Wander K, Shell-Duncan B
Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, New York, 13902, USA.
Department of Anthropology, Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2020 May 12;11:100593. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100593. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Female genital cutting (FGC), which poses risks to the health of girls, has proved remarkably persistent in many communities in Africa, despite decades of efforts to discourage it. The social coordination norm model of FGC attributes this persistence to high social costs for uncut women, such as exclusion from marriage markets or social support networks.
OBJECTIVE/METHODS: To test the social coordination model of FGC decision-making in Senegambia, we examined variation in FGC across communities, attitudes toward FGC, and how attitudes affected readiness to change (abandon) FGC. We used an ethnographically-grounded survey to assess valuation of FGC and readiness to change FGC. We used factor analysis to identify constructs in valuation of FGC and logistic regression models to evaluate hypothesized predictors of cut status and readiness to change FGC drawn from the social coordination norm model.
1220 women with at least one daughter completed the survey; FGC valuation and readiness to change were characterized in 820 of these women. Findings were generally consistent with the social coordination norm hypothesis: Both locality and ethnicity were associated with cut status, and the prevalence of cutting across communities clustered at high and low levels. Factor analysis identified two distinct concerns in valuation of FGC-social advantages and health costs-and these were distributed differently for cut and uncut women, reflecting distinct normative schema. Further, readiness to change FGC differed in predicted ways with valuation of FGC.
These findings support the social coordination norm model, and reveal distinct normative schema among cut and uncut women. Furthermore, our findings point to a dynamic reassessment of social benefits and health costs underlying FGC decision-making and readiness to change FGC. The reappraisal of social benefits may be an unrecognized opportunity for programs aiming to discourage FGC.
女性生殖器切割对女孩的健康构成风险,尽管数十年来一直在努力劝阻,但在非洲的许多社区中,这种行为依然显著存在。女性生殖器切割的社会协调规范模型将这种持久性归因于未切割女性面临的高昂社会成本,例如被婚姻市场或社会支持网络排斥。
目的/方法:为了检验塞内冈比亚女性生殖器切割决策的社会协调模型,我们研究了不同社区之间女性生殖器切割的差异、对女性生殖器切割的态度,以及态度如何影响改变(放弃)女性生殖器切割的意愿。我们采用基于人种志的调查来评估对女性生殖器切割的重视程度以及改变女性生殖器切割的意愿。我们使用因子分析来确定女性生殖器切割重视程度中的结构,并使用逻辑回归模型来评估从社会协调规范模型中得出的切割状态和改变女性生殖器切割意愿的假设预测因素。
1220名至少有一个女儿的女性完成了调查;其中820名女性的女性生殖器切割重视程度和改变意愿得到了描述。研究结果总体上与社会协调规范假设一致:地区和种族都与切割状态相关,并且不同社区的切割流行程度集中在高和低两个水平。因子分析确定了女性生殖器切割重视程度中的两个不同关注点——社会优势和健康成本——并且切割和未切割女性对这些关注点的分布不同,反映了不同的规范模式。此外,改变女性生殖器切割的意愿因对女性生殖器切割的重视程度而以预测的方式有所不同。
这些发现支持社会协调规范模型,并揭示了切割和未切割女性之间不同的规范模式。此外,我们的发现指出了对女性生殖器切割决策和改变女性生殖器切割意愿背后的社会利益和健康成本进行动态重新评估。对社会利益的重新评估可能是旨在劝阻女性生殖器切割的项目中一个未被认识到的机会。