Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 15, Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
J Anesth. 2020 Oct;34(5):702-711. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02813-8. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
The aim of the study is to compare the femoral triangle (FT) and adductor canal (AC) blocks in terms of the analgesic efficacy and ambulatory outcomes in the context of multimodal analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Patients presenting for TKA were assigned to a preoperative ultrasound-guided single-injection FT or AC block. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine was administered for TKA. Perioperatively a multimodal analgesic regimen was applied up to 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome was the average pain score during movement in the first 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during movement at postoperative predetermined time points, cumulative opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents, functional mobility measured by the timed "Up and Go" (TUG) test and muscle strength in the lower extremity.
Ninety-eight patients completed the study. Patients in the FT group had lower median pain scores during movement in the first 24 h postoperatively than those in the AC group (1.3 [1.0-3.3] vs. 3.0 [1.7-4.3]; median difference: - 1.0, adjusted 95% CI from - 1.7 to - 0.3, P = 0.010). There were significant differences in the pain scores at rest and during movement at 12 and 24 h postoperatively between the two groups (P = 0.008 and 0.005, respectively). Cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption in the first and second 24 h postoperatively, Functional mobility reflected by the TUG test and muscle strength in the lower extremity showed no significantly statistically differences between the two groups.
The preoperative FT block provided improved analgesic outcomes without compromising functional mobility in the context of multimodal analgesia following TKA compared with the AC block.
https://www.chictr.org.cn . Identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17012716.
本研究旨在比较股三角(FT)和收肌管(AC)阻滞在全膝关节置换术后(TKA)多模式镇痛背景下的镇痛效果和活动能力。
接受 TKA 的患者被分配到术前超声引导下的单次 FT 或 AC 阻滞。TKA 采用脊髓和硬膜外联合麻醉,布比卡因给药。围手术期应用多模式镇痛方案,术后 48 小时内。主要结局是术后 24 小时内运动时的平均疼痛评分。次要结局包括静息和运动时的疼痛评分、口服吗啡等效物的累积阿片类药物消耗、通过计时“Up and Go”(TUG)测试测量的功能移动性和下肢肌肉力量。
98 例患者完成了研究。FT 组患者术后 24 小时内运动时的中位疼痛评分低于 AC 组(1.3 [1.0-3.3] vs. 3.0 [1.7-4.3];中位数差:-1.0,调整后的 95%置信区间为-1.7 至-0.3,P=0.010)。两组患者在术后 12 和 24 小时的静息和运动时疼痛评分存在显著差异(P=0.008 和 0.005)。术后第 1 和第 2 个 24 小时内的口服吗啡等效物累积消耗、TUG 测试反映的功能移动性和下肢肌肉力量在两组之间无显著统计学差异。
与 AC 阻滞相比,在 TKA 后多模式镇痛的情况下,术前 FT 阻滞可提供更好的镇痛效果,而不会影响活动能力。