• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康年轻人冒险觅食行为的预测因素。

Predictors of risky foraging behaviour in healthy young people.

机构信息

Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK.

Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;4(8):832-843. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0867-0. Epub 2020 May 11.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-020-0867-0
PMID:32393840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7115941/
Abstract

During adolescence and early adulthood, learning when to avoid threats and when to pursue rewards becomes crucial. Using a risky foraging task, we investigated individual differences in this dynamic across 781 individuals aged 14-24 years who were split into a hypothesis-generating discovery sample and a hold-out confirmation sample. Sex was the most important predictor of cautious behaviour and performance. Males earned one standard deviation (or 20%) more reward than females, collected more reward when there was little to lose and reduced foraging to the same level as females when potential losses became high. Other independent predictors of cautiousness and performance were self-reported daringness, IQ and self-reported cognitive complexity. We found no evidence for an impact of age or maturation. Thus, maleness, a high IQ or self-reported cognitive complexity, and self-reported daringness predicted greater success in risky foraging, possibly due to better exploitation of low-risk opportunities in high-risk environments.

摘要

在青少年和成年早期,学会何时避免威胁,何时追求奖励变得至关重要。我们使用一项风险觅食任务,在年龄在 14 到 24 岁之间的 781 个人中,对这种动态的个体差异进行了研究,这些人被分为假设生成的发现样本和保留确认的样本。性是谨慎行为和表现的最重要预测因素。男性比女性多获得一个标准差(或 20%)的奖励,在损失很少时获得更多的奖励,并且当潜在损失增加时,他们的觅食行为会降低到与女性相同的水平。谨慎性和表现的其他独立预测因素包括自我报告的胆量、智商和自我报告的认知复杂性。我们没有发现年龄或成熟度有影响的证据。因此,男性、高智商或自我报告的认知复杂性以及自我报告的胆量预测了在风险觅食中更大的成功,这可能是由于在高风险环境中更好地利用了低风险机会。

相似文献

1
Predictors of risky foraging behaviour in healthy young people.健康年轻人冒险觅食行为的预测因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;4(8):832-843. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0867-0. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Adolescent neural response to reward is related to participant sex and task motivation.青少年对奖励的神经反应与参与者的性别和任务动机有关。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Feb;111:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
3
A multilevel mixed effect analysis of neighbourhood and individual level determinants of risky sexual behaviour among young people in South Africa.南非年轻人性行为风险的多水平混合效应分析:社区和个体层面决定因素。
Reprod Health. 2022 May 12;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01407-9.
4
Individual differences in impulsive and risky choice: effects of environmental rearing conditions.冲动和风险选择中的个体差异:环境饲养条件的影响
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Aug 1;269:115-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
5
Brain activation covaries with reported criminal behaviors when making risky choices: A fuzzy-trace theory approach.当做出风险选择时,大脑激活与报告的犯罪行为相关:模糊痕迹理论方法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jul;147(7):1094-1109. doi: 10.1037/xge0000434.
6
Risky decision-taking task: A novel paradigm to assess the risk-taking behaviour in rats predisposed to early-life stress.风险决策任务:一种评估易受早期生活应激影响的大鼠风险行为的新范式。
J Neurosci Methods. 2023 May 15;392:109864. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109864. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
7
Adolescents' Neural Processing of Risky Decisions: Effects of Sex and Behavioral Disinhibition.青少年对风险决策的神经处理:性别和行为抑制的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0132322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132322. eCollection 2015.
8
Does cognitive control ability mediate the relationship between reward-related mechanisms, impulsivity, and maladaptive outcomes in adolescence and young adulthood?认知控制能力是否在青少年和青年期的奖励相关机制、冲动性和适应不良结果之间起中介作用?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):653-676. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00722-2.
9
Suboptimal foraging behavior: a new perspective on gambling.次优觅食行为:赌博的新视角。
Behav Neurosci. 2015 Oct;129(5):656-665. doi: 10.1037/bne0000082. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Relationship between adolescent risk preferences on a laboratory task and behavioral measures of risk-taking.青少年在实验室任务中风险偏好与冒险行为的行为测量之间的关系。
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Feb;48(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.008. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotions and individual differences shape human foraging under threat.情绪和个体差异塑造了人类在威胁下的觅食行为。
Nat Ment Health. 2025;3(4):444-465. doi: 10.1038/s44220-025-00393-8. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
Stochastic decisions support optimal foraging of volatile environments, and are disrupted by anxiety.随机决策有助于在多变环境中实现最优觅食,且会因焦虑而受到干扰。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jan 9. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01256-y.
3
Mating proximity blinds threat perception.交配临近会蒙蔽威胁感知。

本文引用的文献

1
Risk-taking to obtain reward: sex differences and associations with emotional and depressive symptoms in a nationally representative cohort of UK adolescents.冒险以获取奖励:英国青少年全国代表性队列中的性别差异与情绪和抑郁症状的关联。
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(13):2805-2813. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005000. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
Disentangling Hippocampal and Amygdala Contribution to Human Anxiety-Like Behavior.解析海马体和杏仁核对人类焦虑样行为的贡献。
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 23;39(43):8517-8526. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0412-19.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
3
Minimizing threat via heuristic and optimal policies recruits hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex.
Nature. 2024 Oct;634(8034):635-643. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07890-3. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
Reviewing explore/exploit decision-making as a transdiagnostic target for psychosis, depression, and anxiety.审查探索/开发决策作为精神病、抑郁和焦虑的跨诊断靶点。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Oct;24(5):793-815. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01186-9. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
5
Functional sophistication in human escape.人类逃避行为中的功能复杂性。
iScience. 2023 Oct 18;26(11):108240. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108240. eCollection 2023 Nov 17.
6
Self-reported childhood family adversity is linked to an attenuated gain of trust during adolescence.自我报告的儿童期家庭逆境与青少年时期信任增益减弱有关。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 30;14(1):6920. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41531-z.
7
Acetylcholine and noradrenaline enhance foraging optimality in humans.乙酰胆碱和去甲肾上腺素增强人类觅食的最优性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 5;120(36):e2305596120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305596120. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
8
The effects of hydrocortisone and yohimbine on human behavior in approach-avoidance conflicts.氢化可的松和育亨宾对人类在趋近-回避冲突中的行为的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Aug;240(8):1705-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06396-6. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
9
Multi-Round Trust Game Quantifies Inter-Individual Differences in Social Exchange from Adolescence to Adulthood.多轮信任博弈量化了从青春期到成年期社会交往中的个体间差异。
Comput Psychiatr. 2021 Oct 14;5(1):102-118. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.65.
10
The effect of apathy and compulsivity on planning and stopping in sequential decision-making.冷漠和强迫对序列决策中计划和停止的影响。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 31;20(3):e3001566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001566. eCollection 2022 Mar.
通过启发式和最优策略最小化威胁会招募海马体和内侧前额叶皮质。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jul;3(7):733-745. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0603-9. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Change, stability, and instability in the Pavlovian guidance of behaviour from adolescence to young adulthood.从青春期到成年早期,巴甫洛夫行为指导中的变化、稳定性和不稳定性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Dec 31;14(12):e1006679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006679. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Effect of valproate and pregabalin on human anxiety-like behaviour in a randomised controlled trial.丙戊酸盐和普瑞巴林对随机对照试验中人类焦虑样行为的影响。
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 16;8(1):157. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0206-7.
6
Neuroethological studies of fear, anxiety, and risky decision-making in rodents and humans.啮齿动物和人类恐惧、焦虑及风险决策的神经行为学研究。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Oct;5:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Modeling Trajectories of Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity Dimensions from Early to Late Adolescence: Universal Trends or Distinct Sub-groups?从青少年早期到晚期,感觉寻求和冲动维度轨迹的建模:普遍趋势还是不同的亚组?
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1992-2005. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0891-9. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
8
Psychiatric Symptom Dimensions Are Associated With Dissociable Shifts in Metacognition but Not Task Performance.精神症状维度与元认知的可分离转变有关,但与任务表现无关。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 15;84(6):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
Heuristic and optimal policy computations in the human brain during sequential decision-making.序列决策过程中人类大脑的启发式和最优策略计算
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 23;9(1):325. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02750-3.
10
An elevated plus-maze in mixed reality for studying human anxiety-related behavior.混合现实中的高架十字迷宫,用于研究人类焦虑相关行为。
BMC Biol. 2017 Dec 21;15(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0463-6.