Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Department of Plant Protection, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0233171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233171. eCollection 2020.
Intercropping legumes with cereals has been a common cropping system in short-season rainfed environments due to its increased productivity and sustainability. Intercropping barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) could increase the grain yield of barley and improve resource use efficiency of the intercropping system. However, non-optimum planting geometry has been a hurdle in the adaptation of barley-based cropping systems. This study was aimed at optimizing the planting geometry, and assess the productivity and profitability of barley-Egyptian clover intercropping system. Ten different planting geometries, differing in number of rows of barley, width and number of irrigation furrows and planting method were tested. Intercropping barley with Egyptian clover improved 56-68% grain yield of barley compared with mono-cropped barley. Barley remained dominant crop in terms of aggressiveness, relative crowding coefficient and competitive ratio. The amount of water used was linearly increased with increasing size of barley strip from 3 to 8 rows. The highest water use efficiency (4.83 kg/cf3) was recorded for 8-row barley strip system with 120 cm irrigation furrows compared to rest of the planting geometries. In conclusion, 8-rows of barley planted on beds with Egyptian clover in 120 cm irrigation furrows had the highest net income and cost benefit ratio. Therefore, it is recommended that this planting geometry can be used for better economic returns of barley-Egyptian clover intercropping system. However, barley strips with >8 rows were not included in this study, which is limitation of the current study. Therefore, future studies with >8 barley rows in strip should be conducted to infer the economic feasibility and profitability of wider barley strips.
在短季雨养环境中,由于间作可以提高生产力和可持续性,因此豆类与谷物间作一直是一种常见的种植系统。在大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)与埃及三叶草(Trifolium alexandrinum L.)间作中加入大麦可以增加大麦的产量,并提高间作系统的资源利用效率。然而,非最佳的种植几何形状一直是适应基于大麦的种植系统的一个障碍。本研究旨在优化种植几何形状,并评估大麦-埃及三叶草间作系统的生产力和盈利能力。测试了十种不同的种植几何形状,这些形状在大麦行数、宽度和灌溉沟数以及种植方式上有所不同。与单作大麦相比,大麦与埃及三叶草间作可提高 56-68%的大麦产量。在侵略性、相对拥挤系数和竞争比方面,大麦仍然是优势作物。随着大麦条带宽度从 3 行增加到 8 行,用水量呈线性增加。与其他种植几何形状相比,120cm 灌溉沟种植 8 行大麦条带系统的水分利用效率最高(4.83kg/cf3)。结论是,在 120cm 灌溉沟中种植埃及三叶草的 8 行大麦具有最高的净收入和成本效益比。因此,建议采用这种种植几何形状可以提高大麦-埃及三叶草间作系统的经济效益。然而,本研究未包括>8 行的大麦条带,这是当前研究的局限性。因此,应该进行更多行大麦条带的研究,以推断更宽大麦条带的经济可行性和盈利能力。