Suppr超能文献

使用工作负荷敏锐度评分开发护理任务工具。

Development of a Nursing Assignment Tool Using Workload Acuity Scores.

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Director of Staff Education and Informatics (Ms Meyer), Mt Ascutney Hospital and Health Center, Windsor, Vermont; and Informatics Nurse Specialist (Ms Fraser), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; and Research Scientist (Dr Emeny), The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

出版信息

J Nurs Adm. 2020 Jun;50(6):322-327. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000892.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine a just and consistent practice for creating nursing assignments.

BACKGROUND

Traditional methods of assigning patients to nurses may lead to unbalanced nursing workload. This article describes the ongoing, hospital-wide effort to evaluate and implement a nursing assignment tool based on electronic health record (EHR) functionality and auto-calculated nursing workload scores.

METHODS

EHR records of individual patient workload scores from all hospital units were collected from August 2017 to June 2018. A nurse-specific total workload score was summed for each staff. Then, each hospital unit's mean nurse workload score and standard deviation, along with the unit's nurse-to-patient ratio, were used to calculate levels of high, medium, and low nursing workload measurement (NWM).

RESULTS

Mean patient-specific workload scores varied greatly across hospital units. Unit-specific nurse-to-patient ratios were factored into NWM scores to create ranges for assignments that were relatively consistent across the institution.

CONCLUSION

The use of objective, electronically generated nursing workload scores, combined with traditional nurse-to-patient ratios, provides accurate real-time nurse staffing needs that can inform best practice in staffing. The confirmation of individual patient workload scores and an appreciation for the complexity of EHR vendor rules are necessary for successful implementation. Automation ensures patient safety, staff satisfaction, and optimal resource allocation.

摘要

目的

确定一种公正且一致的护理分配实践方法。

背景

传统的患者分配给护士的方法可能导致护理工作量不平衡。本文描述了一项正在进行的、全院范围内的努力,旨在评估和实施一种基于电子健康记录 (EHR) 功能和自动计算的护理工作量评分的护理分配工具。

方法

从 2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 6 月,收集了来自所有医院科室的个体患者工作量评分的 EHR 记录。为每位员工汇总了特定护士的总工作量评分。然后,使用每个医院科室的平均护士工作量评分和标准差,以及科室的护士与患者比例,计算高、中、低护理工作量测量 (NWM) 水平。

结果

各医院科室的患者特定工作量评分差异很大。将科室特定的护士与患者比例纳入 NWM 评分,以创建在整个机构内相对一致的分配范围。

结论

使用客观的、电子生成的护理工作量评分,并结合传统的护士与患者比例,提供准确的实时护士人员配置需求,可以为人员配置的最佳实践提供信息。确认个体患者工作量评分并了解电子健康记录供应商规则的复杂性是成功实施的必要条件。自动化可确保患者安全、员工满意度和最佳资源分配。

相似文献

1
Development of a Nursing Assignment Tool Using Workload Acuity Scores.
J Nurs Adm. 2020 Jun;50(6):322-327. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000892.
2
Assessing nursing staffing ratios: variability in workload intensity.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2007 Feb;8(1):7-19. doi: 10.1177/1527154407300999.
3
The relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes.
J Nurs Adm. 2003 Sep;33(9):478-85. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200309000-00008.
5
Nurse staffing and patient perceptions of nursing care.
J Nurs Adm. 2003 Nov;33(11):607-14. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200311000-00011.
7
A response to California's mandated nursing ratios.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(2):179-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00179.x.
8
Nurse-patient assignment models considering patient acuity metrics and nurses' perceived workload.
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Jun;55:237-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
10
Decision making for nurse staffing: Canadian perspectives.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2006 Nov;7(4):261-9. doi: 10.1177/1527154406297799.

引用本文的文献

4
Burden of nursing care: a concept analysis.
Rev Cuid. 2024 Sep 19;15(3):e3848. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.3848. eCollection 2024 Sep-Dec.
5
Nursing workload: use of artificial intelligence to develop a classifier model.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Jul 5;32:e4239. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7131.4239. eCollection 2024.
8
Derivation of a Unique, Algorithm-Based Approach to Cancer Patient Navigator Workload Management.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 May;7:e2200170. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00170.
10
Differences in the Incidence of Adverse Events in Acute Care Hospitals: Results of a Multicentre Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095238.

本文引用的文献

2
Taking nurse staffing research to the unit level.
Nurs Manage. 2018 Jul;49(7):42-48. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000538915.53159.b5.
3
Why Causal Inference Matters to Nurses: The Case of Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes.
Online J Issues Nurs. 2016 May 31;21(2):2. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol21No02Man02.
4
Donabedian's Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 21;375(3):205-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605101.
5
Nursing workload: a concept analysis.
J Nurs Manag. 2016 May;24(4):449-57. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12354. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
6
"The pure hard slog that nursing is . . .": a qualitative analysis of nursing work.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Sep;46(5):377-88. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12090.
8
Hospital nurse staffing: choice of measure matters.
Med Care. 2011 Aug;49(8):775-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318222a6df.
9
Nurse staffing and inpatient hospital mortality.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):1037-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1001025.
10
Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction.
JAMA. 2002;288(16):1987-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验