Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan.
Acc Chem Res. 2020 Jun 16;53(6):1187-1195. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00106. Epub 2020 May 13.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of crystalline porous materials characterized by inorganic nodes and multitopic organic linkers. Because of their molecular-scale porosity and periodic intraframework chemical functionality, MOFs are attractive scaffolds for supporting and/or organizing catalysts, photocatalysts, chemical-sensing elements, small enzymes, and numerous other functional-property-imparting, nanometer-scale objects. Notably, these objects can be installed after the synthesis of the MOF, eliminating the need for chemical and thermal compatibility of the objects with the synthesis milieu. Thus, postsynthetically functionalized MOFs can present three-dimensional arrays of high-density, yet well-separated, active sites. Depending on the application and corresponding morphological requirements, MOF materials can be prepared in thin-film form, pelletized form, isolated single-crystal form, polycrystalline powder form, mixed-matrix membrane form, or other forms. For certain applications, most obviously catalytic hydrolysis and electro- or photocatalytic water splitting, but also many others, an additional requirement is water stability. MOFs featuring hexa-zirconium(IV)-oxy nodes satisfy this requirement. For applications involving electrocatalysis, charge storage, photoelectrochemical energy conversion, and chemiresistive sensing, a further requirement is electrical conductivity, as embodied in electron or hole transport. As most MOFs, under most conditions, are electrically insulating, imparting controllable charge-transport behavior is both a chemically intriguing and chemically compelling challenge.Herein, we describe three strategies to render zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) tunably electrically conductive and, therefore, capable of transporting charge on the few nanometers (i.e., several molecular units) to few micrometers (i.e., typical dimensions for MOF microcrystallites) scale. The first strategy centers on redox-hopping between periodically arranged, chemically equivalent sites, essentially repetitive electron (or hole) self-exchange. Zirconium nodes are electrically insulating, but they can function as grafting sites for (a) redox-active inorganic clusters or (b) molecular redox couples. Alternatively, charge hopping based on linker redox properties can be exploited. Marcus's theory of electron transfer has proven useful for understanding/predicting trends in redox-hopping based conductivity, most notably, in accounting for variations as great as 3000-fold depending on the direction of charge propagation through structurally anisotropic MOFs. In MOF environments, propagation of electronic charge via redox hopping is necessarily accompanied by movement of charge-compensating ions. Consequently, rates of redox hopping can depend on both the identity and concentration of ions permeating the MOF. In the context of electrocatalysis, an important goal is to transport electronic charge fast enough to match or exceed the inherent activity of MOF-based or MOF-immobilized catalysts.Bandlike electronic conductivity is the focus of an alternative strategy: one based on the introduction of molecular guests capable of forming donor-acceptor charge transfer complexes with the host framework. Theory again can be applied predictively to alter conductivity. A third strategy similarly emphasizes electronic conductivity, but it makes use of added bridges in the form of molecular oligomers or inorganic clusters that can then be linked to span the length of a MOF crystallite. For all strategies, retention of molecular-scale porosity is emphasized, as this property is key to many applications. Finally, while our focus is on Zr-MOFs, the described approaches clearly are extendable to other MOF compositions, as has already been demonstrated, in part, in studies by others.
金属有机骨架(MOFs)是一类具有无机节点和多齿有机连接体的晶体多孔材料。由于其分子级孔隙率和周期性的骨架内化学功能,MOFs 是支持和/或组织催化剂、光催化剂、化学感应元件、小酶和许多其他赋予功能、纳米级物体的理想支架。值得注意的是,这些物体可以在 MOF 的合成后安装,从而消除了物体与合成环境的化学和热兼容性的需要。因此,后合成功能化的 MOF 可以呈现出高密度但分离良好的活性位点的三维阵列。根据应用和相应的形态要求,MOF 材料可以制备成薄膜形式、颗粒形式、孤立单晶形式、多晶粉末形式、混合基质膜形式或其他形式。对于某些应用,尤其是催化水解和电或光催化水分解,但也有许多其他应用,还需要额外的水稳定性。具有六锆(IV)氧节点的 MOF 满足这一要求。对于涉及电催化、电荷存储、光电化学能量转换和化学电阻传感的应用,进一步的要求是导电性,体现在电子或空穴传输中。由于大多数 MOF 在大多数条件下都是电绝缘的,因此赋予可控的电荷输运行为既是一个具有化学吸引力的挑战,也是一个具有化学吸引力的挑战。在这里,我们描述了三种策略来调整锆基金属有机骨架(MOF)的电导率,从而使它们能够在几纳米(即几个分子单元)到几微米(即 MOF 微晶的典型尺寸)的范围内传输电荷。第一种策略集中在周期性排列的、化学等效的位点之间的氧化还原跳跃上,本质上是重复的电子(或空穴)自交换。锆节点是电绝缘的,但它们可以作为(a)氧化还原活性无机簇或(b)分子氧化还原偶的嫁接位点。或者,可以利用基于配体氧化还原性质的电荷跳跃来利用。马库斯(Marcus)的电子转移理论已被证明有助于理解/预测基于氧化还原跳跃的电导率趋势,尤其是在解释结构各向异性 MOF 中高达 3000 倍的变化方面。在 MOF 环境中,通过氧化还原跳跃进行的电子电荷的传播必然伴随着电荷补偿离子的移动。因此,氧化还原跳跃的速率既取决于穿过 MOF 的电荷传播的方向,也取决于离子的身份和浓度。在电催化的背景下,一个重要的目标是传输电子电荷的速度足够快,以匹配或超过基于 MOF 或固定在 MOF 上的催化剂的固有活性。带型电子导电性是另一种策略的焦点:基于引入能够与主体骨架形成供体-受体电荷转移配合物的分子客体。理论同样可以被应用于预测性地改变电导率。第三种策略同样强调电子导电性,但它利用了分子寡聚物或无机簇的附加桥,然后可以将其连接起来以跨越 MOF 微晶的长度。对于所有的策略,都强调保持分子级孔隙率,因为这一特性是许多应用的关键。最后,虽然我们的重点是 Zr-MOF,但所描述的方法显然可以扩展到其他 MOF 成分,正如其他人已经部分证明的那样。