• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“这是我的责任吗?”:对大学生旁观者行为的定性综述。

"Is It My Responsibility?": A Qualitative Review of University Students' Perspectives on Bystander Behavior.

机构信息

The University of Texas, Arlington, TX, USA.

The University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jan;23(1):117-131. doi: 10.1177/1524838020933829. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1177/1524838020933829
PMID:32583732
Abstract

Bystander interventions focus on framing violence as a community problem and encourage all community members to act as prosocial bystanders if they witness a dangerous situation. Research has demonstrated there are multiple barriers and facilitators that might discourage or encourage an individual to act as a prosocial bystander. A qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) of existing literature was conducted to determine university students' perspectives on bystander facilitators and barriers. A systematic search of the literature was completed to identify articles that included university students' perspectives on bystander facilitators and barriers, utilized a qualitative methodology, and contained participant quotations in the published article. The search yielded 181 articles and after screening 10 articles were included in the QIMS. The original themes and participant quotations were qualitatively coded to develop five new themes: (1) the impact of alcohol, (2) beliefs about responsibility, (3) peer perceptions, (4) indicators and situational dilemmas, and (5) the role of friendship and group impact. The results of this synthesis reveal important implications for the continued development of bystander intervention programs for universities. By incorporating the perspectives of university students, bystander intervention programs may be more effective at encouraging students to be prosocial bystanders by confronting perceived barriers to intervention.

摘要

旁观者干预措施侧重于将暴力视为社区问题,并鼓励所有社区成员在目睹危险情况时作为亲社会的旁观者采取行动。研究表明,有多种障碍和促进因素可能会阻碍或鼓励个人作为亲社会的旁观者采取行动。对现有文献进行了定性解释性元综合分析(QIMS),以确定大学生对旁观者促进因素和障碍的看法。系统地搜索文献,以确定包含大学生对旁观者促进因素和障碍的看法、使用定性方法以及在已发表的文章中包含参与者引述的文章。搜索结果产生了 181 篇文章,经过筛选,有 10 篇文章被纳入 QIMS。原始主题和参与者引述被定性编码,以开发出五个新主题:(1)酒精的影响,(2)责任观念,(3)同伴看法,(4)指标和情境困境,以及(5)友谊和群体影响的作用。这一综合研究的结果为大学继续开展旁观者干预计划提供了重要启示。通过纳入大学生的观点,旁观者干预计划可能更有效地鼓励学生成为亲社会的旁观者,从而应对干预的感知障碍。

相似文献

1
"Is It My Responsibility?": A Qualitative Review of University Students' Perspectives on Bystander Behavior.“这是我的责任吗?”:对大学生旁观者行为的定性综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jan;23(1):117-131. doi: 10.1177/1524838020933829. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
College Students' Perceptions of Barriers to Bystander Intervention.大学生对旁观者干预障碍的认知。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Aug;35(15-16):2971-2992. doi: 10.1177/0886260517706764. Epub 2017 May 1.
3
Undergraduate Students as Bystanders to Sexual Violence Risks: Differences in Reported Intervention Opportunities and Behaviors by Racial Identity.本科学生作为性暴力风险的旁观者:种族认同差异对报告的干预机会和行为的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):4668-4689. doi: 10.1177/0886260518790593. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
Revising existing instruments for measuring bystander intervention opportunity and frequency of prosocial response for the prevention of sexual violence.修订现有的旁观者干预机会和促进亲社会反应频率的工具,以预防性暴力。
Inj Prev. 2019 Jun;25(3):180-183. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042653. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention.行动还是不行动,这是个问题?旁观者干预的障碍和促进因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Feb;29(3):476-96. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505210. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
6
Preventing Sexual Violence Through Bystander Intervention: Attitudes, Behaviors, Missed Opportunities, and Barriers to Intervention Among Australian University Students.通过旁观者干预预防性暴力:澳大利亚大学生的态度、行为、错失的机会及干预障碍
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):2816-2840. doi: 10.1177/0886260518764395. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
7
How Community and Peer Perceptions Promote College Students' Pro-Social Bystander Actions to Prevent Sexual Violence.社区和同伴认知如何促进大学生采取亲社会旁观者行动以预防性暴力
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Apr;36(7-8):3855-3879. doi: 10.1177/0886260518777557. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
8
The Chivalrous Bystander: The Role of Gender-Based Beliefs and Empathy on Bystander Behavior and Perceived Barriers to Intervention.侠义旁观者:基于性别的信念和同理心对旁观者行为及感知到的干预障碍的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jan;37(1-2):863-888. doi: 10.1177/0886260520916277. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
9
Beyond Yes or No: Understanding Undergraduate Students' Responses as Bystanders to Sexual Assault Risk Situations.超越是与否:理解大学生对性侵犯风险情境的旁观者反应。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):5772-5796. doi: 10.1177/0886260517723143. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
10
"She Wasn't Resisting": Students' Barriers to Prosocial Intervention as Bystanders to Sexual Assault Risk Situations.“她没有反抗”:作为性侵犯风险情境的旁观者,学生进行亲社会干预的障碍。
Violence Against Women. 2019 Mar;25(4):485-505. doi: 10.1177/1077801218790697. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact on Spanish women of previous workplace victimization experiences of workplace sexual harassment on the responsibility to intervene as bystander: Mediating roles of myth acceptance and perceived severity.以往工作场所性骚扰受害经历对西班牙女性作为旁观者进行干预的责任感的影响:对神话的接受程度和感知严重程度的中介作用
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;24(3):100497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100497. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
2
Assessing the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Initial Efficacy of a Multiple Behavior Change Intervention Addressing Alcohol Use, Sexual Risk-Taking, and Bystander Intervention.评估一项针对饮酒、性冒险行为及旁观者干预的多行为改变干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步效果。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 Mar;86(2):246-260. doi: 10.15288/jsad.24-00009. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
The Lived Experience of Racism in the Sikh Community.锡克社区中的种族主义经历。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Jun;39(11-12):2415-2436. doi: 10.1177/08862605231218225. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Bystander Intervention in Intimate Partner Violence: A Scoping Review of Experiences and Outcomes.旁观者干预亲密伴侣暴力:经验和结果的范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jul;25(3):1799-1813. doi: 10.1177/15248380231195886. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
5
A Systematic Review Exploring Variables Related to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Violence Contexts.一项探索性暴力情境中旁观者干预相关变量的系统评价
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jul;24(3):1727-1742. doi: 10.1177/15248380221079660. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
6
Barriers to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Harassment: The Dark Triad and Rape Myth acceptance in Indonesia, Singapore, and United Kingdom.旁观者干预性骚扰的障碍:印度尼西亚、新加坡和英国的黑暗人格三联征和强奸谬论接受度。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22151-NP22174. doi: 10.1177/08862605211072150. Epub 2022 Feb 15.