• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息应激源与癌症患者的生活质量:因术前术后阶段不一致对异常信息应激源的反应

Information-Stressors and Cancer Patients' Quality of Life: Responses to Deviant Information-Stressors Due to Pre-Postoperative Stage Discordance.

作者信息

Lee Seung Soo, Chung Ho Young, Kwon Oh Kyoung

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Chonnam Med J. 2020 May;56(2):108-114. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.2.108. Epub 2020 May 25.

DOI:10.4068/cmj.2020.56.2.108
PMID:32509557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7250667/
Abstract

This study assessed preoperative quality of life (QoL) of gastric cancer patients exposed to inconsistent illness information by pre-post-operative stage discordance. The impact of information-stressors on patients' QoL was investigated to determine information processing as a potential target for QoL management. Early-stage gastric cancer (EsGC) and late-stage gastric cancer (LsGC) groups based on their final stage were categorized by the consistency of preoperative staging information that was being shared. Those with consistent preoperative staging information were rated as EsGC (n=1,420) and LsGC (n=153) controls. EsGC and LsGC patients with misdirected information about their LsGC and EsGC were categorized as EsGC/iLsGC (n=32) and LsGC/iEsGC (n=55), respectively. Preoperative QoL data was obtained using EORTC QLQ-C30 and -STO22. QoL outcomes of EsGC/iLsGC and LsGC/iEsGC were compared with those of the EsGC and LsGC controls. QoL outcomes of the EsGC/iLsGC group matched that of EsGC control, but were significantly better than those of LsGC control on multiple scales including global health status/QoL, physical/role/social-functioning, and ten symptom scales/items. On the other hand, QoL outcomes of LsGC/iEsGC group were significantly better than those of LsGC control on multiple scales (global health status/QoL, physical/role-functioning, and nine symptom scales/items) while they roughly matched with those of EsGC control. Intensified information-stressors did not exacerbate QoL beyond the influence of the patients' medical condition, while de-intensified information-stressor improved QoL. Fear of negatively impacting QoL should not prevent the sharing of stressful illness information. As the de-intensified information-stressor improves QoL, information processing is recommended as a potential target for QoL management in cancer patients.

摘要

本研究通过术前术后分期不一致评估了接触不一致疾病信息的胃癌患者的术前生活质量(QoL)。研究了信息压力源对患者生活质量的影响,以确定信息处理作为生活质量管理的潜在目标。根据最终分期,将早期胃癌(EsGC)和晚期胃癌(LsGC)组按照术前分期信息的一致性进行分类。术前分期信息一致的患者被评为EsGC(n = 1420)和LsGC(n = 153)对照组。关于其LsGC和EsGC信息误导的EsGC和LsGC患者分别归类为EsGC/iLsGC(n = 32)和LsGC/iEsGC(n = 55)。术前生活质量数据使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ - C30和 - STO22获得。将EsGC/iLsGC和LsGC/iEsGC的生活质量结果与EsGC和LsGC对照组的结果进行比较。EsGC/iLsGC组的生活质量结果与EsGC对照组匹配,但在包括总体健康状况/生活质量、身体/角色/社会功能以及十个症状量表/项目在内的多个量表上显著优于LsGC对照组。另一方面,LsGC/iEsGC组的生活质量结果在多个量表(总体健康状况/生活质量、身体/角色功能以及九个症状量表/项目)上显著优于LsGC对照组,而它们大致与EsGC对照组匹配。强化的信息压力源在患者病情影响之外并未加剧生活质量,而弱化的信息压力源改善了生活质量。担心对生活质量产生负面影响不应阻止分享压力性疾病信息。由于弱化的信息压力源改善了生活质量,建议将信息处理作为癌症患者生活质量管理的潜在目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95a/7250667/8ed0627b20bf/cmj-56-108-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95a/7250667/2cd67737ca1e/cmj-56-108-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95a/7250667/8ed0627b20bf/cmj-56-108-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95a/7250667/2cd67737ca1e/cmj-56-108-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95a/7250667/8ed0627b20bf/cmj-56-108-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Information-Stressors and Cancer Patients' Quality of Life: Responses to Deviant Information-Stressors Due to Pre-Postoperative Stage Discordance.信息应激源与癌症患者的生活质量:因术前术后阶段不一致对异常信息应激源的反应
Chonnam Med J. 2020 May;56(2):108-114. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.2.108. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
Quality of life in cancer survivors 5 years or more after total gastrectomy: a case-control study.癌症幸存者全胃切除术后 5 年或以上的生活质量:病例对照研究。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(7):700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.067. Epub 2014 May 24.
3
The relationship between global and specific components of quality of life, assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a sample of 2019 cancer patients.在2019例癌症患者样本中,使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)评估的生活质量总体与特定组成部分之间的关系。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Mar;26(2). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12416. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
4
Cross-Sectional Patient-Reported Outcome Measuring of Health-Related Quality of Life With Establishment of Cancer- and Treatment-Specific Functional and Symptom Scales in Patients With Penile Cancer.阴茎癌患者的癌症和治疗特异性功能及症状量表建立的健康相关生活质量的横断面患者报告结局测量。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Dec;16(6):e1215-e1220. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.029. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
5
Symptoms and quality of life in chronic pancreatitis assessed by structured interview and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26.通过结构化访谈以及欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(QLQ-C30)和慢性胰腺炎问卷(QLQ-PAN26)评估慢性胰腺炎的症状和生活质量。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr;100(4):918-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40859.x.
6
Chronological Changes of Quality of Life in Long-Term Survivors after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.胃癌胃切除术后长期存活者生活质量的时间变化
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;48(3):1030-6. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.398. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
7
Quality of life following laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术后的生活质量
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Oct;59(119):2207-12. doi: 10.5754/hge11830.
8
Biological significance of localized Type IV scirrhous gastric cancer.局限性IV型硬化性胃癌的生物学意义
Oncol Lett. 2012 Jan;3(1):94-99. doi: 10.3892/ol.2011.454. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
9
[Factors affecting quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal cancer].[影响胃肠道癌症患者生活质量的因素]
Ai Zheng. 2007 Oct;26(10):1116-21.
10
Health-related Quality of Life in the Phase III LUME-Colon 1 Study: Comparison and Interpretation of Results From EORTC QLQ-C30 Analyses.LUME-Colon 1 研究 III 期的健康相关生活质量:EORTC QLQ-C30 分析结果的比较与解释。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Dec;18(4):269-279.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life of Young Gastric Cancer Survivors: An Interpretation in the Context of Our Society.青年胃癌幸存者的生活质量:基于我们社会背景的解读
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 20;60(1):9. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010009.
2
Impact on quality of life with affirmative feedback on weight loss after gastrectomy.胃切除术后体重减轻的肯定反馈对生活质量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 18;13(1):15454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42695-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term Quality of Life After Distal Subtotal and Total Gastrectomy: Symptom- and Behavior-oriented Consequences.远端胃次全切除术和全胃切除术后的长期生活质量:以症状和行为为导向的后果
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):738-44. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001481.
2
Disclosure of Cancer Information in Iran: a Perspective of Patients, Family Members, and Health Professionals.伊朗癌症信息的披露:患者、家庭成员及医疗专业人员的视角
Iran J Cancer Prev. 2011 Summer;4(3):130-4.
3
Responding to family requests for nondisclosure: the impact of oncologists' cultural background.
回应家属对保密的要求:肿瘤学家文化背景的影响
J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):174-80. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.140836.
4
Breaking bad news in cancer patients.向癌症患者传达坏消息。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2015 Jan-Apr;21(1):35-8. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.150172.
5
Association between Perception of Prognosis and Spiritual Well-being among Cancer Patients.癌症患者对预后的认知与精神健康之间的关联。
J Caring Sci. 2014 Feb 27;3(1):47-55. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2014.006. eCollection 2014 Mar.
6
Long-term Shifting Patterns in Quality of Life After Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy: Preoperative- and Healthy-based Interpretations.远端胃大部切除术后生活质量的长期变化模式:基于术前和健康的解释。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1131-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000832.
7
Breaking bad news-what patients want and what they get: evaluating the SPIKES protocol in Germany.告知坏消息——患者想要的与实际得到的:在德国评估SPIKES协议
Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):707-711. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt582. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
8
The impact of clinical versus pathological staging in oral cavity carcinoma--a multi-institutional analysis of survival.口腔癌临床与病理分期对生存的影响——多机构分析。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Apr 11;42(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1916-0216-42-28.
9
Validation of the Arabic version of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire among cancer patients in Lebanon.验证黎巴嫩癌症患者的 EORTC 生活质量问卷阿拉伯文版。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Aug;22(6):1473-81. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0261-0. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
10
Assessment of quality of life for the patients with cervical cancer at different clinical stages.不同临床分期宫颈癌患者的生活质量评估
Chin J Cancer. 2013 May;32(5):275-82. doi: 10.5732/cjc.012.10047. Epub 2012 Jun 6.