• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估牙本质敏感量表的敏感性和特异性——一项准确性研究。

Sensitivity and specificity of assessment scales of dentin hypersensitivity - an accuracy study.

机构信息

Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri - UFVJM, Department of Dentistry , Diamantina , MG , Brazil .

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2020 May 8;34:e043. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0043.

DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0043
PMID:32401933
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of pain scales used to assess dentin hypersensitivity (DH). The preferred scale, and toothbrushing habits of participants were also investigated. This cross-sectional study was conducted with students and employees of a Brazilian Federal University who presented DH. The participants answered a questionnaire about their toothbrushing and drinking habits. Hypersensitive and non-sensitive teeth were submitted to tactile and ice stick stimuli. Then, the subjects marked their pain level in the visual analogue (VAS), numeric scale (NS), faces pain scale (FPS) and verbal evaluation scale (VES). DH was also assessed by Schiff scale (SS). The data were analyzed by Wilcoxon and Chi-Square tests, as well as by ROC curve. The mean age of the sample (56 women, 16 men) was 27.8 years. The most prevalent acidic beverage was coffee (36.0%) and the most preferred scale was the NS (47.2%). The pain level was statistically higher in teeth with DH compared to teeth without DH (p < 0.05). The accuracy ranged from 0.729 (SS) to 0.750 (NS). The highest sensitivity value was 81.9% for NS. The SS presented the highest specificity (91%). The visual analog, numerical, verbal evaluation, faces pain, and Schiff scales were accurate for DH diagnosis. The Schiff scale was the preferred scale for DH assessment.

摘要

本研究旨在比较评估牙本质敏感(DH)的疼痛量表的敏感性和特异性。还研究了首选量表和参与者的刷牙习惯。这是一项横断面研究,在巴西联邦大学的学生和员工中进行,他们表现出 DH。参与者回答了一份关于他们刷牙和饮酒习惯的问卷。敏感和非敏感牙齿接受触觉和冰棒刺激。然后,受试者在视觉模拟量表(VAS)、数字量表(NS)、面部疼痛量表(FPS)和口头评估量表(VES)上标记他们的疼痛程度。DH 还通过 Schiff 量表(SS)进行评估。使用 Wilcoxon 和 Chi-Square 检验以及 ROC 曲线对数据进行分析。样本的平均年龄(56 名女性,16 名男性)为 27.8 岁。最常见的酸性饮料是咖啡(36.0%),最受欢迎的量表是 NS(47.2%)。与无 DH 的牙齿相比,DH 牙齿的疼痛程度统计学上更高(p < 0.05)。准确度范围为 0.729(SS)至 0.750(NS)。NS 的敏感性最高值为 81.9%。SS 的特异性最高(91%)。视觉模拟、数字、口头评估、面部疼痛和 Schiff 量表对 DH 诊断均准确。Schiff 量表是 DH 评估的首选量表。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity and specificity of assessment scales of dentin hypersensitivity - an accuracy study.评估牙本质敏感量表的敏感性和特异性——一项准确性研究。
Braz Oral Res. 2020 May 8;34:e043. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0043.
2
A pilot assessment of alternative methods of quantifying dental pain with particular reference to dentine hypersensitivity.一项关于量化牙齿疼痛的替代方法的初步评估,特别提及牙本质过敏。
Community Dent Health. 1997 Jun;14(2):92-6.
3
Associated factors to cervical dentin hypersensitivity in adults: a transversal study.成人颈部牙本质过敏的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0616-1.
4
Prevalence of self-reported versus diagnosed dentinal hypersensitivity: a cross-sectional study and ROC curve analysis.自我报告的与诊断出的牙本质过敏患病率:一项横断面研究及ROC曲线分析
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Apr;77(3):219-223. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1536804. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Measurement of dentin hypersensitivity with the Jay Sensitivity Sensor Probe and the Yeaple probe to compare relief from dentin hypersensitivity by dentifrices.使用杰伊敏感传感器探头和耶普尔探头测量牙本质过敏症,以比较牙膏对牙本质过敏症的缓解效果。
Am J Dent. 2013 May;26 Spec No B:21B-28B.
6
An Exploratory Clinical Study to Monitor Clinical Efficacy of an Occluding Technology Dentifrice in Providing Short Term Relief from Dentinal Hypersensitivity.一项探索性临床研究,旨在监测一种封闭技术牙膏在短期内缓解牙本质过敏方面的临床疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2018 Mar;29(1):18-22.
7
The prevalence, clinical features, and related factors of dentin hypersensitivity in the Turkish population.土耳其人群中牙本质过敏的流行情况、临床特征及其相关因素。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2719-2732. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04245-4. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
8
Development of labeled magnitude scales for the assessment of pain of dentin hypersensitivity.用于评估牙本质过敏症疼痛的标记数字评分量表的开发。
J Orofac Pain. 2013 Winter;27(1):72-81. doi: 10.11607/jop.954.
9
Three randomized clinical trials to assess the short-term efficacy of anhydrous 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride dentifrices for the relief of dentin hypersensitivity.三项随机临床试验,以评估无水0.454%(重量/重量)氟化亚锡牙膏缓解牙本质过敏的短期疗效。
Am J Dent. 2016 Feb;29(1):25-32.
10
Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: a European population-based cross-sectional study.牙本质敏感症的患病率及相关因素研究:一项基于欧洲人群的横断面研究。
J Dent. 2013 Oct;41(10):841-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Herbal and Potassium Nitrate Toothpastes in Managing Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.草药牙膏与硝酸钾牙膏治疗牙本质敏感症的比较:一项随机对照试验
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;13(8):369. doi: 10.3390/dj13080369.
2
First-In-Human Study of Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of CPNE7-Derived Peptide (Selcopintide) for Dentin Hypersensitivity.CPNE7衍生肽(Selcopintide)用于牙本质过敏症的安全性、耐受性、疗效及药代动力学的首次人体研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug;18(8):e70326. doi: 10.1111/cts.70326.
3
Efficacy of bioactive glass-based desensitizer compared to other desensitizing agents or techniques in dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review.
与其他脱敏剂或技术相比,生物活性玻璃基脱敏剂治疗牙本质过敏症的疗效:一项系统评价
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06288-5.
4
In vivo and in situ evaluation of innovative approaches in dentin hypersensitivity treatment.牙本质过敏症治疗创新方法的体内和原位评估
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05865-y.
5
Comparative evaluation of application of bioactive glass desensitizer and dentin bonding agent on prepared vital tooth in postoperative sensitivity at varying time period before cementation: An observational study.生物活性玻璃脱敏剂与牙本质粘结剂在粘固前不同时间段应用于活髓牙预备后术后敏感性的比较评价:一项观察性研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Apr 1;25(2):120-124. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_433_24. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
6
Bioactive silicon-based dental gel associated with a calcium booster for dentin hypersensitivity treatment: A randomized clinical study.与钙增强剂联合使用的生物活性硅基牙科凝胶治疗牙本质过敏症的随机临床研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Dec 1;16(12):e1475-e1480. doi: 10.4317/jced.62205. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Home-use agents in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: clinical effectiveness evaluation with different measurement methods.家用药物治疗牙本质过敏症:不同测量方法的临床疗效评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 15;29(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06155-1.
8
Non-Invasive Strategies for Remineralization and Hypersensitivity Management in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.磨牙-切牙低矿化症再矿化及牙齿敏感管理的非侵入性策略——一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 26;13(23):7154. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237154.
9
A Pilot Investigation Into the Use of Teledentistry and Artificial Intelligence to Assess Dental Erosion in Competitive Swimmers.一项利用远程牙科和人工智能评估竞技游泳运动员牙酸蚀症的初步研究
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Dec;10(6):e70018. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70018.
10
Efficacy of seventh generation bonding agents as desensitizers in patients with dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial.第七代黏结剂作为牙本质过敏症患者脱敏剂的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 14;24(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04352-0.