Williams Travis, Athrey Giridhar
Department of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, 101 Kleberg Center, 2472 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2472, USA.
Faculty of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Texas A&M University, 101 Kleberg Center, 2472 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2472, USA.
Microorganisms. 2020 May 12;8(5):718. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8050718.
The gastrointestinal microbiota of chickens plays a central role in health and performance. Cloacal swabs, due to their proximity to the ceca (a vital site of functional activity), are an alternative, non-invasive method used for assaying microbial communities and might be a viable option for longitudinal studies. In this study, the microbiota of twenty paired cecal content and cloacal swab samples representing two dietary treatments was assessed using 16S rRNA V4 hypervariable region sequencing and was analyzed using the MOTHUR pipeline, Phyloseq, and Vegan packages. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed significant differences in the Chao1 index (-value <0.0001 and -value <0.0001, respectively) but not in the Inverse Simpson species diversity estimator (-value = 0.06763 and -value = 0.06021, respectively) between the cecal content and cloacal swabs. β-diversity between the cloacal swabs and cecal microbiota also showed significant differences using PERMANOVA, HOMOVA, and weighted UniFrac testing (-values < 0.001). Based on a paired sample analysis, this study provided evidence of the high inter-individual variation and randomness of cloacal microbiota, in contrast to cecal microbiota. Our findings indicated that cloacal swabs do not approximate the α or β diversity of cecal samples and are not suitable for longitudinal studies of gut microbiota.
鸡的胃肠道微生物群在健康和生产性能方面起着核心作用。泄殖腔拭子由于靠近盲肠(功能活动的重要部位),是一种用于检测微生物群落的替代非侵入性方法,可能是纵向研究的一个可行选择。在本研究中,使用16S rRNA V4高变区测序对代表两种饮食处理的20对盲肠内容物和泄殖腔拭子样本的微生物群进行了评估,并使用MOTHUR管道、Phyloseq和Vegan软件包进行了分析。配对t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示,盲肠内容物和泄殖腔拭子之间的Chao1指数存在显著差异(p值分别<0.0001和<0.0001),但逆辛普森物种多样性估计值没有显著差异(p值分别=0.06763和=0.06021)。使用PERMANOVA、HOMOVA和加权UniFrac检验,泄殖腔拭子和盲肠微生物群之间的β多样性也显示出显著差异(p值<0.001)。基于配对样本分析,本研究提供了证据,表明与盲肠微生物群相比,泄殖腔微生物群存在高度的个体间变异和随机性。我们的研究结果表明,泄殖腔拭子不能近似盲肠样本的α或β多样性,不适用于肠道微生物群的纵向研究。