Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.LB), Brussels, Belgium.
European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
ESMO Open. 2020 May;5(Suppl 3):e000793. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000793.
The global preparedness and response to the rapid escalation to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2-related disease (COVID-19) to a pandemic proportion has demanded the formulation of a reliable, useful and evidence-based mechanism for health services prioritisation, to achieve the highest quality standards of care to all patients. The prioritisation of high value cancer interventions must be embedded in the agenda for the pandemic response, ensuring that no inconsistency or discrepancy emerge in the health planning processes.The aim of this work is to organise health interventions for breast cancer management and research in a tiered framework (high, medium, low value), formulating a scheme of prioritisation per clinical cogency and intrinsic value or magnitude of benefit. The public health tools and schemes for priority setting in oncology have been used as models, aspiring to capture clinical urgency, value in healthcare, community goals and fairness, while respecting the principles of benevolence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice.We discuss the priority health interventions across the cancer continuum, giving a perspective on the role and meaning to maintain some services (undeferrable) while temporarily abrogate some others (deferrable). Considerations for implementation and the essential link to pre-existing health services, especially primary healthcare, are addressed, outlining a framework for the development of effective and functional services, such as telemedicine.The discussion covers the theme of health systems strategising, and why oncology care, in particular breast cancer care, should be maintained in parallel to pandemic control measures, providing a pragmatic clinical model within the broader context of public healthcare schemes.
全球对严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)相关疾病(COVID-19)迅速升级至大流行规模的准备和应对,要求制定一种可靠、有用和基于证据的卫生服务优先排序机制,以实现对所有患者的最高质量标准的护理。高价值癌症干预措施的优先排序必须纳入大流行应对议程,确保在卫生规划过程中不会出现不一致或差异。
这项工作的目的是在分层框架(高、中、低价值)中组织乳腺癌管理和研究的卫生干预措施,根据临床相关性和内在价值或受益程度制定优先排序方案。公共卫生工具和肿瘤学中的优先排序方案已被用作模型,旨在捕捉临床紧迫性、医疗保健中的价值、社区目标和公平性,同时尊重仁爱、不伤害、自主和正义的原则。
我们讨论了贯穿整个癌症的优先卫生干预措施,从维持某些服务(不可推迟)和暂时放弃某些服务(可推迟)的角度探讨了其作用和意义。考虑了实施的考虑因素以及与现有卫生服务的重要联系,特别是初级卫生保健,概述了发展有效和功能性服务的框架,如远程医疗。
讨论涵盖了卫生系统战略制定的主题,以及为什么肿瘤学护理,特别是乳腺癌护理,应该与大流行控制措施并行进行,在更广泛的公共医疗保健计划背景下提供实用的临床模式。