Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy; European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Task Force for Emerging Infections. Basel, Switzerland.
Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.035. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
The purpose of this perspective is to review the options countries have to exit the draconian "lockdowns" in a carefully staged manner.
Experts from different countries experiencing Corona Virus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID-19) reviewed evidence and country-specific approaches and the results of their interventions.
Three factors are essential: 1. Reintroduction from countries with ongoing community transmission; 2. The need for extensive testing capacity and widespread community testing, and 3. An adequate supply of personal protective equipment, PPE, to protect health care workers. Discussed at length are lifting physical distancing, how to open manufacturing and construction, logistics, and the opening of higher educational institutions and schools. The use of electronic surveillance is considered.
Each country should decide on the best path forward. However, we can learn from each other, and the approaches are, in reality, very similar.
本观点旨在回顾各国以精心策划的方式逐步退出严厉的“封锁”措施的选择。
来自不同国家的专家对 2019 年冠状病毒病（COVID-19）的经验和具体国家的方法以及干预结果进行了审查。
有三个因素至关重要：1. 来自社区传播持续存在的国家的重新引入；2. 需要广泛的检测能力和广泛的社区检测；3. 充足的个人防护设备（PPE）供应，以保护医护人员。详细讨论了取消身体距离、如何开放制造业和建筑业、物流以及开放高等教育机构和学校。还考虑了电子监控的使用。
每个国家都应该决定前进的最佳道路。但是，我们可以互相学习，实际上，这些方法非常相似。
