Sports Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic, USA.
Department of Psychology, Yale University, USA.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 May 1;19(2):408-419. eCollection 2020 Jun.
The use of self-report psychological assessment tools in outcomes research has become increasingly frequent, though many sports medicine providers and researchers are unfamiliar with these instruments. We conducted a systematic search of the sports medicine literature in PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar of studies published on or before November 1, 2019. Included psychological self-assessment tools were limited to those in a written self-assessment format and were used in musculoskeletal sports injury or concussion treatment outcome studies. Both pre- or post-treatment psychological assessments were included. Thirty-four assessment scales of psychological factors were utilized across 152 sports injury treatment outcomes studies. Six assessment tools were utilized in 5 or more studies and the remaining 28 were utilized in 4 or fewer studies. Many of the utilized scales have adequate assessment and reporting of internal consistency reliability, supporting further reliability and validation studies for use in sports injury treatment outcomes research.
在成果研究中,自我报告式心理评估工具的使用越来越频繁,尽管许多运动医学提供者和研究人员并不熟悉这些工具。我们在 PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus 和 Google Scholar 上进行了系统的文献检索,检索范围为 2019 年 11 月 1 日或之前发表的研究。纳入的心理自我评估工具仅限于书面自我评估格式,并用于肌肉骨骼运动损伤或脑震荡治疗结果研究。包括治疗前后的心理评估。在 152 项运动损伤治疗结果研究中使用了 34 种评估心理因素的量表。有 6 种评估工具在 5 项或更多研究中使用,其余 28 种在 4 项或更少研究中使用。许多使用的量表具有足够的评估和内部一致性信度报告,支持进一步的可靠性和验证研究,以用于运动损伤治疗结果研究。