• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dr. Agent: Clinical predictive model via mimicked second opinions.医生代理人:通过模拟的二次意见进行临床预测模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1084-1091. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa074.
2
Combining structured and unstructured data for predictive models: a deep learning approach.将结构化和非结构化数据结合用于预测模型:一种深度学习方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 29;20(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01297-6.
3
ISeeU: Visually interpretable deep learning for mortality prediction inside the ICU.ISeeU:重症监护室内用于死亡率预测的可视觉解释深度学习。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Oct;98:103269. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103269. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
4
Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets.基于大型医疗保健数据集的深度学习模型基准测试。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:112-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
5
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
6
Predictive Analytics for Care and Management of Patients With Acute Diseases: Deep Learning-Based Method to Predict Crucial Complication Phenotypes.急性疾病患者的护理和管理中的预测分析:基于深度学习的关键并发症表型预测方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 12;23(2):e18372. doi: 10.2196/18372.
7
Multitask prediction of organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit using sequential subnetwork routing.使用序列子网路由对重症监护病房中的器官功能障碍进行多任务预测。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):1936-1946. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab101.
8
Consultation length and no-show prediction for improving appointment scheduling efficiency at a cardiology clinic: A data analytics approach.咨询时长和失约预测,以提高心脏病学诊所的预约安排效率:一种数据分析方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104290. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104290. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Bimodal learning via trilogy of skip-connection deep networks for diabetic retinopathy risk progression identification.通过 skip-connection 深度网络三部曲进行双模态学习,以识别糖尿病视网膜病变风险进展。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Dec;132:103926. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Multilevel Self-Attention Model and its Use on Medical Risk Prediction.多层次自注意力模型及其在医学风险预测中的应用。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2020;25:115-126.

引用本文的文献

1
Reinforcement Learning and Its Clinical Applications Within Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Precision Medicine and Dynamic Treatment Regimes.强化学习及其在医疗保健领域的临床应用:精准医学与动态治疗方案的系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 19;13(14):1752. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141752.
2
A comprehensive benchmark for COVID-19 predictive modeling using electronic health records in intensive care.使用重症监护中的电子健康记录进行COVID-19预测建模的综合基准。
Patterns (N Y). 2024 Mar 7;5(4):100951. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100951. eCollection 2024 Apr 12.
3
Predicting Risk of Mortality in Pediatric ICU Based on Ensemble Step-Wise Feature Selection.基于集成逐步特征选择预测儿科重症监护病房的死亡风险
Health Data Sci. 2021 May 31;2021:9365125. doi: 10.34133/2021/9365125. eCollection 2021.
4
Soft phenotyping for sepsis via EHR time-aware soft clustering.基于 EHR 的时间感知软聚类进行脓毒症的软表型分析。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Apr;152:104615. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104615. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
5
Timeline Registration for Electronic Health Records.电子健康记录的时间线注册
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:291-299. eCollection 2023.
6
Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review.基于机器学习的电子健康记录表型分析方法:系统评价
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jan 18;30(2):367-381. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac216.
7
Importance-aware personalized learning for early risk prediction using static and dynamic health data.基于静态和动态健康数据的重要性感知个性化学习的早期风险预测
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):713-726. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa306.

本文引用的文献

1
Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data.多任务学习与临床时间序列数据的基准测试。
Sci Data. 2019 Jun 17;6(1):96. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0103-9.
2
Optimal medication dosing from suboptimal clinical examples: a deep reinforcement learning approach.从次优临床实例中得出最佳药物剂量:一种深度强化学习方法。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:2978-2981. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591355.
3
MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database.MIMIC-III,一个免费获取的重症监护数据库。
Sci Data. 2016 May 24;3:160035. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.35.
4
Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.评估预测模型的性能:传统和新型指标的框架。
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2.

医生代理人:通过模拟的二次意见进行临床预测模型。

Dr. Agent: Clinical predictive model via mimicked second opinions.

机构信息

Analytics Center of Excellence, IQVIA, Beijing, China.

Analytics Center of Excellence, IQVIA, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1084-1091. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa074.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocaa074
PMID:32548622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647368/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prediction of disease phenotypes and their outcomes is a difficult task. In practice, patients routinely seek second opinions from multiple clinical experts for complex disease diagnosis. Our objective is to mimic such a practice of seeking second opinions by training 2 agents with different focuses: the primary agent studies the most recent visit of the patient to learn the current health status, and then the second-opinion agent considers the entire patient history to obtain a more global view.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our approach Dr. Agent augments recurrent neural networks with 2 policy gradient agents. Moreover, Dr. Agent is customized with various patient demographics information and learns a dynamic skip connection to focus on the relevant information over time. We trained Dr. Agent to perform 4 clinical prediction tasks on the publicly available MIMIC-III (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care) database: (1) in-hospital mortality prediction, (2) acute care phenotype classification, (3) physiologic decompensation prediction, and (4) forecasting length of stay. We compared the performance of Dr. Agent against 4 baseline clinical predictive models.

RESULTS

Dr. Agent outperforms baseline clinical prediction models across all 4 tasks in terms of all metrics. Compared with the best baseline model, Dr. Agent achieves up to 15% higher area under the precision-recall curve on different tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Dr. Agent can comprehensively model the long-term dependencies of patients' health status while considering patients' demographics using 2 agents, and therefore achieves better prediction performance on different clinical prediction tasks.

摘要

目的

预测疾病表型及其结果是一项艰巨的任务。在实践中,患者通常会为复杂疾病的诊断向多位临床专家寻求第二意见。我们的目标是通过训练 2 个具有不同侧重点的代理来模拟这种寻求第二意见的做法:主要代理研究患者最近的就诊情况,以了解当前的健康状况,然后第二意见代理考虑患者的整个病史,以获得更全面的观点。

材料与方法

我们的方法 Dr. Agent 通过 2 个策略梯度代理增强了递归神经网络。此外,Dr. Agent 可以根据各种患者人口统计学信息进行定制,并学习动态跳过连接,以随时间关注相关信息。我们训练 Dr. Agent 在公开的 MIMIC-III(重症监护医疗信息市场)数据库上执行 4 个临床预测任务:(1)住院期间死亡率预测,(2)急性护理表型分类,(3)生理失代偿预测,以及(4)预测住院时间。我们将 Dr. Agent 的性能与 4 个基线临床预测模型进行了比较。

结果

在所有 4 个任务中,Dr. Agent 在所有指标上均优于基线临床预测模型。与最佳基线模型相比,Dr. Agent 在不同任务上的精度-召回曲线下面积提高了高达 15%。

结论

Dr. Agent 可以通过 2 个代理全面建模患者健康状况的长期依赖性,同时考虑患者的人口统计学信息,因此在不同的临床预测任务中实现了更好的预测性能。