Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS Genet. 2020 May 14;16(5):e1008791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008791. eCollection 2020 May.
The genetics of domestication has been extensively studied ever since the rediscovery of Mendel's law of inheritance and much has been learned about the genetic control of trait differences between crops and their ancestors. Here, we ask how domestication has altered genetic architecture by comparing the genetic architecture of 18 domestication traits in maize and its ancestor teosinte using matched populations. We observed a strongly reduced number of QTL for domestication traits in maize relative to teosinte, which is consistent with the previously reported depletion of additive variance by selection during domestication. We also observed more dominance in maize than teosinte, likely a consequence of selective removal of additive variants. We observed that large effect QTL have low minor allele frequency (MAF) in both maize and teosinte. Regions of the genome that are strongly differentiated between teosinte and maize (high FST) explain less quantitative variation in maize than teosinte, suggesting that, in these regions, allelic variants were brought to (or near) fixation during domestication. We also observed that genomic regions of high recombination explain a disproportionately large proportion of heritable variance both before and after domestication. Finally, we observed that about 75% of the additive variance in both teosinte and maize is "missing" in the sense that it cannot be ascribed to detectable QTL and only 25% of variance maps to specific QTL. This latter result suggests that morphological evolution during domestication is largely attributable to very large numbers of QTL of very small effect.
自从孟德尔遗传定律重新发现以来,人们对驯化的遗传学进行了广泛的研究,并且已经了解了作物与其祖先之间性状差异的遗传控制。在这里,我们通过比较玉米及其祖先大刍草的 18 个驯化性状的遗传结构,来探讨驯化如何改变了遗传结构。我们观察到玉米中驯化性状的 QTL 数量明显少于大刍草,这与驯化过程中选择导致加性方差耗竭的先前报道一致。我们还观察到玉米中的显性作用比大刍草更多,这可能是选择去除加性变异的结果。我们观察到,大效应 QTL 在玉米和大刍草中都具有低的次要等位基因频率(MAF)。大刍草和玉米之间分化强烈的基因组区域(高 FST)在玉米中解释的数量变异小于大刍草,这表明在这些区域,等位变异在驯化过程中被带到(或接近)固定。我们还观察到,高重组区域在驯化前后解释了不成比例的大比例的可遗传变异。最后,我们观察到,在大刍草和玉米中,大约 75%的加性方差“缺失”,也就是说,它不能归因于可检测到的 QTL,只有 25%的方差映射到特定的 QTL。后一结果表明,驯化过程中的形态进化主要归因于非常大量的小效应 QTL。