• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CT脑部扫描中的肿瘤性和非肿瘤性急性脑出血:基于放射组学图像特征的机器学习预测

Neoplastic and Non-neoplastic Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage in CT Brain Scans: Machine Learning-Based Prediction Using Radiomic Image Features.

作者信息

Nawabi Jawed, Kniep Helge, Kabiri Reza, Broocks Gabriel, Faizy Tobias D, Thaler Christian, Schön Gerhard, Fiehler Jens, Hanning Uta

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2020 May 5;11:285. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00285. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2020.00285
PMID:32477233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7232581/
Abstract

Early differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) can be difficult in initial radiological evaluation, especially for extensive ICHs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of a machine learning-based prediction of etiology for acute ICHs based on quantitative radiomic image features extracted from initial non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) brain scans. The analysis included NECT brain scans from 77 patients with acute ICH ( = 50 non-neoplastic, = 27 neoplastic). Radiomic features including shape, histogram, and texture markers were extracted from non-, wavelet-, and log-sigma-filtered images using regions of interest of ICH and perihematomal edema (PHE). Six thousand and ninety quantitative predictors were evaluated utilizing random forest algorithms with five-fold model-external cross-validation. Model stability was assessed through comparative analysis of 10 randomly drawn cross-validation sets. Classifier performance was compared with predictions of two radiologists employing the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of the test sets for predicting neoplastic vs. non-neoplastic ICHs was 0.89 [95% CI (0.70; 0.99); < 0.001], and specificities and sensitivities reached >80%. Compared to the radiologists' predictions, the machine learning algorithm yielded equal or superior results for all evaluated metrics. The MCC of the proposed algorithm at its optimal operating point (0.69) was significantly higher than the MCC of the radiologist readers (0.54); = 0.01. Evaluating quantitative features of acute NECT images in a machine learning algorithm provided high discriminatory power in predicting non-neoplastic vs. neoplastic ICHs. Utilized in the clinical routine, the proposed approach could improve patient care at low risk and costs.

摘要

在初始影像学评估中,肿瘤性和非肿瘤性脑出血(ICH)的早期鉴别可能具有挑战性,尤其是对于广泛的脑出血。本研究的目的是基于从初始非增强计算机断层扫描(NECT)脑部扫描中提取的定量放射组学图像特征,评估基于机器学习预测急性脑出血病因的潜力。分析包括77例急性脑出血患者的NECT脑部扫描(n = 50例非肿瘤性,n = 27例肿瘤性)。使用脑出血和血肿周围水肿(PHE)的感兴趣区域,从非滤波、小波滤波和对数标准差滤波图像中提取包括形状、直方图和纹理标记在内的放射组学特征。利用随机森林算法和五重模型外部交叉验证评估了6090个定量预测因子。通过对10个随机抽取的交叉验证集进行比较分析来评估模型稳定性。使用马修斯相关系数(MCC)将分类器性能与两位放射科医生的预测结果进行比较。预测肿瘤性与非肿瘤性ICH的测试集的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为0.89 [95% CI(0.70;0.99);P < 0.001],特异性和敏感性均达到80%以上。与放射科医生的预测相比,机器学习算法在所有评估指标上均产生了相同或更好的结果。所提出算法在其最佳工作点的MCC(0.69)显著高于放射科医生读者的MCC(0.54);P = 0.01。在机器学习算法中评估急性NECT图像的定量特征,在预测非肿瘤性与肿瘤性ICH方面具有很高的鉴别力。在临床常规中使用所提出的方法,可以以低风险和低成本改善患者护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/696b/7232581/6ff0f143db88/fneur-11-00285-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/696b/7232581/6d6d89a3583c/fneur-11-00285-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/696b/7232581/9c4e6df4318f/fneur-11-00285-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/696b/7232581/6ff0f143db88/fneur-11-00285-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/696b/7232581/6d6d89a3583c/fneur-11-00285-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/696b/7232581/9c4e6df4318f/fneur-11-00285-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/696b/7232581/6ff0f143db88/fneur-11-00285-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Neoplastic and Non-neoplastic Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage in CT Brain Scans: Machine Learning-Based Prediction Using Radiomic Image Features.CT脑部扫描中的肿瘤性和非肿瘤性急性脑出血:基于放射组学图像特征的机器学习预测
Front Neurol. 2020 May 5;11:285. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00285. eCollection 2020.
2
Optimizing the radiomics-machine-learning model based on non-contrast enhanced CT for the simplified risk categorization of thymic epithelial tumors: A large cohort retrospective study.基于非增强CT优化放射组学-机器学习模型用于胸腺瘤简化风险分类:一项大型队列回顾性研究
Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:150-160. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Imaging-Based Outcome Prediction of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.基于影像学的急性脑出血预后预测。
Transl Stroke Res. 2021 Dec;12(6):958-967. doi: 10.1007/s12975-021-00891-8. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
4
An interpretable artificial intelligence model based on CT for prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter study.基于 CT 的可解释人工智能模型对脑出血预后的预测:一项多中心研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01352-y.
5
External validation of the diagnostic value of perihematomal edema characteristics in neoplastic and non-neoplastic intracerebral hemorrhage.对肿瘤性和非肿瘤性脑出血perihematomal 水肿特征的诊断价值进行外部验证。
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Jun;30(6):1686-1695. doi: 10.1111/ene.15760. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
6
Next-Generation Radiogenomics Sequencing for Prediction of EGFR and KRAS Mutation Status in NSCLC Patients Using Multimodal Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms.使用多模态成像和机器学习算法的下一代放射基因组学测序预测非小细胞肺癌患者的EGFR和KRAS突变状态
Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Aug;22(4):1132-1148. doi: 10.1007/s11307-020-01487-8.
7
A machine learning approach for predicting perihematomal edema expansion in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.一种用于预测脑出血患者血肿周围水肿扩大的机器学习方法。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Jun;33(6):4052-4062. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09311-3. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
8
Prediction of Early Perihematomal Edema Expansion Based on Noncontrast Computed Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.基于非对比 CT 放射组学和机器学习预测脑出血早期血肿周围水肿扩大。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e264-e270. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.066. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
9
Radiomics of Brain MRI: Utility in Prediction of Metastatic Tumor Type.脑 MRI 影像组学:预测转移性肿瘤类型的效用。
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):479-487. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180946. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
10
Machine Learning-Based Perihematomal Tissue Features to Predict Clinical Outcome after Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.基于机器学习的血肿周围组织特征预测自发性脑出血患者的临床转归。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jun;31(6):106475. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106475. Epub 2022 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
An Explainable AI Exploration of the Machine Learning Classification of Neoplastic Intracerebral Hemorrhage from Non-Contrast CT.基于非增强CT的脑内肿瘤性出血机器学习分类的可解释人工智能探索
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;17(15):2502. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152502.
2
Evolution of Perihematomal Edema Mean Hounsfield Unit and Its Association with Clinical Outcome in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Post Hoc Analysis of the i-DEF Trial.脑出血周围血肿水肿平均亨氏单位的演变及其与临床结局的关联:i-DEF试验的事后分析
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02337-7.
3
Improving differentiation of hemorrhagic brain metastases from non-neoplastic hematomas using radiomics and clinical feature fusion.

本文引用的文献

1
The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.马修斯相关系数(MCC)在二分类评估中优于 F1 得分和准确率的优势。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
2
Advanced machine learning in action: identification of intracranial hemorrhage on computed tomography scans of the head with clinical workflow integration.实用的高级机器学习:通过整合临床工作流程,在头部计算机断层扫描中识别颅内出血。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Apr 4;1:9. doi: 10.1038/s41746-017-0015-z. eCollection 2018.
3
Radiomics of Brain MRI: Utility in Prediction of Metastatic Tumor Type.
利用影像组学和临床特征融合提高出血性脑转移瘤与非肿瘤性血肿的鉴别诊断能力。
Neuroradiology. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03590-5.
4
Machine learning based classification of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhages using radiomics features.基于放射组学特征的自发性颅内出血的机器学习分类
Neuroradiology. 2025 Feb;67(2):339-349. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03481-1. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
5
Clinical and imaging manifestations of intracerebral hemorrhage in brain tumors and metastatic lesions: a comprehensive overview.脑肿瘤和转移瘤中脑出血的临床与影像学表现:全面概述
J Neurooncol. 2024 Dec;170(3):567-578. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04811-2. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
6
Building nonenhanced CT based radiomics model in discriminating arteriovenous malformation related hematomas from hypertensive intracerebral hematomas.构建基于非增强CT的影像组学模型以鉴别动静脉畸形相关血肿与高血压性脑出血。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Nov 28;17:1284560. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1284560. eCollection 2023.
7
Machine learning-based CT radiomics model to discriminate the primary and secondary intracranial hemorrhage.基于机器学习的 CT 放射组学模型鉴别原发性和继发性颅内出血。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 6;13(1):3709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30678-w.
8
A CT-based radiomics nomogram for classification of intraparenchymal hyperdense areas in patients with acute ischemic stroke following mechanical thrombectomy treatment.基于CT的影像组学列线图用于机械取栓治疗后急性缺血性脑卒中患者脑实质内高密度区域的分类
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 10;16:1061745. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1061745. eCollection 2022.
9
Models of ultrasonic radiomics and clinical characters for lymph node metastasis assessment in thyroid cancer: a retrospective study.甲状腺癌超声影像组学模型与临床特征评估淋巴结转移的回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 12;11:e14546. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14546. eCollection 2023.
10
Radiomics Features on Computed Tomography Combined With Clinical-Radiological Factors Predicting Progressive Hemorrhage of Cerebral Contusion.基于计算机断层扫描的影像组学特征联合临床放射学因素预测脑挫裂伤进行性出血
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 14;13:839784. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.839784. eCollection 2022.
脑 MRI 影像组学:预测转移性肿瘤类型的效用。
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):479-487. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180946. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
4
Diagnosing Neoplastic Hematoma: Role of MR Perfusion.诊断肿瘤性血肿:磁共振灌注成像的作用。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Jun;29(2):263-268. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0664-6. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
5
Ten quick tips for machine learning in computational biology.计算生物学中机器学习的十条快速提示。
BioData Min. 2017 Dec 8;10:35. doi: 10.1186/s13040-017-0155-3. eCollection 2017.
6
Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.用于解码影像学表型的计算放射组学系统
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339.
7
Radiomics in Brain Tumor: Image Assessment, Quantitative Feature Descriptors, and Machine-Learning Approaches.脑肿瘤的放射组学:图像评估、定量特征描述符和机器学习方法。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):208-216. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5391. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine.放射组学:医学影像与个性化医疗之间的桥梁。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
9
Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric.使用马修斯相关系数度量的不平衡数据最优分类器。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0177678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177678. eCollection 2017.
10
Glioblastoma presenting as spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage: Case report and review of the literature.以自发性颅内出血为表现的胶质母细胞瘤:病例报告及文献复习
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Jun;40:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.12.046. Epub 2017 Feb 15.