• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与医疗工作者实践:它是如何运作的?法国大学医院的一项混合方法研究。

Patient involvement in healthcare workers' practices: how does it operate? A mixed-methods study in a French university hospital.

机构信息

Department of Medical Evaluation and Epidemiology, Nantes University Hospital, Hôpital Saint-Jacques, 85 rue Saint-Jacques, 44093, Nantes cedex, France.

UMR INSERM 1246 SPHERE MethodS in Patient-centered outcomes and HEalth ResEarch, Universités de Nantes et Tours, Institut de recherche en Santé 2, Nantes, France.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 8;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05271-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05271-w
PMID:32384891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7206773/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present challenge for patient involvement is the improvement of healthcare efficiency through a deeper consideration of the patient experience. In hospitals, numerous interventions promoting patient involvement are informally implemented by healthcare workers (HCWs). The first aim of this study was to conduct an overview of hospital HCWs' experiences of the involvement of patients or their representatives. This overview included the involvement of patients in the domains of healthcare provision and support for other patients, healthcare quality and safety improvement, training and research. The second aim was to describe the challenges and conditions for the development of participative interventions by HCWs.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods sequential study at Nantes University Hospital from September 2017 to May 2018. To achieve the first aim, we performed a descriptive analysis of quantitative data collected via a questionnaire survey of 1290 HCWs. To achieve the second aim, we conducted a thematic analysis of qualitative data collected via eight semi-structured interviews with HCWs who reported involving patients or their representatives (family and patient association members) in healthcare.

RESULTS

Among the 213 survey participants (16.5%), 133 reported a total of 424 participative interventions, mostly in the domains of care quality and safety (37%) and care provision and support (29%). The analysis of the qualitative data evidenced three types of factors determining the implementation of such interventions: the profiles of patients and their representatives, the beliefs and attitudes of HCWs, and organisational factors. While leadership from patients and HCWs was a central element in the development of patient involvement interventions, organisations' capacities to foster a sustainable partnership culture appeared to be the next challenge to promote the patient-as-partner model in health systems. Our results also highlighted numerous benefits of patient and representative involvement for patients and HCWs.

CONCLUSIONS

The numerous initiatives reported show that patients and patient representatives participate alongside HCWs in hospitals. It is essential to take into account the facilitating and hindering factors of patient involvement in hospital HCWs' practices for the further development of current initiatives. Additional studies, especially from the point of view of patients, are needed to complement our findings.

摘要

背景

目前患者参与面临的挑战是通过更深入地考虑患者体验来提高医疗保健效率。在医院中,医疗保健工作者(HCWs)非正式地实施了许多促进患者参与的干预措施。本研究的首要目的是对医院 HCWs 参与患者或其代表的医疗保健提供和支持、医疗质量和安全改进、培训和研究等领域的经验进行概述。第二个目的是描述 HCWs 开展参与性干预措施的挑战和条件。

方法

我们于 2017 年 9 月至 2018 年 5 月在南特大学医院进行了一项混合方法顺序研究。为实现第一个目的,我们对通过对 1290 名 HCWs 进行问卷调查收集的定量数据进行了描述性分析。为实现第二个目的,我们对 8 名报告参与患者或其代表(家属和患者协会成员)的 HCWs 进行了半结构化访谈收集的定性数据进行了主题分析。

结果

在 213 名调查参与者(16.5%)中,有 133 人共报告了 424 项参与性干预措施,主要集中在医疗质量和安全(37%)和医疗保健提供和支持(29%)领域。对定性数据的分析表明,有三种类型的因素决定了这些干预措施的实施:患者及其代表的特征、HCWs 的信仰和态度以及组织因素。虽然患者和 HCWs 的领导力是发展患者参与式干预措施的核心要素,但组织促进可持续伙伴关系文化的能力似乎是在卫生系统中推广患者作为合作伙伴模式的下一个挑战。我们的研究结果还强调了患者和代表参与对患者和 HCWs 的诸多益处。

结论

报告的众多举措表明,患者及其代表与 HCWs 一起参与医院的工作。为了进一步发展当前的举措,必须考虑患者参与医院 HCWs 实践的促进和阻碍因素。需要进行更多研究,特别是从患者的角度出发,以补充我们的研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7dd/7206773/5961f18e4eff/12913_2020_5271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7dd/7206773/5961f18e4eff/12913_2020_5271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7dd/7206773/5961f18e4eff/12913_2020_5271_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient involvement in healthcare workers' practices: how does it operate? A mixed-methods study in a French university hospital.患者参与医疗工作者实践:它是如何运作的?法国大学医院的一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 8;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05271-w.
2
Healthcare workers knowledge of cholera multi-stranded interventions and its determining factors in North-East Nigeria: planning and policy implications.尼日利亚东北部医护人员对霍乱多方面干预措施的了解及其决定因素:规划和政策意义。
Hum Resour Health. 2023 Feb 1;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00796-7.
3
Healthcare Workers' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding the World Health Organization's "My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene": Evidence From a Vietnamese Central General Hospital.医护人员对世界卫生组织“我的五个手卫生时刻”的知识和态度:来自越南中央综合医院的证据。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2020 Jul;53(4):236-244. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.19.319. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Opportunities to strengthen resilience of health care workers regarding patient safety.加强医护人员在患者安全方面的韧性的机会。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10054-0.
5
Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence.医护人员的季节性流感疫苗接种:定性证据的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4.
6
Between empathy and anger: healthcare workers' perspectives on patient disengagement from antiretroviral treatment in Khayelitsha, South Africa - a qualitative study.在同情与愤怒之间:南非开普敦凯萨蒂沙地区医护人员对艾滋病病毒感染者中断抗逆转录病毒治疗的看法——一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 26;24(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01957-8.
7
Counseling and support services for healthcare workers in German university hospitals during the pandemic-descriptive results of a Germany-wide cross-sectional survey.德国大学医院医护人员在大流行期间的咨询和支持服务-一项全德横断面调查的描述性结果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 10;11:1186929. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186929. eCollection 2023.
8
Experiences and views of frontline healthcare workers' family members in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.英国一线医护工作者家属在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历和看法:一项定性研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Apr 11;13(1):2057166. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2057166. eCollection 2022.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Engaging physicians and nurses in balanced scorecard evaluation-An implication at Palestinian hospitals and recommendations for policy makers.将医生和护士纳入平衡计分卡评估:对巴勒斯坦医院的启示和对政策制定者的建议。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;11:1115403. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1115403. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Lived experiences of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) management: a qualitative phenomenological study in Southwest China.晚期胰腺癌患者对患者报告结局(PROs)管理的生活体验:中国西南地区的一项质性现象学研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e084259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084259.
2
An Evaluation of the Relationship between Training of Health Practitioners in a Person-Centred Care Model and their Person-Centred Attitudes.对医疗从业者以患者为中心的护理模式培训与其以患者为中心的态度之间关系的评估。
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Nov 24;23(4):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7564. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research.如何将患者和公众的观点纳入研究的设计与实施过程中。
F1000Res. 2018 Jun 18;7:752. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15162.1. eCollection 2018.
2
Patient engagement in hospital health service planning and improvement: a scoping review.患者参与医院健康服务规划与改进:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e018263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018263.
3
Patient Engagement: The Quebec Path.患者参与:魁北克之路。
Assessing patient partnership among emergency departments in France: a cross-sectional study.
评估法国急诊科的医患合作关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09905-7.
4
Patient Satisfaction With a Nurse-Led Pain Management Program: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Ethiopia.患者对护士主导的疼痛管理项目的满意度:埃塞俄比亚的一项准实验研究。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Nov 28;8:23779608221141237. doi: 10.1177/23779608221141237. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey.如何优化患者/家属参与医院规划和改进的共识:德尔菲调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e061271. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061271.
6
Organizational capacity for patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: interviews with patient/family advisors, managers and clinicians.医疗机构中患者和家属参与规划和改进的组织能力:患者/家属顾问、管理人员和临床医生的访谈。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 13;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab147.
7
Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews.优化患者和家属参与医院规划和改进的方法:定性访谈。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):967-977. doi: 10.1111/hex.13239. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Hospital capacity for patient engagement in planning and improving health services: a cross-sectional survey.医院让患者参与健康服务规划与改善的能力:一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06174-0.
Healthc Pap. 2016;16(2):78-83.
4
Expanding patient engagement in quality improvement and health system redesign: Three Canadian case studies.扩大患者在质量改进和卫生系统重新设计中的参与度:三个加拿大案例研究。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2016 Sep;29(5):176-82. doi: 10.1177/0840470416645601.
5
Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review.医院护理中的患者赋权、患者参与和以患者为中心:基于文献综述的概念分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
6
Promoting Patient and Family Partnerships in Ambulatory Care Improvement: A Narrative Review and Focus Group Findings.促进门诊护理改善中的患者及家庭伙伴关系:一项叙述性综述及焦点小组研究结果
Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1417-39. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0364-z. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how.患者参与临床研究:为何、何时以及如何参与。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 27;10:631-40. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S104259. eCollection 2016.
8
Patients' involvement in improvement initiatives: a qualitative systematic review.患者参与改进举措:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):232-90. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1452.
9
[The Montreal model: the challenges of a partnership relationship between patients and healthcare professionals].[蒙特利尔模式:患者与医疗保健专业人员之间伙伴关系的挑战]
Sante Publique. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1 Suppl):S41-50.
10
Patient and family engagement: a survey of US hospital practices.患者和家属参与:美国医院实践调查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):182-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004006. Epub 2015 Jun 16.