Shen Jiying, Hua Zhixiang, Zhang Limei, Zhuo Baoxian, Shen Wenqian, Chen Xuanzhu, Guo Haike, Yang Jin
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Heping Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Department of Ophthalmology and the Eye Institute, Eye and Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 4;10:1237319. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1237319. eCollection 2023.
Astigmatism reduces the postoperative visual performance after non-toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) implantation, and limits the use of refractive IOLs in cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy in astigmatism correction and the postoperative visual outcomes between the implantation of a trifocal IOL with femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) in one eye and a bifocal toric IOL (TIOL) in the other, in patients with cataract and moderate astigmatism.
This prospective observational paired-eye study enrolled patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism (CA) between 0.75 and 2.25 D in both eyes. The patients underwent a mix-and-match treatment comprising trifocal IOL implantation with FSAK and bifocal TIOL implantation. We compared the visual acuity (VA) at all distances, defocus curve, postoperative refractive astigmatism (RfA), CA, high-order aberrations, modulation transfer function (MTF) curve, and Strehl ratio between the two eye groups.
In total, 41 patients (82 eyes) were enrolled and completed a 6-month follow-up. The 1- and 3-month uncorrected distance VA and 3-month uncorrected near VA were greater in eyes with bifocal TIOLs than with trifocal IOLs and FSAK ( = 0.036, 0.010, and 0.030, respectively), whereas the latter had greater uncorrected intermediate VA at every visit and greater VA in the intermediate range of defocus curve (at -1.50 and - 2.00 D) than the eyes with bifocal TIOLs. The postoperative RA of the eyes with trifocal IOL and FSAK was significantly higher than that of the bifocal TIOL-implanted eyes at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups.
Both FSAK and TIOL implantation effectively reduce pre-existing moderate astigmatism in patients with cataract. The eyes with bifocal TIOLs had more stable long-term astigmatism correction, whereas those with trifocal IOLs and FSAK had better intermediate VA. Therefore, a mix-and-match implantation of trifocal IOL with FSAK and contralateral bifocal TIOL could achieve effective astigmatism correction and provide an overall optimal VA.
散光会降低非散光型人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后的视觉效果,并限制屈光性IOL在白内障手术中的应用。本研究的目的是比较在患有白内障和中度散光的患者中,一只眼植入三焦点IOL并联合飞秒激光辅助弧形角膜切开术(FSAK),另一只眼植入双焦点散光型IOL(TIOL)的散光矫正效果和术后视觉结果。
这项前瞻性观察性双眼配对研究纳入了双眼角膜散光(CA)在0.75至2.25 D之间的白内障患者。患者接受了包括三焦点IOL植入联合FSAK和双焦点TIOL植入的混合治疗。我们比较了两组眼在所有距离的视力(VA)、散焦曲线、术后屈光性散光(RfA)、CA、高阶像差、调制传递函数(MTF)曲线和斯特列尔比。
总共41例患者(82只眼)入组并完成了6个月的随访。双焦点TIOL组眼的1个月和3个月未矫正远视力以及3个月未矫正近视力均高于三焦点IOL联合FSAK组眼(分别为P = 0.036、0.010和0.030),而后者在每次随访时的未矫正中间视力以及在散焦曲线中间范围(-1.50和-2.00 D)的视力均高于双焦点TIOL组眼。在3个月和6个月随访时,三焦点IOL联合FSAK组眼的术后RfA显著高于植入双焦点TIOL组眼。
FSAK和TIOL植入均能有效降低白内障患者术前存在的中度散光。双焦点TIOL组眼的长期散光矫正更稳定,而三焦点IOL联合FSAK组眼的中间视力更好。因此,三焦点IOL联合FSAK与对侧双焦点TIOL的混合植入可实现有效的散光矫正并提供总体最佳的视力。