Suppr超能文献

巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州一家大学医院中谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)和毒素 A/B 快速检测试验在艰难梭菌(前梭状芽孢杆菌属)诊断中的评价。

Evaluation of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid tests for Clostridioides (prev. Clostridium) difficile diagnosis in a university hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

机构信息

Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Antônio Carlos Avenue, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31.270-901, Brazil.

Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Prof. Alfredo Balena Avenue, 190, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Microbiol. 2020 Sep;51(3):1139-1143. doi: 10.1007/s42770-020-00288-z. Epub 2020 May 4.

Abstract

Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile is responsible for most cases of nosocomial diarrhea and, despite the high prevalence of the disease worldwide, the best laboratory diagnostic approach to diagnose C. difficile infection (CDI) is a subject of ongoing debate. Although the use of multiple tests is recommended, the cost of these algorithms commonly exceeds the affordability in some countries. Thus, to improve CDI diagnosis in a university hospital in Brazil, this study analyzed two immunochromatographic tests and one enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) to evaluate the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins of C. difficile. Stool samples of 89 adult patients presenting nosocomial diarrhea during hospitalization were included. The toxigenic culture was used as the reference method. GDH detection by both commercial tests showed high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92.1%). On the other hand, toxin-based methods showed a sensitivity between 19.2 and 57.7%. In conclusion, the results suggest that rapid tests for GDH detection are not only suitable for CDI diagnosis as screening tests but also as a single method.

摘要

艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌)是导致大多数医院获得性腹泻的原因,尽管该病在全球的患病率很高,但最佳的实验室诊断方法来诊断艰难梭菌感染(CDI)仍然存在争议。尽管建议使用多种检测方法,但这些算法的成本在某些国家通常超出了负担能力。因此,为了改善巴西一家大学医院的 CDI 诊断,本研究分析了两种免疫层析检测和一种酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),以评估谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)和艰难梭菌 A/B 毒素的检测。纳入了 89 名住院期间出现医院获得性腹泻的成年患者的粪便样本。毒力培养被用作参考方法。两种商业检测方法的 GDH 检测均显示出高灵敏度(100%)和特异性(92.1%)。另一方面,基于毒素的方法的灵敏度在 19.2%至 57.7%之间。总之,这些结果表明,用于检测 GDH 的快速检测不仅适合作为 CDI 诊断的筛选检测,也适合作为单一方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of .用于诊断……的实验室检测
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020 Mar;33(2):73-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400476. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
2
Clostridium difficile infection: review.艰难梭菌感染:综述。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;38(7):1211-1221. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03539-6. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
5
How to: Surveillance of Clostridium difficile infections.方法:艰难梭菌感染的监测。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验