Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Neurosci Bull. 2020 Oct;36(10):1191-1212. doi: 10.1007/s12264-020-00501-x. Epub 2020 May 16.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising method for altering cortical excitability with clinical implications. It has been increasingly used in neurodevelopmental disorders, especially attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but its efficacy (based on effect size calculations), safety, and stimulation parameters have not been systematically examined. In this systematic review, we aimed to (1) explore the effectiveness of tDCS on the clinical symptoms and neuropsychological deficits of ADHD patients, (2) evaluate the safety of tDCS application, especially in children with ADHD, (3) model the electrical field intensity in the target regions based on the commonly-applied and effective versus less-effective protocols, and (4) discuss and propose advanced tDCS parameters. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, a literature search identified 14 empirical experiments investigating tDCS effects in ADHD. Partial improving effects of tDCS on cognitive deficits (response inhibition, working memory, attention, and cognitive flexibility) or clinical symptoms (e.g., impulsivity and inattention) are reported in 10 studies. No serious adverse effects are reported in 747 sessions of tDCS. The left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex are the regions most often targeted, and anodal tDCS the protocol most often applied. An intensity of 2 mA induced stronger electrical fields than 1 mA in adults with ADHD and was associated with significant behavioral changes. In ADHD children, however, the electrical field induced by 1 mA, which is likely larger than the electrical field induced by 1 mA in adults due to the smaller head size of children, was sufficient to result in significant behavioral change. Overall, tDCS seems to be a promising method for improving ADHD deficits. However, the clinical utility of tDCS in ADHD cannot yet be concluded and requires further systematic investigation in larger sample sizes. Cortical regions involved in ADHD pathophysiology, stimulation parameters (e.g. intensity, duration, polarity, and electrode size), and types of symptom/deficit are potential determinants of tDCS efficacy in ADHD. Developmental aspects of tDCS in childhood ADHD should be considered as well.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种有前途的改变皮质兴奋性的方法,具有临床意义。它已越来越多地用于神经发育障碍,特别是注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD),但其疗效(基于效应量计算)、安全性和刺激参数尚未得到系统检查。在这项系统评价中,我们旨在:(1)探讨 tDCS 对 ADHD 患者临床症状和神经心理学缺陷的影响;(2)评估 tDCS 应用的安全性,特别是在 ADHD 儿童中;(3)基于常用且有效的与效果较差的方案,对目标区域的电场强度进行建模;(4)讨论并提出先进的 tDCS 参数。使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目方法,文献检索确定了 14 项关于 tDCS 对 ADHD 影响的实证研究。10 项研究报告了 tDCS 对认知缺陷(反应抑制、工作记忆、注意力和认知灵活性)或临床症状(如冲动和注意力不集中)的部分改善作用。在 747 次 tDCS 治疗中未报告严重不良事件。左、右背外侧前额叶皮质是最常被靶向的区域,而阳极 tDCS 是最常应用的方案。与 ADHD 成人相比,1mA 引起的电场强度比 2mA 更强,与显著的行为变化相关。然而,在 ADHD 儿童中,1mA 诱导的电场强度可能大于成人,因为儿童的头部较小,这足以导致显著的行为变化。总体而言,tDCS 似乎是改善 ADHD 缺陷的一种有前途的方法。然而,tDCS 在 ADHD 中的临床应用尚不能得出结论,需要在更大的样本量中进行进一步的系统研究。ADHD 病理生理学中涉及的皮质区域、刺激参数(例如强度、持续时间、极性和电极大小)以及症状/缺陷类型是 tDCS 在 ADHD 中疗效的潜在决定因素。还应考虑儿童 ADHD 中 tDCS 的发展方面。