Suppr超能文献

优化患者和家属参与医院规划和改进的方法:定性访谈。

Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews.

机构信息

Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):967-977. doi: 10.1111/hex.13239. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient engagement (PE) in health-care planning and improvement is a growing practice. We lack evidence-based guidance for PE, particularly in hospital settings. This study explored how to optimize PE in hospitals.

METHODS

This study was based on qualitative interviews with individuals in various roles at hospitals with high PE capacity. We asked how patients were engaged, rationale for approaches chosen and solutions for key challenges. We identified themes using content analysis.

RESULTS

Participants included 40 patient/family advisors, PE managers, clinicians and executives from 9 hospitals (2 < 100 beds, 4 100 + beds, 3 teaching). Hospitals most frequently employed collaboration (standing committees, project teams), followed by blended approaches (collaboration + consultation), and then consultation (surveys, interviews). Those using collaboration emphasized integrating perspectives into decisions; those using consultation emphasized capturing diverse perspectives. Strategies to support engagement included engaging diverse patients, prioritizing what benefits many, matching patients to projects, training patients and health-care workers, involving a critical volume of patients, requiring at least one patient for quorum, asking involved patients to review outputs, linking PE with the Board of Directors and championing PE by managers, staff and committee/team chairs.

CONCLUSION

This research generated insight on concrete approaches and strategies that hospitals can use to optimize PE for planning and improvement. On-going research is needed to understand how to recruit diverse patients and best balance blended consultation/collaboration approaches.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Three patient research partners with hospital PE experience informed study objectives and interview questions.

摘要

背景

患者参与医疗保健规划和改进是一种日益增长的实践。我们缺乏针对患者参与的循证指导,尤其是在医院环境中。本研究探讨了如何在医院优化患者参与。

方法

本研究基于对具有高患者参与能力的医院各角色个体的定性访谈。我们询问了如何让患者参与进来,选择方法的理由以及解决关键挑战的方法。我们使用内容分析确定了主题。

结果

参与者包括来自 9 家医院的 40 名患者/家庭顾问、患者参与管理人员、临床医生和管理人员(2 家<100 张床位,4 家 100 张+床位,3 家教学医院)。医院最常采用合作(常设委员会、项目团队),其次是混合方法(合作+咨询),然后是咨询(调查、访谈)。那些采用合作的人强调将观点融入决策中;那些采用咨询的人强调捕捉不同的观点。支持参与的策略包括让不同的患者参与进来,优先考虑对许多人有益的事情,将患者与项目匹配,培训患者和医疗保健工作者,让足够数量的患者参与进来,要求至少有一位患者参加法定人数,让参与的患者审查产出,将患者参与与董事会联系起来,并由管理人员、员工和委员会/团队主席倡导患者参与。

结论

这项研究为医院优化规划和改进方面的患者参与提供了具体方法和策略的见解。需要进行进一步的研究,以了解如何招募不同的患者,并更好地平衡混合咨询/合作方法。

患者或公众贡献

三位具有医院患者参与经验的患者研究伙伴为研究目标和访谈问题提供了信息。

相似文献

9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

8
Patient and family perceptions of a discharge bedside board.患者及家属对出院床边展板的看法。
PEC Innov. 2023 Sep 11;3:100214. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100214. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验