• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少粮食不安全的政策:道德的必然要求。

Policies to reduce food insecurity: An ethical imperative.

机构信息

Boston University School of Social Work, 264 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215, U.S..

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2020 Aug 1;222:112943. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112943. Epub 2020 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112943
PMID:32417646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7255147/
Abstract

A quarter of U.S. households receive food assistance, yet more than 11% still experience food insecurity annually. We argue that an expansion-oriented approach to food and nutrition assistance policy is an ethical imperative. Drawing on values from the Capability Approach and Social Empathy Model and supported by empirical evidence, we propose an ethical framework characterized by four principles that can be used to assess and inform the development of just food policies. We argue that policies should (1) embrace compassion, (2) create opportunity, (3) consider essential needs, and (4) promote knowledge and empathy. In an applied case, we evaluate current SNAP policy in terms of those principles and offer recommendations to promote justice in the design and implementation of SNAP and other food policies.

摘要

四分之一的美国家庭接受食品援助,但仍有超过 11%的家庭每年经历粮食不安全。我们认为,扩大面向的食品和营养援助政策方法是一种道德需要。我们借鉴能力方法和社会共情模型中的价值观,并以经验证据为支持,提出了一个以四项原则为特征的道德框架,可用于评估和为公正的食品政策制定提供信息。我们认为,政策应该:(1) 体现同情心;(2) 创造机会;(3) 考虑基本需求;(4) 促进知识和同理心。在一个应用案例中,我们根据这些原则评估当前的 SNAP 政策,并提出建议,以促进 SNAP 和其他食品政策在设计和实施中的公正。

相似文献

1
Policies to reduce food insecurity: An ethical imperative.减少粮食不安全的政策:道德的必然要求。
Physiol Behav. 2020 Aug 1;222:112943. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112943. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Does Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Reduce Food Insecurity among Households with Children? Evidence from the Current Population Survey.补充营养援助计划是否减少了有孩子家庭的粮食不安全状况?来自当前人口调查的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;18(6):3178. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063178.
3
County- and state-level immigration policies are associated with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation among Latino households.县级和州级移民政策与拉丁裔家庭参与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)有关。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Sep;333:116141. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116141. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
4
SNAP timing and food insecurity.SNAP 时间和粮食不安全。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0246946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246946. eCollection 2021.
5
Connecting Families at Risk for Food Insecurity With Nutrition Assistance Through a Clinical-Community Direct Referral Model.通过临床-社区直接转介模式将面临粮食不安全风险的家庭与营养援助联系起来。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 Feb;54(2):181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.09.014.
6
Examining Differential Item Functioning in the Household Food Insecurity Scale: Does Participation in SNAP Affect Measurement Invariance?检验家庭粮食不安全量表中的项目功能差异:参与补充营养援助计划是否会影响测量不变性?
J Appl Meas. 2019;20(1):100-111.
7
Trends in Food Insecurity Among Households with Children Participating in WIC and SNAP in California, 2005-2017.2005-2017 年加利福尼亚参加 WIC 和 SNAP 的有子女家庭的粮食不安全趋势。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Feb;28(2):315-323. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03829-8. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
8
Measuring the Effects of a Demonstration to Reduce Childhood Food Insecurity: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Nevada Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Project.衡量减少儿童食物不安全示范活动的效果:内华达州健康无饥饿儿童项目的随机对照试验。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Jan;121(1S):S22-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.03.002.
9
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Access and Racial Disparities in Food Insecurity.补充营养援助计划的获得情况与粮食不安全方面的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2320196. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20196.
10
Ensuring the dignity and autonomy of SNAP recipients.确保补充营养援助计划(SNAP)受益人的尊严和自主权。
Physiol Behav. 2020 Jul 1;221:112909. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112909. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between early-pandemic food assistance use and subsequent food security trajectories among households in Washington State during the first three years of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情头三年间,华盛顿州家庭在疫情早期使用食品援助与后续粮食安全轨迹之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0321585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321585. eCollection 2025.
2
Food Insecurity in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients.小儿肾移植受者的粮食不安全状况
Pediatr Transplant. 2025 Jun;29(4):e70091. doi: 10.1111/petr.70091.
3
Editorial: Nutrition in vulnerable groups.社论:弱势群体的营养问题。
Front Nutr. 2024 Sep 6;11:1448870. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1448870. eCollection 2024.
4
The Importance of Philanthropy Foundation for the Future Sustainability of Agriculture and Nutrition: An Opinion Study on Practical Applications, Policies, and Strategies.慈善基金会对农业与营养未来可持续发展的重要性:关于实际应用、政策及策略的观点研究
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 10;16(8):1119. doi: 10.3390/nu16081119.
5
Hunger, Food Security, and Sovereignty: A Need for Evidence-Based Public Health Approaches to Meet Sustainable Development Goals.饥饿、粮食安全与主权:需要基于证据的公共卫生方法来实现可持续发展目标。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Aug 22;68:1605956. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605956. eCollection 2023.
6
Older Adult Mortality From COVID-19: Food Access as a Determinant Within a Socio-ecological Framework.老年人 COVID-19 死亡率:社会生态框架内的食物获取决定因素。
Gerontologist. 2022 Mar 28;62(3):452-463. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab159.
7
Doctors have an ethical obligation to ask patients about food insecurity: what is stopping us?医生有道义上的责任询问患者粮食不安全问题:是什么阻碍了我们?
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 14;48(10):707-11. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107409.

本文引用的文献

1
U.S food insecurity and population trends with a focus on adults with disabilities.美国的粮食不安全状况与人口趋势,重点关注残疾成年人。
Physiol Behav. 2020 Jun 1;220:112865. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112865. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
2
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Improves Children's Health Care Use: An Analysis of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's Natural Experiment.补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的参与改善了儿童的医疗保健利用情况:对美国复苏与再投资法案自然实验的分析。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Aug;20(6):863-870. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
3
Moving Beyond the Debate Over Restricting Sugary Drinks in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.超越关于在补充营养援助计划中限制含糖饮料的争论。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb;52(2 Suppl 2):S199-S205. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.022.
4
Longitudinal Trajectories of Food Insecurity Among Children of Immigrants.移民子女粮食不安全状况的纵向轨迹
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Feb;20(1):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0516-x.
5
Estimating the risk of food stamp use and impoverishment during childhood.评估儿童时期使用食品券和陷入贫困的风险。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Nov;163(11):994-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.178.
6
Sources of stigma for means-tested government programs.针对收入调查式政府项目的污名化来源。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(4):933-45. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.012. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
7
Likelihood of using food stamps during the adulthood years.成年期使用食品券的可能性。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005 May-Jun;37(3):137-46. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60268-6.