• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

税务机关与纳税人的互动:基于权力和信任的社会困境中的遵从概念。

Tax authorities' interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust.

作者信息

Gangl Katharina, Hofmann Eva, Kirchler Erich

机构信息

University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology, Austria.

出版信息

New Ideas Psychol. 2015 Feb;37:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001
PMID:25859096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381354/
Abstract

Tax compliance represents a social dilemma in which the short-term self-interest to minimize tax payments is at odds with the collective long-term interest to provide sufficient tax funds for public goods. According to the Slippery Slope Framework, the social dilemma can be solved and tax compliance can be guaranteed by power of tax authorities and trust in tax authorities. The framework, however, remains silent on the dynamics between power and trust. The aim of the present theoretical paper is to conceptualize the dynamics between power and trust by differentiating coercive and legitimate power and reason-based and implicit trust. Insights into this dynamic are derived from an integration of a wide range of literature such as on organizational behavior and social influence. Conclusions on the effect of the dynamics between power and trust on the interaction climate between authorities and individuals and subsequent individual motivation of cooperation in social dilemmas such as tax contributions are drawn. Practically, the assumptions on the dynamics can be utilized by authorities to increase cooperation and to change the interaction climate from an antagonistic climate to a service and confidence climate.

摘要

税收遵从构成了一种社会困境,即尽量减少纳税的短期自身利益与为公共物品提供充足税收资金的集体长期利益相冲突。根据滑坡框架,社会困境可以通过税务机关的权力和对税务机关的信任来解决并确保税收遵从。然而,该框架对权力与信任之间的动态关系未作阐述。本理论论文的目的是通过区分强制权力和合法权力以及基于理性的信任和隐性信任来概念化权力与信任之间的动态关系。对这种动态关系的见解源自对广泛文献(如关于组织行为和社会影响的文献)的整合。得出了关于权力与信任之间的动态关系对当局与个人之间的互动氛围以及随后在诸如纳税等社会困境中个人合作动机的影响的结论。实际上,当局可以利用关于这种动态关系的假设来促进合作,并将互动氛围从对抗性氛围转变为服务和信任氛围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c6/4381354/587de70ec472/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c6/4381354/c35317ab93e6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c6/4381354/b69d4771940e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c6/4381354/587de70ec472/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c6/4381354/c35317ab93e6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c6/4381354/b69d4771940e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c6/4381354/587de70ec472/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Tax authorities' interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust.税务机关与纳税人的互动:基于权力和信任的社会困境中的遵从概念。
New Ideas Psychol. 2015 Feb;37:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001.
2
The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary.权威机构与信任纳税人的影响:来自奥地利、芬兰和匈牙利的扩展滑坡框架证据。
Policy Stud. 2019 Feb 11;41(1):98-111. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375. eCollection 2020.
3
Enhancing Tax Compliance through Coercive and Legitimate Power of Tax Authorities by Concurrently Diminishing or Facilitating Trust in Tax Authorities.通过税务机关的强制力和合法权力来提高税收遵从度,同时减少或促进对税务机关的信任。
Law Policy. 2014 Jul;36(3):290-313. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12021.
4
Authorities' Coercive and Legitimate Power: The Impact on Cognitions Underlying Cooperation.当局的强制力与合法权力:对合作背后认知的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 18;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00005. eCollection 2017.
5
The Relationship Between Austrian Tax Auditors and Self-Employed Taxpayers: Evidence From a Qualitative Study.奥地利税务审计员与个体经营纳税人之间的关系:来自定性研究的证据
Front Psychol. 2019 May 13;10:1034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034. eCollection 2019.
6
A dataset on declared tax evasion attitudes of students and entrepreneurs from Poland under the slippery slope framework.在滑坡框架下,关于波兰学生和企业家申报逃税态度的数据集。
Data Brief. 2023 Apr 25;48:109183. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109183. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Does the sole description of a tax authority affect tax evasion?--the impact of described coercive and legitimate power.税务机关的单一描述会影响逃税行为吗?——所描述的强制力和合法权力的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 29;10(4):e0123355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123355. eCollection 2015.
8
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
9
Make Me Want to Pay. A Three-Way Interaction Between Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, and Power on Voluntary Tax Compliance.让我想要纳税。程序正义、分配正义和权力对自愿纳税遵从的三方交互作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632. eCollection 2019.
10
Dilemma of dilemmas: how collective and individual perspectives can clarify the size dilemma in voluntary linear public goods dilemmas.两难困境中的两难:集体视角与个体视角如何阐明自愿线性公共物品两难中的规模困境
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0120379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120379. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Supervisors' power to deal with employees' inner resignation: How perceived power of the organization and the supervisor relate to employees' voluntary and enforced work behavior.主管处理员工内心离职情绪的权力:组织和主管的感知权力如何与员工的自愿和强制工作行为相关联。
Eur Manag J. 2021 Apr;39(2):260-269. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
2
Determinants of the Financial Contribution to the NHS: The Case of the COVID-19 Emergency in Italy.对英国国家医疗服务体系财政贡献的决定因素:以意大利的新冠疫情紧急情况为例
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 13;11:584473. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584473. eCollection 2020.
3
Public policies and tax evasion: evidence from SAARC countries.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust, Punishment, and Cooperation Across 18 Societies: A Meta-Analysis.信任、惩罚与合作:跨越 18 个社会的综合分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):363-79. doi: 10.1177/1745691613488533.
2
Enhancing Tax Compliance through Coercive and Legitimate Power of Tax Authorities by Concurrently Diminishing or Facilitating Trust in Tax Authorities.通过税务机关的强制力和合法权力来提高税收遵从度,同时减少或促进对税务机关的信任。
Law Policy. 2014 Jul;36(3):290-313. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12021.
3
Organizational climate and culture.组织氛围和文化。
公共政策与逃税:来自南盟国家的证据。
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 11;6(11):e05449. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05449. eCollection 2020 Nov.
4
The Influence of Regulation on Trust and Risk Preference in Sharing Communities.监管对共享社区中信任和风险偏好的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 30;11:1369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01369. eCollection 2020.
5
The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary.权威机构与信任纳税人的影响:来自奥地利、芬兰和匈牙利的扩展滑坡框架证据。
Policy Stud. 2019 Feb 11;41(1):98-111. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375. eCollection 2020.
6
Make Me Want to Pay. A Three-Way Interaction Between Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, and Power on Voluntary Tax Compliance.让我想要纳税。程序正义、分配正义和权力对自愿纳税遵从的三方交互作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632. eCollection 2019.
7
The Relationship Between Austrian Tax Auditors and Self-Employed Taxpayers: Evidence From a Qualitative Study.奥地利税务审计员与个体经营纳税人之间的关系:来自定性研究的证据
Front Psychol. 2019 May 13;10:1034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034. eCollection 2019.
8
Social frame and tax compliance modulate electrophysiological and autonomic responses following tax-related decisions.社会框架和纳税遵从度调节与纳税决策相关的电生理和自主反应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4713. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41156-7.
9
Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty: evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments.强制性和合法权威对纳税诚信的影响:来自行为和ERP实验的证据
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jul 1;12(7):1108-1117. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx029.
10
Authorities' Coercive and Legitimate Power: The Impact on Cognitions Underlying Cooperation.当局的强制力与合法权力:对合作背后认知的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 18;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00005. eCollection 2017.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:361-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
4
Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis.奖励、惩罚与合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):594-615. doi: 10.1037/a0023489.
5
Tax Compliance Inventory: TAX-I Voluntary tax compliance, enforced tax compliance, tax avoidance, and tax evasion.税收合规清单:TAX-I 自愿税收合规、强制税收合规、避税和逃税。
J Econ Psychol. 2010 Jun;31(3):331-346. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.002.
6
Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth.体验身体温暖会促进人际温暖。
Science. 2008 Oct 24;322(5901):606-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1162548.
7
Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.推理、判断和社会认知的双加工理论
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
8
Procedural justice in punishment systems: inconsistent punishment procedures have detrimental effects on cooperation.刑罚制度中的程序正义:不一致的惩罚程序对合作有不利影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):311-24. doi: 10.1348/014466607X218212. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
9
Beyond frequency: habit as mental construct.超越频率:作为心理建构的习惯
Br J Soc Psychol. 2006 Sep;45(Pt 3):639-56. doi: 10.1348/014466605X49122.
10
Interests, relationships, identities: three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment.兴趣、人际关系、身份认同:个人和群体在应对其社会环境时面临的三个核心问题。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190156.