Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Oct;60(4):828-846.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
The use of continuous sedation until death (CSD) has been highly debated for many years. It is unknown how the use of CSD evolves over time. Reports suggest that there is an international increase in the use of CSD for terminally ill patients.
To gain insight in developments in the use of CSD in various countries and subpopulations.
We performed a search of the literature published between January 2000 and April 2020, in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library by using the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols guidelines. The search contained the following terms: continuous sedation, terminal sedation, palliative sedation, deep sedation, end-of-life sedation, sedation practice, and sedation until death.
We found 23 articles on 16 nationwide studies and 38 articles on 37 subpopulation studies. In nationwide studies on frequencies of CSD in deceased persons varied from 3% in Denmark in 2001 to 18% in The Netherlands in 2015. Nationwide studies indicate an increase in the use of CSD. Frequencies of CSD in the different subpopulations varied too widely to observe time trends. Over the years, more studies reported on the use of CSD for nonphysical symptoms including fear, anxiety, and psycho-existential distress. In some studies, there was an increase in requests for sedation of patients from their families.
The frequency of CSD seems to increase over time, possibly partly because of an extension of indications for sedation, from mainly physical symptoms to also nonphysical symptoms.
多年来,人们一直在高度讨论持续镇静直至死亡(CSD)的使用问题。目前尚不清楚 CSD 的使用随时间如何演变。有报告表明,在终末期患者中,CSD 的使用在国际范围内有所增加。
深入了解不同国家和亚人群中 CSD 使用的发展情况。
我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目指南,在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo 和 Cochrane Library 中对 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 4 月期间发表的文献进行了检索,检索词包括持续镇静、终末期镇静、姑息镇静、深度镇静、生命终末期镇静、镇静实践和镇静直至死亡。
我们发现了 23 篇关于 16 项全国性研究的文章和 38 篇关于 37 项亚人群研究的文章。在关于死亡者中 CSD 频率的全国性研究中,CSD 的频率从 2001 年丹麦的 3%到 2015 年荷兰的 18%不等。全国性研究表明 CSD 的使用有所增加。不同亚人群中 CSD 的频率差异太大,无法观察到时间趋势。多年来,越来越多的研究报告了 CSD 用于非躯体症状,包括恐惧、焦虑和心理存在困境。在一些研究中,患者家属要求镇静的请求有所增加。
CSD 的频率似乎随时间推移而增加,这可能部分是由于镇静指征的扩展,从主要是躯体症状扩展到非躯体症状。