Liu Peng, Liu Silvia, Fang Yusi, Xue Xiangning, Zou Jian, Tseng George, Konnikova Liza
Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Apr 28;8:234. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00234. eCollection 2020.
The progress in the field of high-dimensional cytometry has greatly increased the number of markers that can be simultaneously analyzed producing datasets with large numbers of parameters. Traditional biaxial manual gating might not be optimal for such datasets. To overcome this, a large number of automated tools have been developed to aid with cellular clustering of multi-dimensional datasets. Here were review two large categories of such tools; unsupervised and supervised clustering tools. After a thorough review of the popularity and use of each of the available unsupervised clustering tools, we focus on the top six tools to discuss their advantages and limitations. Furthermore, we employ a publicly available dataset to directly compare the usability, speed, and relative effectiveness of the available unsupervised and supervised tools. Finally, we discuss the current challenges for existing methods and future direction for the new generation of cell type identification approaches.
高维细胞术领域的进展极大地增加了可同时分析的标志物数量,从而产生具有大量参数的数据集。传统的双轴手动设门可能不适用于此类数据集。为了克服这一问题,已经开发了大量自动化工具来辅助多维数据集的细胞聚类。在此,我们回顾两大类此类工具:无监督和有监督聚类工具。在全面回顾了每种可用的无监督聚类工具的受欢迎程度和使用情况后,我们重点关注排名前六位的工具,以讨论它们的优点和局限性。此外,我们使用一个公开可用的数据集来直接比较可用的无监督和有监督工具的可用性、速度和相对有效性。最后,我们讨论现有方法当前面临的挑战以及新一代细胞类型识别方法的未来方向。