Graif Corina, Matthews Stephen A
Pennsylvania State University.
Justice Q. 2017;34(6):1096-1125. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2016.1276951. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
Current models of neighborhood effects on victimization predominantly assume that residential neighborhoods function independent of their surroundings. Yet, a surprising proportion of violence occurs outside of victims' residential neighborhoods. The current study extends on recent advances in spatial dynamics and neighborhood effects to explore the importance of different geographic scales and relational exposures to poverty for child violent victimization. We examine longitudinal data on over 4,400 low-income children from high poverty neighborhoods in five cities, who participated in the Moving to Opportunity randomized intervention. The results suggest that surrounding poverty matters for child victimization beyond the effect of residential poverty. Moreover, moving farther from extreme poverty also seems to buffer against victimization and to amplify the benefits of moving to improved extended (residential and surrounding) neighborhoods. All children in the study, but especially boys older than 10 years of age, seemed to be affected by the long arm of poverty.
当前关于邻里环境对受害影响的模型主要假定居民邻里环境独立于其周边环境发挥作用。然而,令人惊讶的是,相当一部分暴力事件发生在受害者居住的邻里之外。本研究基于空间动态和邻里效应的最新进展,探讨不同地理尺度以及与贫困的关系暴露对儿童暴力受害的重要性。我们研究了来自五个城市高贫困社区的4400多名低收入儿童的纵向数据,这些儿童参与了“搬到机会”随机干预项目。结果表明,除了居住贫困的影响之外,周边贫困对儿童受害也很重要。此外,搬离极端贫困地区似乎也能缓冲受害情况,并放大搬到改善后的扩展(居住和周边)社区的益处。研究中的所有儿童,尤其是10岁以上的男孩,似乎都受到了贫困的深远影响。