Macek Pawel, Biskup Malgorzata, Terek-Derszniak Malgorzata, Stachura Michal, Krol Halina, Gozdz Stanislaw, Zak Marek
Department of Physical Activity, Posturology, and Gerontology, Institute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, The Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, Holycross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 May 12;13:1587-1597. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S248444. eCollection 2020.
Reliable obesity assessment is essential in evaluating the risk of cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs). Non-availability of clearly defined cut-offs for body fat percentage (BF%), as well as a widespread application of surrogate measures for obesity assessment, may result in incorrect prediction of cardio-metabolic risk.
The study aimed to determine optimal cut-off points for BF%, with a view of predicting the CRFs related to obesity.
The study involved 4735 (33.6% of men) individuals, the Polish-Norwegian Study (PONS) participants, aged 45-64. BF% was measured with the aid of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method. The gender-specific cut-offs of BF% were found with respect to at least one CRF. A -value approach, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were pursued for BF% cut-offs, which optimally differentiated normal from the risk groups. The associations between BF% and CRFs were determined by logistic regression models.
The cut-offs for BF% were established as 25.8% for men and 37.1% for women. With the exception of dyslipidemia, in men and women whose BF% was above the cut-offs, the odds for developing CRFs ranged 2-4 times higher than those whose BF% was below the cut-offs.
Controlling BF% below the thresholds indicating an increased health hazard may be instrumental in appreciably reducing overall exposure to developing cardio-metabolic risk.
可靠的肥胖评估对于评估心血管危险因素(CRF)的风险至关重要。缺乏明确界定的体脂百分比(BF%)临界值,以及肥胖评估替代指标的广泛应用,可能导致对心血管代谢风险的预测错误。
本研究旨在确定BF%的最佳临界值,以预测与肥胖相关的CRF。
该研究纳入了4735名(33.6%为男性)年龄在45 - 64岁的波兰 - 挪威研究(PONS)参与者。借助生物电阻抗分析(BIA)方法测量BF%。针对至少一种CRF,确定了特定性别的BF%临界值。采用A值法和受试者工作特征曲线分析来确定BF%临界值,该临界值能最佳地区分正常组与风险组。通过逻辑回归模型确定BF%与CRF之间的关联。
确定男性BF%的临界值为25.8%,女性为37.1%。除血脂异常外,BF%高于临界值的男性和女性发生CRF的几率比BF%低于临界值的人高2 - 4倍。
将BF%控制在表明健康危害增加的阈值以下,可能有助于显著降低发生心血管代谢风险的总体暴露水平。