Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Jun 3;12(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00632-3.
Although numerous electroencephalogram (EEG) studies have described differences in functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to healthy subjects, there is no general consensus on the methodology of estimating functional connectivity in AD. Inconsistent results are reported due to multiple methodological factors such as diagnostic criteria, small sample sizes and the use of functional connectivity measures sensitive to volume conduction. We aimed to investigate the reproducibility of the disease-associated effects described by commonly used functional connectivity measures with respect to the amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (A/T/N) criteria.
Eyes-closed task-free 21-channel EEG was used from patients with probable AD and subjective cognitive decline (SCD), to form two cohorts. Artefact-free epochs were visually selected and several functional connectivity measures (AEC(-c), coherence, imaginary coherence, PLV, PLI, wPLI) were estimated in five frequency bands. Functional connectivity was compared between diagnoses using AN(C)OVA models correcting for sex, age and, additionally, relative power of the frequency band. Another model predicted the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of AD patients by functional connectivity estimates. The analysis was repeated in a subpopulation fulfilling the A/T/N criteria, after correction for influencing factors. The analyses were repeated in the second cohort.
Two large cohorts were formed (SCD/AD; n = 197/214 and n = 202/196). Reproducible effects were found for the AEC-c in the alpha and beta frequency bands (p = 6.20 × 10, Cohen's d = - 0.53; p = 5.78 × 10, d = - 0.37) and PLI and wPLI in the theta band (p = 3.81 × 10, d = 0.59; p = 1.62 × 10, d = 0.60, respectively). Only effects of the AEC-c remained significant after statistical correction for the relative power of the selected bandwidth. In addition, alpha band AEC-c correlated with disease severity represented by MMSE score.
The choice of functional connectivity measure and frequency band can have a large impact on the outcome of EEG studies in AD. Our results indicate that in the alpha and beta frequency bands, the effects measured by the AEC-c are reproducible and the most valid in terms of influencing factors, correlation with disease severity and preferable properties such as correction for volume conduction. Phase-based measures with correction for volume conduction, such as the PLI, showed reproducible effects in the theta frequency band.
尽管许多脑电图(EEG)研究描述了阿尔茨海默病(AD)与健康受试者之间功能连接的差异,但在估计 AD 中的功能连接的方法学上尚无共识。由于多种方法学因素,如诊断标准、样本量小以及使用对容积传导敏感的功能连接测量,因此报告的结果不一致。我们旨在根据淀粉样蛋白、tau 和神经退行性变(A/T/N)标准,研究常用功能连接测量描述的疾病相关效应的可重复性。
使用闭眼、无任务的 21 通道 EEG 从可能患有 AD 和主观认知下降(SCD)的患者中采集数据,形成两个队列。通过视觉选择无伪迹的时段,并在五个频带中估计几种功能连接测量(AEC(-c)、相干性、虚相干性、PLV、PLI、wPLI)。使用 AN(C)OVA 模型比较诊断之间的功能连接,该模型校正了性别、年龄,另外还校正了频带的相对功率。另一个模型通过功能连接估计预测 AD 患者的 Mini-Mental State Exam(MMSE)评分。在亚组中重复分析,该亚组满足 A/T/N 标准,并校正了影响因素。在第二个队列中重复了该分析。
形成了两个大型队列(SCD/AD;n=197/214 和 n=202/196)。在 alpha 和 beta 频带中发现了可重复的 AEC-c 效应(p=6.20×10,Cohen's d=−0.53;p=5.78×10,d=−0.37),在 theta 频带中发现了 PLI 和 wPLI 的可重复效应(p=3.81×10,d=0.59;p=1.62×10,d=0.60)。在对所选带宽的相对功率进行统计校正后,只有 AEC-c 的效应仍然显著。此外,alpha 频带 AEC-c 与 MMSE 评分代表的疾病严重程度相关。
功能连接测量和频带的选择会对 AD 中 EEG 研究的结果产生重大影响。我们的结果表明,在 alpha 和 beta 频带中,AEC-c 测量的效应具有可重复性,并且在影响因素、与疾病严重程度的相关性以及容积传导校正等方面具有更好的有效性。在 theta 频带中,具有容积传导校正的基于相位的测量(如 PLI)显示出可重复的效应。