Suppr超能文献

[采用两种试纸法评估新生儿低血糖症]

[Assessment of neonatal hypoglycemia with 2 test strip methods].

作者信息

Leibundgut K E, Bucher H U, Mieth D, Duc G

机构信息

Abteilung für Neonatologie der Universitäts-Frauenklinik Zürich.

出版信息

Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1988 Oct;136(10):694-7.

PMID:3237224
Abstract

We evaluated two glucose test strips for their accuracy in detecting hypoglycemia in newborn infants. Reflotest-Hypoglycemia and Haemo-Glucotest and the reflectance meter technique Reflomat I and Reflolux II respectively were used for screening blood sugar values, and compared with laboratory glucose determination using an automatic analyzer (glucose oxidase method). In 134 neonatal blood samples of 56 newborn infants glucose was quantified with the three methods. Hypoglycemia was defined as blood glucose of less than 2.2 mmol/l (less than 40 mg/dl). Test sensitivity was 71%, specificity 97% for Reflomat I, 88% and 82% for Reflolux II, respectively. Analysing the falsely normoglycemic values measured by Reflomat I, no true blood sugar value below 2 mmol/l (less than 36 mg/dl) was found, and no value below 1.2 mmol/l (less than 22 mg/dl) measured by Reflolux II. Defining hypoglycemia as a blood glucose value of less than 2 mmol/l (less than 36 mg/dl) the sensitivity for Reflomat I would be 100%; therefore, significant hyoglycemia should not be missed with this test. Both tests give some false-positives; 3 of 100 Reflomat I and 18 of 100 Reflolux II readings were falsely below 2.2 mmol/l (less than 40 mg/dl). From these data we conclude that Reflomat I is an accurate screening-test for hypoglycemia in neonates; while the use of Reflolux II would cause too much unnecessary treatment.

摘要

我们评估了两种血糖测试条在检测新生儿低血糖方面的准确性。分别使用了Reflotest - Hypoglycemia和Haemo - Glucotest以及反射光度计技术Reflomat I和Reflolux II来筛查血糖值,并与使用自动分析仪(葡萄糖氧化酶法)进行的实验室血糖测定进行比较。对56名新生儿的134份新生儿血样用这三种方法进行了血糖定量。低血糖定义为血糖低于2.2 mmol/l(低于40 mg/dl)。Reflomat I的检测灵敏度为71%,特异性为97%;Reflolux II的检测灵敏度和特异性分别为88%和82%。分析Reflomat I测得的假正常血糖值,未发现真正血糖值低于2 mmol/l(低于36 mg/dl)的情况;分析Reflolux II测得的结果,也未发现低于1.2 mmol/l(低于22 mg/dl)的值。将低血糖定义为血糖值低于2 mmol/l(低于36 mg/dl)时,Reflomat I的灵敏度将为100%;因此,该测试不会漏诊严重低血糖。两种测试都有一些假阳性结果;Reflomat I的100次读数中有3次、Reflolux II的100次读数中有18次被错误地判定为低于2.2 mmol/l(低于40 mg/dl)。根据这些数据我们得出结论,Reflomat I是一种准确的新生儿低血糖筛查测试;而使用Reflolux II会导致过多不必要的治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验