Suppr超能文献

评估牙本质敏感量表的敏感性和特异性——一项准确性研究。

Sensitivity and specificity of assessment scales of dentin hypersensitivity - an accuracy study.

机构信息

Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri - UFVJM, Department of Dentistry , Diamantina , MG , Brazil .

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2020 May 8;34:e043. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0043.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of pain scales used to assess dentin hypersensitivity (DH). The preferred scale, and toothbrushing habits of participants were also investigated. This cross-sectional study was conducted with students and employees of a Brazilian Federal University who presented DH. The participants answered a questionnaire about their toothbrushing and drinking habits. Hypersensitive and non-sensitive teeth were submitted to tactile and ice stick stimuli. Then, the subjects marked their pain level in the visual analogue (VAS), numeric scale (NS), faces pain scale (FPS) and verbal evaluation scale (VES). DH was also assessed by Schiff scale (SS). The data were analyzed by Wilcoxon and Chi-Square tests, as well as by ROC curve. The mean age of the sample (56 women, 16 men) was 27.8 years. The most prevalent acidic beverage was coffee (36.0%) and the most preferred scale was the NS (47.2%). The pain level was statistically higher in teeth with DH compared to teeth without DH (p < 0.05). The accuracy ranged from 0.729 (SS) to 0.750 (NS). The highest sensitivity value was 81.9% for NS. The SS presented the highest specificity (91%). The visual analog, numerical, verbal evaluation, faces pain, and Schiff scales were accurate for DH diagnosis. The Schiff scale was the preferred scale for DH assessment.

摘要

本研究旨在比较评估牙本质敏感(DH)的疼痛量表的敏感性和特异性。还研究了首选量表和参与者的刷牙习惯。这是一项横断面研究,在巴西联邦大学的学生和员工中进行,他们表现出 DH。参与者回答了一份关于他们刷牙和饮酒习惯的问卷。敏感和非敏感牙齿接受触觉和冰棒刺激。然后,受试者在视觉模拟量表(VAS)、数字量表(NS)、面部疼痛量表(FPS)和口头评估量表(VES)上标记他们的疼痛程度。DH 还通过 Schiff 量表(SS)进行评估。使用 Wilcoxon 和 Chi-Square 检验以及 ROC 曲线对数据进行分析。样本的平均年龄(56 名女性,16 名男性)为 27.8 岁。最常见的酸性饮料是咖啡(36.0%),最受欢迎的量表是 NS(47.2%)。与无 DH 的牙齿相比,DH 牙齿的疼痛程度统计学上更高(p < 0.05)。准确度范围为 0.729(SS)至 0.750(NS)。NS 的敏感性最高值为 81.9%。SS 的特异性最高(91%)。视觉模拟、数字、口头评估、面部疼痛和 Schiff 量表对 DH 诊断均准确。Schiff 量表是 DH 评估的首选量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验