Chaichan Soramon, Asawalertsaeng Thatchanon, Veerapongtongchai Pat, Chattakul Paiboon, Khamsai Sittichai, Pongkulkiat Patnarin, Chotmongkol Verajit, Limpawattana Panita, Chindaprasirt Jarin, Senthong Vichai, Ngamjarus Chetta, Sittichanbuncha Yuwares, Kitkhuandee Amnat, Sawanyawisuth Kittisak
Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 13;19:101118. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101118. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Motorcycles are the most common type of vehicle involved in traffic deaths in developing countries. Although helmets can provide protection against injury, there is limited evidence available regarding which type of helmet best protects against head and neck injuries in this setting. This review was conducted based on articles in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We compared full-face helmets with other types of helmet with regard to head and neck injury prevention in road accidents involving motorcyclists. Of 702 studies, six were eligible with a total of 6,529 participants. When compared with partial and open helmets, the odds ratio of full-face helmets was 0.356 (95% CI of 0.280, 0.453) and 0.636 (95% CI of 0.453, 0.894), respectively, for reduction of head and neck injuries. In conclusion, full-face helmets reduced head and neck injuries in motorcycle accidents to a greater extent than other types of helmet. Policy makers should recommend that motorcyclists use full-face helmets.
在发展中国家,摩托车是交通事故死亡中最常见的涉事车辆类型。尽管头盔能够提供防伤害保护,但在这种情况下,关于哪种类型的头盔最能预防头部和颈部受伤的证据有限。本综述基于PubMed、Scopus和科学网数据库中的文章进行。我们比较了全脸头盔与其他类型头盔在涉及骑摩托车者的道路事故中预防头部和颈部受伤方面的效果。在702项研究中,有6项符合条件,共有6529名参与者。与半盔和开面盔相比,全脸头盔减少头部和颈部受伤的优势比分别为0.356(95%置信区间为0.280, 0.453)和0.636(95%置信区间为0.453, 0.894)。总之,全脸头盔在摩托车事故中比其他类型的头盔能更大程度地减少头部和颈部受伤。政策制定者应建议骑摩托车者使用全脸头盔。