• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于无人机拍摄的图像和正射镶嵌图对棉花、高粱和甘蔗试验地的地面覆盖估计进行比较。

Comparison of ground cover estimates from experiment plots in cotton, sorghum and sugarcane based on images and ortho-mosaics captured by UAV.

作者信息

Duan Tao, Zheng Bangyou, Guo Wei, Ninomiya Seishi, Guo Yan, Chapman Scott C

机构信息

CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.

Institute for Sustainable Agro-ecosystem Services, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 188-0002, Japan.

出版信息

Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Feb;44(1):169-183. doi: 10.1071/FP16123.

DOI:10.1071/FP16123
PMID:32480555
Abstract

Ground cover is an important physiological trait affecting crop radiation capture, water-use efficiency and grain yield. It is challenging to efficiently measure ground cover with reasonable precision for large numbers of plots, especially in tall crop species. Here we combined two image-based methods to estimate plot-level ground cover for three species, from either an ortho-mosaic or undistorted (i.e. corrected for lens and camera effects) images captured by cameras using a low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Reconstructed point clouds and ortho-mosaics for the whole field were created and a customised image processing workflow was developed to (1) segment the 'whole-field' datasets into individual plots, and (2) 'reverse-calculate' each plot from each undistorted image. Ground cover for individual plots was calculated by an efficient vegetation segmentation algorithm. For 79% of plots, estimated ground cover was greater from the ortho-mosaic than from images, particularly when plants were small, or when older/taller in large plots. While there was a good agreement between the ground cover estimates from ortho-mosaic and images when the target plot was positioned at a near-nadir view near the centre of image (cotton: R2=0.97, sorghum: R2=0.98, sugarcane: R2=0.84), ortho-mosaic estimates were 5% greater than estimates from these near-nadir images. Because each plot appeared in multiple images, there were multiple estimates of the ground cover, some of which should be excluded, e.g. when the plot is near edge within an image. Considering only the images with near-nadir view, the reverse calculation provides a more precise estimate of ground cover compared with the ortho-mosaic. The methodology is suitable for high throughput phenotyping for applications in agronomy, physiology and breeding for different crop species and can be extended to provide pixel-level data from other types of cameras including thermal and multi-spectral models.

摘要

地面覆盖是影响作物辐射捕获、水分利用效率和谷物产量的重要生理特性。对于大量地块,尤其是高大作物品种,要以合理的精度高效测量地面覆盖具有挑战性。在这里,我们结合了两种基于图像的方法,从使用低空无人机(UAV)拍摄的正射镶嵌图或未失真(即校正了镜头和相机效果)的图像中估计三种作物品种的地块级地面覆盖。创建了整个田地的重建点云正射镶嵌图,并开发了定制的图像处理工作流程,以(1)将“全场”数据集分割为单个地块,以及(2)从每个未失真图像“反向计算”每个地块。通过高效的植被分割算法计算单个地块的地面覆盖。对于79%的地块,正射镶嵌图估计的地面覆盖大于图像估计值,特别是当植物较小时,或在大地块中植物较老/较高时。当目标地块位于图像中心附近的近天底视图时,正射镶嵌图和图像的地面覆盖估计之间有很好的一致性(棉花:R2 = 0.97,高粱:R2 = 0.98,甘蔗:R2 = 0.84),但正射镶嵌图估计值比这些近天底图像的估计值大5%。由于每个地块出现在多个图像中,因此有多个地面覆盖估计值,其中一些应该排除,例如当地块靠近图像边缘时。仅考虑近天底视图的图像,与正射镶嵌图相比,反向计算提供了更精确的地面覆盖估计。该方法适用于不同作物品种在农学、生理学和育种中的高通量表型分析,并且可以扩展以提供来自包括热成像和多光谱模型在内的其他类型相机的像素级数据。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ground cover estimates from experiment plots in cotton, sorghum and sugarcane based on images and ortho-mosaics captured by UAV.基于无人机拍摄的图像和正射镶嵌图对棉花、高粱和甘蔗试验地的地面覆盖估计进行比较。
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Feb;44(1):169-183. doi: 10.1071/FP16123.
2
Multi-Spectral Imaging from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Enables the Assessment of Seasonal Leaf Area Dynamics of Sorghum Breeding Lines.基于无人机的多光谱成像技术可用于评估高粱育种系的季节性叶面积动态变化。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Sep 8;8:1532. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01532. eCollection 2017.
3
Detecting Sorghum Plant and Head Features from Multispectral UAV Imagery.从多光谱无人机图像中检测高粱植株和穗部特征。
Plant Phenomics. 2021 Oct 1;2021:9874650. doi: 10.34133/2021/9874650. eCollection 2021.
4
Aerial Imagery Analysis - Quantifying Appearance and Number of Sorghum Heads for Applications in Breeding and Agronomy.航空图像分析——量化高粱穗头的外观和数量以用于育种和农学应用
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Oct 23;9:1544. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01544. eCollection 2018.
5
High-Throughput Phenotyping of Bioethanol Potential in Cereals Using UAV-Based Multi-Spectral Imagery.利用无人机多光谱影像对谷物生物乙醇潜力进行高通量表型分析。
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jul 23;10:948. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00948. eCollection 2019.
6
Multispectral imaging and unmanned aerial systems for cotton plant phenotyping.多光谱成像和无人机系统在棉花表型分析中的应用。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0205083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205083. eCollection 2019.
7
Improved Accuracy of High-Throughput Phenotyping From Unmanned Aerial Systems by Extracting Traits Directly From Orthorectified Images.通过直接从正射校正图像中提取特征提高无人机系统高通量表型分析的准确性。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Oct 21;11:587093. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.587093. eCollection 2020.
8
Assessment of Multi-Image Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Canopy Temperature.基于多图像无人机的冠层温度高通量田间表型评估
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Feb 25;11:150. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00150. eCollection 2020.
9
Estimation of maize plant height and leaf area index dynamics using an unmanned aerial vehicle with oblique and nadir photography.利用具有倾斜和正摄影像的无人机估算玉米植株高度和叶面积指数动态。
Ann Bot. 2020 Sep 14;126(4):765-773. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa097.
10
High Throughput Field Phenotyping for Plant Height Using UAV-Based RGB Imagery in Wheat Breeding Lines: Feasibility and Validation.基于无人机RGB图像的小麦育种系株高高通量田间表型分析:可行性与验证
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 16;12:591587. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.591587. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the accuracy of cotton seedling emergence rate estimation by fusing UAV-based multispectral vegetation indices.通过融合基于无人机的多光谱植被指数提高棉花出苗率估计的准确性。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Mar 27;15:1333089. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1333089. eCollection 2024.
2
Utilizing Spectral, Structural and Textural Features for Estimating Oat Above-Ground Biomass Using UAV-Based Multispectral Data and Machine Learning.利用基于无人机的多光谱数据和机器学习的光谱、结构和纹理特征估算燕麦地上生物量。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;23(24):9708. doi: 10.3390/s23249708.
3
Drone-Based Harvest Data Prediction Can Reduce On-Farm Food Loss and Improve Farmer Income.
基于无人机的收获数据预测可以减少农场食品损失并提高农民收入。
Plant Phenomics. 2023 Sep 7;5:0086. doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0086. eCollection 2023.
4
High-throughput field crop phenotyping: current status and challenges.高通量田间作物表型分析:现状与挑战
Breed Sci. 2022 Mar;72(1):3-18. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.21069. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
Evaluation of macadamia felted coccid (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) damage and cultivar susceptibility using imagery from a small unmanned aerial vehicle (sUAV), combined with ground truthing.利用小型无人机 (sUAV) 获取的图像以及地面实况调查评估澳洲坚果毡蚧 (半翅目:粉蚧科) 的损害和品种易感性。
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Nov;78(11):4533-4543. doi: 10.1002/ps.7073. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
Integrating a crop growth model and radiative transfer model to improve estimation of crop traits based on deep learning.基于深度学习的作物生长模型与辐射传输模型集成以提高作物特性估算。
J Exp Bot. 2022 Nov 2;73(19):6558-6574. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac291.
7
Automatic Microplot Localization Using UAV Images and a Hierarchical Image-Based Optimization Method.使用无人机图像和基于分层图像的优化方法进行自动微区定位
Plant Phenomics. 2021 Dec 8;2021:9764514. doi: 10.34133/2021/9764514. eCollection 2021.
8
Detecting Sorghum Plant and Head Features from Multispectral UAV Imagery.从多光谱无人机图像中检测高粱植株和穗部特征。
Plant Phenomics. 2021 Oct 1;2021:9874650. doi: 10.34133/2021/9874650. eCollection 2021.
9
Large-scale field phenotyping using backpack LiDAR and CropQuant-3D to measure structural variation in wheat.利用背包式 LiDAR 和 CropQuant-3D 进行大规模田间表型分析,测量小麦结构变异。
Plant Physiol. 2021 Oct 5;187(2):716-738. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab324.
10
Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR.不同光照和露水对基于主动式归一化植被指数(NDVI)、RGB和激光雷达的地面覆盖估计的影响
Plant Phenomics. 2021 May 27;2021:9842178. doi: 10.34133/2021/9842178. eCollection 2021.