Pinto Soraia, Carrageta David F, Alves Marco G, Rocha António, Agarwal Ashok, Barros Alberto, Oliveira Pedro F
Centre for Reproductive Genetics A. Barros, Porto, Portugal.
Department of Microscopy and Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Andrologia. 2021 Mar;53(2):e13725. doi: 10.1111/and.13725. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
The application of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has revolutionised the treatment of human infertility, giving hope to the patients previously considered incapable of establishing pregnancy. While semen analysis is performed to access whether a sample has an adequate number of viable, motile and morphologically normal sperm cells able to achieve fertilisation, sperm selection techniques for ART aim to isolate the most competent spermatozoon which is characterised by the highest fertilising potential. Based on the semen analysis results, the correct sperm selection technique must be chosen and applied. In this review, different sperm selection strategies for retrieving spermatozoa with the highest fertilising potential and their impact on ART outcomes are discussed. In addition, advantages and disadvantages of each method and the best suited techniques for each clinical scenario are described.
辅助生殖技术(ART)的应用彻底改变了人类不孕症的治疗方式,为以前被认为无法怀孕的患者带来了希望。虽然进行精液分析是为了确定样本中是否有足够数量的有活力、能运动且形态正常的精子细胞以实现受精,但ART的精子选择技术旨在分离出具有最高受精潜力的最有能力的精子。根据精液分析结果,必须选择并应用正确的精子选择技术。在本综述中,讨论了用于获取具有最高受精潜力精子的不同精子选择策略及其对ART结果的影响。此外,还描述了每种方法的优缺点以及每种临床情况最适合的技术。