Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):2881-2891. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05553-8.
The purpose of this observational study is to characterize the use of social media content pertaining to global surgery.
A search for public posts on social media related to global surgery was performed over a 3-month window, from January 1st, 2019, to March 31st, 2019. Two public domains were included in the search: Instagram and Twitter. Posts were selected by filtering for one hashtag: #GlobalSurgery. A binary scoring system was used for media format, perspective of the poster, timing of the post, tone, and post content. Data were analyzed using Chi-squared tests with significance set to p < 0.05.
Overall, 2633 posts with the hashtag #GlobalSurgery were publicly shared on these two social media platforms over the 3-month period. Of these, 2272 (86.3%) referenced content related to global surgery and were original posts. Physicians and other health professionals authored a majority (60.5%, 1083/1788) of posts on Twitter, whereas organizations comprised a majority of the posts on Instagram (59.9%, 290/484). Posts either had a positive (50.2%, 1140/2272) or neutral (49.6%, 1126/2272) tone, with only 0.3% or 6/2272 of posts being explicitly negative. The content of the posts varied, but most frequently (43.4%, 986/2272) focused on promoting communication and engagement within the community, followed by educational content (21.3%, 486/2272), advertisements (18.8%, 427/2272), and published research (13.2%, 299/2272). The majority of global surgery posts originated from the USA, UK, or Canada (67.6%, 1537/2272), followed by international organizations (11.5%, 261/2272). Chi-squared analysis comparing Instagram with Twitter performed examining media content, tone, perspective, and content, finding statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) the two platforms for each of the categories.
The online social media community with respect to global surgery engagement is predominantly composed of surgeons and health care professionals, focused primarily on promoting dialogue within the online community. Social media platforms may provide a scalable tool that can augment engagement between global surgeons, with remaining opportunity to foster global collaboration, community engagement, education and awareness.
本观察性研究的目的是描述与全球外科学相关的社交媒体内容的使用情况。
从 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 3 月 31 日,对社交媒体上与全球外科学相关的公共帖子进行了为期 3 个月的搜索。搜索包括两个公共领域:Instagram 和 Twitter。通过过滤一个标签#GlobalSurgery 选择帖子。使用二元评分系统评估媒体格式、发布者视角、帖子发布时间、语气和帖子内容。使用卡方检验进行数据分析,显著性水平设为 p<0.05。
在这 3 个月期间,这两个社交媒体平台上共有 2633 个带有#GlobalSurgery 标签的帖子被公开分享。其中,2272 个(86.3%)引用了与全球外科学相关的内容,并且是原创帖子。医生和其他卫生专业人员在 Twitter 上撰写了大多数(60.5%,1083/1788)帖子,而组织在 Instagram 上发布了大多数帖子(59.9%,290/484)。帖子的语气要么是积极的(50.2%,1140/2272),要么是中立的(49.6%,1126/2272),只有 0.3%或 6/2272 的帖子明确表示消极。帖子的内容各不相同,但最常见的(43.4%,986/2272)是在社区内促进交流和参与,其次是教育内容(21.3%,486/2272)、广告(18.8%,427/2272)和已发表的研究(13.2%,299/2272)。大多数全球外科学帖子来自美国、英国或加拿大(67.6%,1537/2272),其次是国际组织(11.5%,261/2272)。对 Instagram 与 Twitter 进行的卡方分析比较了媒体内容、语气、视角和内容,发现这两个平台在每个类别中都存在统计学上的显著差异(p<0.001)。
关于全球外科学参与的在线社交媒体社区主要由外科医生和医疗保健专业人员组成,主要侧重于促进在线社区内的对话。社交媒体平台可能提供一个可扩展的工具,可以增强全球外科医生之间的参与度,并为促进全球合作、社区参与、教育和意识提供更多机会。