• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用早期数据估算法国新冠病毒的实际感染致死率

Using Early Data to Estimate the Actual Infection Fatality Ratio from COVID-19 in France.

作者信息

Roques Lionel, Klein Etienne K, Papaïx Julien, Sar Antoine, Soubeyrand Samuel

机构信息

INRAE, BioSP, 84914 Avignon, France.

Medicentre Moutier, 2740 Moutier, Switzerland.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2020 May 8;9(5):97. doi: 10.3390/biology9050097.

DOI:10.3390/biology9050097
PMID:32397286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7284549/
Abstract

The number of screening tests carried out in France and the methodology used to target the patients tested do not allow for a direct computation of the actual number of cases and the infection fatality ratio (IFR). The main objective of this work is to estimate the actual number of people infected with COVID-19 and to deduce the IFR during the observation window in France. We develop a `mechanistic-statistical' approach coupling a SIR epidemiological model describing the unobserved epidemiological dynamics, a probabilistic model describing the data acquisition process and a statistical inference method. The actual number of infected cases in France is probably higher than the observations: we find here a factor ×8 (95%-CI: 5-12) which leads to an IFR in France of 0.5% (95%-CI: 0.3-0.8) based on hospital death counting data. Adjusting for the number of deaths in nursing homes, we obtain an IFR of 0.8% (95%-CI: 0.45-1.25). This IFR is consistent with previous findings in China (0.66%) and in the UK (0.9%) and lower than the value previously computed on the Diamond Princess cruse ship data (1.3%).

摘要

在法国进行的筛查测试数量以及用于确定受测患者的方法,无法直接计算实际病例数和感染致死率(IFR)。这项工作的主要目标是估计法国在观察期内感染新冠病毒的实际人数,并推算出感染致死率。我们开发了一种“机械 - 统计”方法,该方法结合了一个描述未观察到的流行病学动态的SIR流行病学模型、一个描述数据采集过程的概率模型以及一种统计推断方法。法国的实际感染病例数可能高于观察到的数量:我们在此发现一个8倍的系数(95%置信区间:5 - 12),基于医院死亡计数数据,这导致法国的感染致死率为0.5%(95%置信区间:0.3 - 0.8)。对养老院死亡人数进行调整后,我们得出的感染致死率为0.8%(95%置信区间:0.45 - 1.25)。这个感染致死率与中国先前的研究结果(0.66%)和英国的研究结果(0.9%)一致,且低于之前根据钻石公主号邮轮数据计算出的值(1.3%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/57f6bdb65af4/biology-09-00097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/740db3620784/biology-09-00097-g0A1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/41074782a0a8/biology-09-00097-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/23bf2a72e35e/biology-09-00097-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/240c414a97e2/biology-09-00097-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/ff6ffa5c4de5/biology-09-00097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/57f6bdb65af4/biology-09-00097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/740db3620784/biology-09-00097-g0A1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/41074782a0a8/biology-09-00097-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/23bf2a72e35e/biology-09-00097-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/240c414a97e2/biology-09-00097-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/ff6ffa5c4de5/biology-09-00097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb25/7284549/57f6bdb65af4/biology-09-00097-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Early Data to Estimate the Actual Infection Fatality Ratio from COVID-19 in France.利用早期数据估算法国新冠病毒的实际感染致死率
Biology (Basel). 2020 May 8;9(5):97. doi: 10.3390/biology9050097.
2
Variation in the COVID-19 infection-fatality ratio by age, time, and geography during the pre-vaccine era: a systematic analysis.在疫苗接种前时代,按年龄、时间和地理位置划分的 COVID-19 感染病死率变化:系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1469-1488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02867-1. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
3
[Infection fatality rate (IFR) during the course of COVID-19 pandemic in Upper Silesia Metropolitan Area (Poland) in 2020].[2020年波兰上西里西亚都会区新冠疫情期间的感染死亡率(IFR)]
Med Pr. 2021 Dec 22;72(6):671-676. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.01179. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
The COVID-19 Infection in Italy: A Statistical Study of an Abnormally Severe Disease.意大利的新冠病毒感染:一种异常严重疾病的统计研究
J Clin Med. 2020 May 21;9(5):1564. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051564.
5
Estimation of COVID-19 risk-stratified epidemiological parameters and policy implications for Los Angeles County through an integrated risk and stochastic epidemiological model.通过综合风险与随机流行病学模型对洛杉矶县新冠病毒病风险分层的流行病学参数进行估计及政策影响分析
medRxiv. 2020 Dec 14:2020.12.11.20209627. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.11.20209627.
6
Estimating Unreported COVID-19 Cases with a Time-Varying SIR Regression Model.利用时变 SIR 回归模型估计未报告的 COVID-19 病例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;18(3):1090. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031090.
7
Factors associated with the spatial heterogeneity of the first wave of COVID-19 in France: a nationwide geo-epidemiological study.与法国 COVID-19 第一波空间异质性相关的因素:一项全国范围的地理流行病学研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e222-e231. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00006-2. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
8
Infection fatality ratio and case fatality ratio of COVID-19.新冠病毒感染病死率和病例病死率。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
9
Bayesian inference across multiple models suggests a strong increase in lethality of COVID-19 in late 2020 in the UK.贝叶斯推断多个模型表明,2020 年末英国 COVID-19 的致命性显著增加。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 24;16(11):e0258968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258968. eCollection 2021.
10
SARS-CoV-2 Infections and COVID-19 Fatality: Estimation of Infection Fatality Ratio and Current Prevalence.SARS-CoV-2 感染和 COVID-19 死亡率:感染死亡率和当前流行率的估计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;17(24):9290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249290.

引用本文的文献

1
Early COVID-19 Pandemic Preparedness: Informing Public Health Interventions and Hospital Capacity Planning Through Participatory Hybrid Simulation Modeling.早期新冠疫情防范:通过参与式混合模拟建模为公共卫生干预措施和医院容量规划提供信息
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 30;22(1):39. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010039.
2
COVID-19 second wave: District level study of concentration of confirmed cases and fatality in India.新冠疫情第二波:印度各地区确诊病例和死亡人数集中度研究
Environ Chall (Amst). 2021 Dec;5:100221. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100221. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
3
Genomic surveillance reveals dynamic shifts in the connectivity of COVID-19 epidemics.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting the cumulative number of cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in China from early data.从早期数据预测中国 COVID-19 疫情的累计病例数。
Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Apr 8;17(4):3040-3051. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020172.
2
Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France.估算法国 SARS-CoV-2 的负担。
Science. 2020 Jul 10;369(6500):208-211. doi: 10.1126/science.abc3517. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19.新冠病毒脱落和传播的时间动态。
基因组监测揭示了新冠疫情传播链的动态变化。
Cell. 2023 Dec 21;186(26):5690-5704.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Effect of sojourn time distributions on the early dynamics of COVID-19 outbreak.潜伏期分布对新冠疫情早期动态的影响。
Nonlinear Dyn. 2023;111(12):11685-11702. doi: 10.1007/s11071-023-08400-2. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
5
Using a latent Hawkes process for epidemiological modelling.利用潜在的 Hawkes 过程进行流行病学建模。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):e0281370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281370. eCollection 2023.
6
Data-driven multiscale dynamical framework to control a pandemic evolution with non-pharmaceutical interventions.数据驱动的多尺度动力学框架,用于通过非药物干预控制大流行病的演变。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 17;18(1):e0278882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278882. eCollection 2023.
7
Coronavirus covid-19 detection by means of explainable deep learning.利用可解释深度学习进行冠状病毒 covid-19 检测。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 10;13(1):462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27697-y.
8
Mathematical modeling to study the impact of immigration on the dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study for Venezuela.运用数学模型研究移民对 COVID-19 大流行动态的影响:以委内瑞拉为例。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;43:100532. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2022.100532. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
9
Exploring COVID-19 transmission patterns and key factors during epidemics caused by three major strains in Asia.探索亚洲三大主要毒株引发的疫情期间 COVID-19 的传播模式和关键因素。
J Theor Biol. 2023 Jan 21;557:111336. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111336. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
10
From individual-based epidemic models to McKendrick-von Foerster PDEs: a guide to modeling and inferring COVID-19 dynamics.从基于个体的传染病模型到 McKendrick-von Foerster PDE 方程:建模和推断 COVID-19 动力学的指南。
J Math Biol. 2022 Sep 28;85(4):43. doi: 10.1007/s00285-022-01794-4.
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis.新型冠状病毒疾病 2019 严重程度的估计:基于模型的分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):669-677. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
5
Estimating the infection and case fatality ratio for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) using age-adjusted data from the outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, February 2020.利用 2020 年 2 月钻石公主号游轮上疫情的年龄调整后数据估计冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的感染和病死率。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Mar;25(12). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.2000256.
6
Understanding Unreported Cases in the COVID-19 Epidemic Outbreak in Wuhan, China, and the Importance of Major Public Health Interventions.了解中国武汉新冠疫情爆发中的未报告病例以及重大公共卫生干预措施的重要性。
Biology (Basel). 2020 Mar 8;9(3):50. doi: 10.3390/biology9030050.
7
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国武汉成人 COVID-19 住院患者的临床病程和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.SARS-CoV-2 在不同类型临床标本中的检测。
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.
9
An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.一个基于网络的交互式仪表盘,用于实时追踪新冠病毒。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus.与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒相比,新型冠状病毒肺炎的繁殖数更高。
J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13;27(2). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa021.