Suppr超能文献

通过[具体方法1]和[具体方法2]使用去离子水和磁化水的固体脂质纳米粒(SLN)和纳米结构脂质载体(NLC)的保湿效果。

Moisturizing effects of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) using deionized and magnetized water by and methods.

作者信息

Sarhadi Susan, Gholizadeh Mostafa, Moghadasian Tina, Golmohammadzadeh Shiva

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2020 Mar;23(3):337-343. doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2020.39587.9397.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to determine and compare moisturizing and occlusion effects of different solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) using magnetized water and deionized water.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SLN formulations were prepared using various lipids, including Tripalmitin, Compritol®, Precirol®, and emulsifiers including Poloxamer and Tween 80. NLC formulations were also prepared with oleic acid and the same solid lipids. Two types of formulations were prepared; first with deionized water and then with magnetized water. Formulations were prepared using high shear homogenization and ultrasound methods. The products were analyzed by PSA (particle size analyzer), DSC (differential scanning calorimetry), and TEM (transmission electron microscopy). The moisturizing effect of formulations was determined by and methods.

RESULTS

Findings of the assessments demonstrated that in products prepared with magnetized water, 5% SLN Precirol® had the most moisturizing effect and 5% SLN Compritol® had the most moisturizing effect . The use of magnetized water in formulations can improve the effectiveness and increase the stability of moisturizing products.

CONCLUSION

In this study, all products prepared with magnetized water showed more stability, smaller size, and more moisturizing effects compared with products prepared with deionized water.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用磁化水和去离子水来测定和比较不同固体脂质纳米粒(SLN)和纳米结构脂质载体(NLC)的保湿和封闭效果。

材料与方法

使用各种脂质(包括三棕榈精、Compritol®、Precirol®)以及乳化剂(包括泊洛沙姆和吐温80)制备SLN制剂。还用油酸和相同的固体脂质制备了NLC制剂。制备两种类型的制剂;首先用去离子水,然后用磁化水。使用高剪切均质化和超声方法制备制剂。通过PSA(粒度分析仪)、DSC(差示扫描量热法)和TEM(透射电子显微镜)对产品进行分析。通过[具体方法1]和[具体方法2]方法测定制剂的保湿效果。

结果

评估结果表明,在用磁化水制备的产品中,5%的Precirol® SLN具有最大的保湿效果[具体指标1],5%的Compritol® SLN具有最大的保湿效果[具体指标2]。在制剂中使用磁化水可以提高保湿产品的有效性并增加其稳定性。

结论

在本研究中,与用去离子水制备的产品相比,所有用磁化水制备的产品都表现出更高的稳定性、更小的粒径和更强的保湿效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/623e/7229509/cd1ecdf1d889/IJBMS-23-337-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验