Global Obesity Centre Institute for Health Transformation Deakin University Geelong Australia.
Biostatistics Unit Faculty of Health Deakin University Geelong Australia.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jul 7;9(13):e015189. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015189. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
Background Waist circumference and hip circumference are both strongly associated with risk of death; however, their joint association has rarely been investigated. Methods and Results The MONICA Risk, Genetics, Archiving, and Monograph (MORGAM) Project was conducted in 30 cohorts from 11 countries; 90 487 men and women, aged 30 to 74 years, predominantly white, with no history of cardiovascular disease, were recruited in 1986 to 2010 and followed up for up to 24 years. Hazard ratios were estimated using sex-specific Cox models, stratified by cohort, with age as the time scale. Models included baseline categorical obesity measures, age, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure antihypertensive drugs, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. A total of 9105 all-cause deaths were recorded during a median follow-up of 10 years. Hazard ratios for all-cause death presented J- or U-shaped associations with most obesity measures. With waist and hip circumference included in the same model, for all hip sizes, having a smaller waist was strongly associated with lower risk of death, except for men with the smallest hips. In addition, among those with smaller waists, hip size was strongly negatively associated with risk of death, with ≈20% more people identified as being at increased risk compared with waist circumference alone. Conclusions A more complex relationship between hip circumference, waist circumference, and risk of death is revealed when both measures are considered simultaneously. This is particularly true for individuals with smaller waists, where having larger hips was protective. Considering both waist and hip circumference in the clinical setting could help to best identify those at increased risk of death.
腰围和臀围均与死亡风险密切相关,但两者联合的关联却鲜有研究。
MONICA 风险、遗传学、存档和专论(MORGAM)项目在 11 个国家的 30 个队列中进行;共有 90487 名年龄在 30 至 74 岁之间、主要为白人、无心血管疾病史的男性和女性于 1986 年至 2010 年被招募,并随访了长达 24 年。使用按队列分层的性别特异性 Cox 模型估计风险比,年龄为时间尺度。模型包括基线分类肥胖指标、年龄、总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、收缩压、降压药物、吸烟和糖尿病。在中位随访 10 年期间共记录了 9105 例全因死亡。全因死亡的风险比与大多数肥胖指标呈 J 形或 U 形关联。当将腰围和臀围纳入同一模型时,对于所有臀围大小,腰围较小与较低的死亡风险强烈相关,但对于臀围最小的男性除外。此外,在腰围较小的人群中,臀围大小与死亡风险呈强烈负相关,与仅考虑腰围相比,约有 20%的人被确定为死亡风险增加。
当同时考虑这两个指标时,臀围、腰围与死亡风险之间的关系更加复杂。对于腰围较小的个体来说尤其如此,其中臀围较大具有保护作用。在临床环境中同时考虑腰围和臀围可以帮助更好地识别死亡风险增加的人群。