Suppr超能文献

前瞻性研究中姑息性镇静的临床方面。系统评价。

Clinical Aspects of Palliative Sedation in Prospective Studies. A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, ATLANTES, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; IdISNA, Pamplona, Spain.

Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, ATLANTES, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; IdISNA, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Apr;61(4):831-844.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.022. Epub 2020 Sep 19.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Near the end of life when patients experience refractory symptoms, palliative sedation may be considered as a last treatment. Clinical guidelines have been developed, but they are mainly based on expert opinion or retrospective chart reviews. Therefore, evidence for the clinical aspects of palliative sedation is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To explore clinical aspects of palliative sedation in recent prospective studies.

METHODS

Systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered at PROSPERO. PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched (January 2014-December 2019), combining sedation, palliative care, and prospective. Article quality was assessed.

RESULTS

Ten prospective articles were included, involving predominantly patients with cancer. Most frequently reported refractory symptoms were delirium (41%-83%), pain (25%-65%), and dyspnea (16%-59%). In some articles, psychological and existential distress were mentioned (16%-59%). Only a few articles specified the tools used to assess symptoms. Level of sedation assessment tools were the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, Ramsay Sedation Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Bispectral Index monitoring. The palliative sedation practice shows an underlying need for proportionality in relation to symptom intensity. Midazolam was the main sedative used. Other reported medications were phenobarbital, promethazine, and anesthetic medication-propofol. The only study that reported level of patient's discomfort as a palliative sedation outcome showed a decrease in patient discomfort.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of refractory symptoms should include physical evaluation with standardized tools applied and interviews for psychological and existential evaluation by expert clinicians working in teams. Future research needs to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative sedation for refractory symptom relief.

摘要

背景

在生命末期,当患者出现难治性症状时,可能会考虑姑息性镇静作为最后的治疗手段。已经制定了临床指南,但它们主要基于专家意见或回顾性图表审查。因此,需要姑息性镇静的临床方面的证据。

目的

探索最近前瞻性研究中姑息性镇静的临床方面。

方法

按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行系统评价,并在 PROSPERO 上注册。检索了 PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE(2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月),结合镇静、姑息治疗和前瞻性。评估了文章质量。

结果

纳入了 10 篇前瞻性文章,主要涉及癌症患者。最常报告的难治性症状是谵妄(41%-83%)、疼痛(25%-65%)和呼吸困难(16%-59%)。在一些文章中,还提到了心理和存在的困扰(16%-59%)。只有少数几篇文章具体说明了用于评估症状的工具。镇静评估工具的水平是里士满躁动镇静量表、拉姆齐镇静量表、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和双频谱指数监测。姑息性镇静实践表明,需要与症状强度成比例。咪达唑仑是主要的镇静剂。其他报道的药物有苯巴比妥、异丙嗪和麻醉药物-丙泊酚。唯一一篇报告姑息性镇静作为难治性症状缓解结果的患者不适水平的研究显示,患者不适程度有所下降。

结论

难治性症状的评估应包括物理评估,使用标准化工具,并由在团队中工作的专家临床医生进行心理和存在评估的访谈。未来的研究需要评估姑息性镇静对难治性症状缓解的效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验