Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Stoystrasse 3, 07740, Jena, Germany.
German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Strasse 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 15;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01002-1.
Cancer patients have to undergo a difficult medical therapy and are also confronted with various psychological, social and economic problems. Support is available from many providers, but patients often gain no access to it. Accordingly, there is a need for a single point of contact that can provide advice, information and assistance. In the state of Saarland, Germany, a supportive new consulting and information path (PIKKO) for all types of cancer is currently evaluated by the German Cancer Society, the Cancer Society of the Saarland, three statutory health insurances and the Jena University Hospital. PIKKO is designed to improve quality of life, self-efficacy, health literacy and patient satisfaction and to reduce psychological distress, related health care costs and the days of inability to work. This methodical work presents the process and analysis planning of this evaluation.
The study population includes all cancer types, both new and existing diseases. PIKKO (with patient navigator, oncological knowledge database, specialized oncological counseling) is evaluated within a controlled, non-randomized, comparative, multicenter, longitudinal design. In addition to patient surveys, data from statutory health insurances and utilization data from the web database are collected, and interviews with patient navigators and doctors are carried out. Patients are assigned to a control (usual care) or an intervention group (u. c. + PIKKO). Primary outcome is the health related quality of life (SF-12) six months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy (GSE), psychological distress such as depression (PHQ-9) or anxiety (GAD-7), health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47) and patient satisfaction in health care (Qualiskope-A). Furthermore, the time course of direct costs of medical care (e.g. work disability days) and usage data of the intervention modules are analyzed. Among other statistical procedures, we use t-tests, univariate tests and growth curve models.
If PIKKO proves to be effective, recommendations can be made to health organizations, which should lead to the concept being rolled out throughout Germany and included into oncological guidelines. We expect PIKKO to be a useful addition to usual cancer care, helping to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and reduce healthcare costs.
This study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trial Register under DRKS00016703 (21.02.2019, the reason for the delay was the prioritization of the study management in the first year to establish the new approach into practice). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016703.
癌症患者不仅要接受艰难的医学治疗,还要面对各种心理、社会和经济问题。许多机构都提供支持,但患者往往无法获得这些支持。因此,需要一个单一的联系点,可以提供咨询、信息和帮助。在德国萨尔州,德国癌症协会、萨尔州癌症协会、三家法定健康保险公司和耶拿大学医院正在对一种针对所有类型癌症的新的支持性咨询和信息途径(PIKKO)进行评估。PIKKO 的目的是提高生活质量、自我效能、健康素养和患者满意度,降低心理困扰、相关医疗保健费用和无法工作的天数。本研究报告了该评估的过程和分析计划。
研究人群包括所有癌症类型,包括新发和既往疾病。PIKKO(患者导航员、肿瘤学知识库、专门的肿瘤学咨询)在一项对照、非随机、比较、多中心、纵向设计中进行评估。除了患者调查外,还收集了法定健康保险的数据和网络数据库的使用数据,并对患者导航员和医生进行了访谈。患者被分配到对照组(常规护理)或干预组(常规护理+PIKKO)。主要结局是基线后 6 个月的健康相关生活质量(SF-12)。次要结局包括自我效能(GSE)、抑郁(PHQ-9)或焦虑(GAD-7)等心理困扰、健康素养(HLS-EU-Q47)和医疗保健满意度(Qualiskope-A)。此外,还分析了医疗费用的直接成本(如工作残疾天数)和干预模块的使用数据。除了其他统计程序外,我们还使用 t 检验、单变量检验和增长曲线模型。
如果 PIKKO 被证明有效,我们可以向卫生组织提出建议,这将导致该概念在德国推广,并纳入肿瘤学指南。我们预计 PIKKO 将成为常规癌症护理的有益补充,有助于提高癌症患者的生活质量,降低医疗保健成本。
该研究于 2019 年 2 月 21 日在德国临床试验注册处(DRKS)登记,注册号为 DRKS00016703(延迟的原因是第一年优先考虑研究管理,以便将新方法付诸实践)。https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016703。