• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度尼西亚版库贾拉评分对髌股疼痛综合征患者的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the Kujala Score for Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

作者信息

Mustamsir Edi, Phatama Krisna Yuarno, Pratianto Arimurti, Pradana Ananto Satya, Sukmajaya William Putera, Pandiangan Ray Asaf Hexa, Abduh Muhammad, Hidayat Mohamad

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Saiful Anwar General Hospital-Brawijaya University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 May 28;8(5):2325967120922943. doi: 10.1177/2325967120922943. eCollection 2020 May.

DOI:10.1177/2325967120922943
PMID:32523969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7257862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Kujala score is a useful diagnostic tool to evaluate patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). However, no validated Indonesian version of the Kujala score has been available.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an Indonesian version of the Kujala score.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study to develop an Indonesian version of the Kujala score by using a forward-backward translation protocol. The resulting questionnaire was given to 51 patients diagnosed with PFPS. The validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by correlating the final score with the Indonesian version of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Reliability was measured by evaluating the internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]).

RESULTS

The Indonesian version of the Kujala score had a positive correlation with the physical components of the SF-36. The internal consistency was fairly high (α = .74), and the test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC, 0.996).

CONCLUSION

The Indonesian version of the Kujala score was proven to be a valid and reliable tool to diagnose PFPS. Future epidemiological studies could implement this score to find the prevalence of PFPS in Indonesia. Further, ensuing studies could explore the application of this scoring system in posttreatment and postoperative settings.

摘要

背景

库贾拉评分是评估髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)的一种有用的诊断工具。然而,目前尚无经过验证的印尼语版库贾拉评分。

目的

开发并验证印尼语版的库贾拉评分。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据等级,3级。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,采用前后翻译协议来开发印尼语版的库贾拉评分。将生成的问卷发给51名被诊断为PFPS的患者。通过将最终得分与印尼语版36项简短健康调查(SF-36)进行关联来评估问卷的有效性。通过评估内部一致性(克朗巴赫α系数)和重测信度(组内相关系数[ICC])来衡量信度。

结果

印尼语版的库贾拉评分与SF-36的身体成分呈正相关。内部一致性相当高(α = 0.74),重测信度极佳(ICC,0.996)。

结论

印尼语版的库贾拉评分被证明是诊断PFPS的有效且可靠的工具。未来的流行病学研究可以采用这个评分来找出印尼PFPS的患病率。此外,后续研究可以探索这个评分系统在治疗后和术后环境中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84c7/7257862/a0fd9bf2d265/10.1177_2325967120922943-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84c7/7257862/a0fd9bf2d265/10.1177_2325967120922943-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84c7/7257862/a0fd9bf2d265/10.1177_2325967120922943-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the Kujala Score for Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.印度尼西亚版库贾拉评分对髌股疼痛综合征患者的有效性和可靠性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 May 28;8(5):2325967120922943. doi: 10.1177/2325967120922943. eCollection 2020 May.
2
The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument: validity and reliability of an Indonesian version.Banff 髌股不稳症评估工具:印度尼西亚版本的效度和信度。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Apr;33(3):617-622. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03336-6. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
The validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Kujala score for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.针对髌股关节疼痛综合征患者的泰国版库亚拉评分的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Oct;38(21):2161-4. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1114035. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
4
Greek cultural adaption and validation of the Kujala anterior knee pain scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.希腊文化对髌股疼痛综合征患者库贾拉前膝痛量表的适应性调整及验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Apr;39(7):704-708. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1161834. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties of the Indonesian Kujala Score for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Patients.印度尼西亚前交叉韧带撕裂患者库贾拉评分的跨文化适应与测量特性
Malays Orthop J. 2022 Jul;16(2):23-30. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2207.003.
6
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: Validity and Reliability of an Indonesian Version.膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分:印尼语版本的有效性与可靠性
Ochsner J. 2021 Spring;21(1):63-67. doi: 10.31486/toj.20.0088.
7
Persian translation and validation of the Kujala Patellofemoral Scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.波斯语翻译及髌股疼痛综合征患者的 Kujala 髌股量表验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2259-63. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.683480. Epub 2012 May 27.
8
Validation of the German version of the Kujala score in patients with patellofemoral instability: a prospective multi-centre study.德国版库亚拉评分在髌股关节不稳患者中的验证:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Apr;138(4):527-535. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2881-5. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
Validation of the Arabic version of the Kujala patellofemoral pain scoring system.库亚拉髌股关节疼痛评分系统阿拉伯语版本的验证
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Mar;24(2):290-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
10
Validity of the Turkish version of the Kujala patellofemoral score in patellofemoral pain syndrome.库贾拉髌股关节评分土耳其语版本在髌股关节疼痛综合征中的效度
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(2):152-6. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2252.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterior Knee Pain Evaluation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using Anterior Half of The Peroneus Longus (AHPL) Autograft.使用腓骨长肌前半部分(AHPL)自体移植物进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后前膝痛的评估
Orthop Res Rev. 2025 Feb 12;17:83-93. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S495410. eCollection 2025.
2
Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS): structural and criterion validity in Brazilian population with patellofemoral pain.前膝痛量表(AKPS):巴西髌股疼痛人群中的结构和标准效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 8;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07164-z.
3
Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of the quadriceps tendon cross-sectional area as an adjunctive diagnostic parameter in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of patellofemoral pain and knee pain in the general population of Chinese young adults: a community-based questionnaire survey.中国年轻成年人普通人群中髌股关节疼痛和膝关节疼痛的患病率:一项基于社区的问卷调查
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 May 24;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2083-x.
2
Exercise therapy, patient education, and patellar taping in the treatment of adolescents with patellofemoral pain: a prospective pilot study with 6 months follow-up.运动疗法、患者教育和髌骨贴扎治疗青少年髌股疼痛:一项为期6个月随访的前瞻性试点研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Apr 13;4:73. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0227-7. eCollection 2018.
3
磁共振成像评估股四头肌腱横截面积在髌股疼痛综合征患者中的辅助诊断价值。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 Aug 21;34(3):565-570. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1246.
4
Patellofemoral functional outcome of gracilis sparing compared to gracilis sacrificing ACL reconstruction.与牺牲股薄肌的前交叉韧带重建相比,保留股薄肌的髌股关节功能结果。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Dec 1;84:104940. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104940. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties of the Indonesian Kujala Score for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Patients.印度尼西亚前交叉韧带撕裂患者库贾拉评分的跨文化适应与测量特性
Malays Orthop J. 2022 Jul;16(2):23-30. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2207.003.
6
Auxiliary Diagnostic Method for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Based on One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.基于一维卷积神经网络的髌股疼痛综合征辅助诊断方法。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 16;9:615597. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.615597. eCollection 2021.
Validation of the German version of the Kujala score in patients with patellofemoral instability: a prospective multi-centre study.
德国版库亚拉评分在髌股关节不稳患者中的验证:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Apr;138(4):527-535. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2881-5. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
4
Incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.髌股关节疼痛的发病率和患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190892. eCollection 2018.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale: Applications for Use as an Epidemiologic Screener.前膝痛量表的信度与效度:作为流行病学筛查工具的应用
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159204. eCollection 2016.
6
2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester. Part 1: Terminology, definitions, clinical examination, natural history, patellofemoral osteoarthritis and patient-reported outcome measures.2016年第四届国际髌股关节疼痛研究研讨会(曼彻斯特)髌股关节疼痛共识声明。第1部分:术语、定义、临床检查、自然病史、髌股关节骨关节炎及患者报告结局指标。
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(14):839-43. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096384. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
7
The validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Kujala score for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.针对髌股关节疼痛综合征患者的泰国版库亚拉评分的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Oct;38(21):2161-4. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1114035. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
8
Reliability of the Dutch translation of the Kujala Patellofemoral Score Questionnaire.库亚拉髌股关节评分问卷荷兰语翻译的可靠性。
Physiother Res Int. 2017 Jan;22(1). doi: 10.1002/pri.1649. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
9
DEMOGRAPHIC AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL TRENDS IN PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN.髌股关节疼痛的人口统计学和流行病学趋势
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Jun;10(3):281-90.
10
Validation and cultural adaptation of "Kujala Score" in Spanish.“库亚拉评分”西班牙语版的验证与文化适应性调整
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Sep;24(9):2845-2853. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3521-z. Epub 2015 Feb 4.