Suppr超能文献

不同行配置下玉米-大豆间作中氮、磷、钾的吸收利用与产量优势的关系。

Uptake and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as related to yield advantage in maize-soybean intercropping under different row configurations.

机构信息

College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, People's Republic of China.

Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Chengdu, 611130, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 11;10(1):9504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66459-y.

Abstract

Intercropping advantage occurs only when each species has adequate time and space to maximize cooperation and minimize competition between them. A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years between 2013 and 2014 to investigate the effects of maize and soybean relay strip intercropping systems on the uptake and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. The treatments included "40:160" (T1, maize narrow and wide row spacing of 40 and 160 cm, where two rows of soybean with a 40 cm row were planted in the wide rows. The area occupation ratio of maize and soybean both were 50% of the every experimental block), "80:120" (T2, maize narrow and wide row spacing of 80 and 120 cm, the soybean planting was the same as T1 treatment. The area occupation ratio of maize and soybean were 60% and 40% of the every experimental block), "100:100" (T3, one row of maize and one row of soybean with a 100-cm row. The area occupation ratio of maize and soybean was the same as T1 treatment), sole cropping of maize (CK1, The area occupation ratio of maize was 100% of the every experimental block), and sole cropping of soybean (CK2, The area occupation ratio of soybean was 100% of the every experimental block). The results show that, compared with the sole cropping system (sole maize), the economic yields in T1, T2, and T3 treatments increased by 761, 536, and 458 kg·ha, respectively, and the biological yields increased by 2410, 2127, and 1588 kg·ha. The uptake and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in T1, T2, and T3 treatments were significantly higher than those in sole crops, and the nutrient advantage is mainly due to nutrient uptake rather than nutrient use efficiency. The land equivalent ratio values in T1, T2, and T3 treatments were 1.43, 1.32, and 1.20, respectively. In particular, the economic and biological yield in T1 treatment exhibited potential as an intercropping pattern.

摘要

间作优势仅在每种作物都有足够的时间和空间来最大限度地促进合作和最小化竞争时才会出现。2013 年至 2014 年期间进行了一项田间试验,以研究玉米和大豆间作系统对氮、磷、钾吸收和利用的影响。处理包括“40:160”(T1,玉米窄行和宽行间距分别为 40 和 160cm,在宽行中种植两行间距为 40cm 的大豆。玉米和大豆的面积占有率均为每个实验小区的 50%)、“80:120”(T2,玉米窄行和宽行间距分别为 80 和 120cm,种植大豆的方式与 T1 处理相同。玉米和大豆的面积占有率分别为每个实验小区的 60%和 40%)、“100:100”(T3,玉米和大豆各一行,行间距为 100cm。玉米和大豆的面积占有率与 T1 处理相同)、玉米单作(CK1,玉米面积占有率为每个实验小区的 100%)和大豆单作(CK2,大豆面积占有率为每个实验小区的 100%)。结果表明,与单作系统(单作玉米)相比,T1、T2 和 T3 处理的经济产量分别增加了 761、536 和 458kg·ha-1,生物产量分别增加了 2410、2127 和 1588kg·ha-1。T1、T2 和 T3 处理氮、磷、钾的吸收和利用均显著高于单作,养分优势主要归因于养分吸收而不是养分利用效率。T1、T2 和 T3 处理的土地当量比分别为 1.43、1.32 和 1.20。特别是 T1 处理的经济和生物产量表现出作为间作模式的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a02/7290029/dac53e127013/41598_2020_66459_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验