttaflow生物封闭根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation.使用EndoVac冲洗系统与传统根管针冲洗法时封闭剂渗透情况的比较。
J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):613-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.017. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
7
Comparison of Vibringe, EndoActivator, and needle irrigation on sealer penetration in extracted human teeth.比较 Vibringe、EndoActivator 和针管冲洗对人离体牙根管内封闭剂渗透的影响。
J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):708-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
Effect of different final irrigation solutions on dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of root canal sealer.不同终末冲洗液对牙本质小管渗透深度和根管封闭剂百分比的影响。
J Endod. 2012 Jun;38(6):860-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
9
Influence of different irrigation regimens on the dentinal tubule penetration of a bioceramic-based root canal sealer: a confocal analysis study.不同冲洗方案对基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响:共聚焦分析研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1771-1777. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03356-4. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
10
Comparison of Easydo Activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro.比较 Easydo 激活器、超声和针头冲洗技术对体外封闭剂渗透和玷污层去除的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03833-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between the irrigation-agitation techniques and Periapical Healing of large periapical lesions: a Randomized Controlled Trial.冲洗-荡洗技术与根尖周大病变愈合的相关性:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 15;28(7):376. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05758-4.
2
Dual- or single rinse? The tubular sealer penetration of endodontic chelating agents.双冲洗还是单冲洗?根管螯合剂对根管封闭剂的渗透作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0303377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303377. eCollection 2024.
3
Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques.

本文引用的文献

1
Penetration depth of irrigants into root dentine after sonic, ultrasonic and photoacoustic activation.超声、超声和光声激活后冲洗液在根管牙本质中的渗透深度。
Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/iej.13108. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
2
Effect of chitosan nanoparticle, QMix, and EDTA on TotalFill BC sealers' dentinal tubule penetration: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.壳聚糖纳米粒子、QMix 和 EDTA 对 TotalFill BC 根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透性的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):64-71. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0359-0. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
Tubular dentin sealer penetration after different final irrigation protocols: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study.
弯曲根管内碎屑和玷污层的去除:超声和声波冲洗激活技术的比较研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/dj12030051.
4
Irrigants and irrigation activation systems in Endodontics.牙髓病学中的冲洗剂和冲洗激活系统。
Braz Dent J. 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):1-33. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305577.
5
Assessment of Dentinal Tubules Penetration by Hyben X Delivered into the Root Canal System as an Irrigant; An Study.作为冲洗剂注入根管系统的Hyben X对牙本质小管渗透的评估;一项研究。
Iran Endod J. 2023;18(1):53-58. doi: 10.22037/iej.v18i1.33114.
6
Smear Layer Removal from the Apical Third Using the Er,Cr:YSGG Photon-induced Photoacoustic Streaming.使用铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光光子诱导光声流去除根尖三分之一处的玷污层。
Iran Endod J. 2021 Fall;16(4):238-243. doi: 10.22037/iej.v16i4.34544.
7
Investigation of the effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic and new laser-assisted irrigation activation methods on smear removal and tubular penetration.研究声、超声和新型激光辅助冲洗激活方法对清除玷污层和根管穿透的效果。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Jan 3;38(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03697-8.
8
Comparison of sealer penetration of sonic activation versus conventional needle irrigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超声激活与传统针管冲洗对牙胶封闭剂渗透性的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 3;22(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02608-1.
不同最终冲洗方案后根管牙本质封闭剂的渗透情况:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究
Microsc Res Tech. 2018 Jun;81(6):649-654. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23019. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
4
Effect of Different Irrigation Systems on Sealer Penetration into Dentinal Tubules.不同冲洗系统对封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响。
J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):652-656. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.004.
5
Effect of Different Agitation Techniques on the Penetration of Irrigant and Sealer into Dentinal Tubules.不同搅拌技术对冲洗剂和封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Feb;35(2):71-77. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4125. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
6
Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation.使用EndoVac冲洗系统与传统根管针冲洗法时封闭剂渗透情况的比较。
J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):613-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.017. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
7
Comparison of Vibringe, EndoActivator, and needle irrigation on sealer penetration in extracted human teeth.比较 Vibringe、EndoActivator 和针管冲洗对人离体牙根管内封闭剂渗透的影响。
J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):708-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
The effect of the irrigant QMix on removal of canal wall smear layer: an ex vivo study.冲洗剂QMix对根管壁玷污层去除效果的体外研究。
Odontology. 2014 Jul;102(2):232-40. doi: 10.1007/s10266-012-0102-1. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
9
Depth of penetration of four resin sealers into radicular dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopic study.四种树脂密封剂在根管牙本质小管中的渗透深度:共聚焦显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2012 Oct;38(10):1412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
10
Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd:YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals.1320 纳米 Nd:YAG 激光激活冲洗对弯曲根管内封闭剂渗透的影响。
J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Jan 9.