Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;163-164:65-83. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
Significant research and preclinical investment in cancer nanomedicine has produced several products, which have improved cancer care. Nevertheless, there exists a perception that cancer nanomedicine 'has not lived up to its promise' because the number of approved products and their clinical performance are modest. Many of these analyses do not consider the long clinical history and many clinical products developed from iron oxide nanoparticles. Iron oxide nanoparticles have enjoyed clinical use for about nine decades demonstrating safety, and considerable clinical utility and versatility. FDA-approved applications of iron oxide nanoparticles include cancer diagnosis, cancer hyperthermia therapy, and iron deficiency anemia. For cancer nanomedicine, this wealth of clinical experience is invaluable to provide key lessons and highlight pitfalls in the pursuit of nanotechnology-based cancer therapeutics. We review the clinical experience with systemic liposomal drug delivery and parenteral therapy of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) with iron oxide nanoparticles. We note that the clinical success of injectable iron exploits the inherent interaction between nanoparticles and the (innate) immune system, which designers of liposomal drug delivery seek to avoid. Magnetic fluid hyperthermia, a cancer therapy that harnesses magnetic hysteresis heating is approved for treating humans only with iron oxide nanoparticles. Despite its successful demonstration to enhance overall survival in clinical trials, this nanotechnology-based thermal medicine struggles to establish a clinical presence. We review the physical and biological attributes of this approach, and suggest reasons for barriers to its acceptance. Finally, despite the extensive clinical experience with iron oxide nanoparticles new and exciting research points to surprising immune-modulating potential. Recent data demonstrate the interactions between immune cells and iron oxide nanoparticles can induce anti-tumor immune responses. These present new and exciting opportunities to explore additional applications with this venerable technology. Clinical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles present poignant case studies of the opportunities, complexities, and challenges in cancer nanomedicine. They also illustrate the need for revised paradigms and multidisciplinary approaches to develop and translate nanomedicines into clinical cancer care.
癌症纳米医学的大量研究和临床前投资已经产生了一些产品,这些产品改善了癌症的治疗效果。然而,人们认为癌症纳米医学“没有辜负它的承诺”,因为批准的产品数量及其临床表现都很温和。许多这些分析都没有考虑到氧化铁纳米颗粒的悠久临床历史和许多临床产品。氧化铁纳米颗粒已经安全地用于临床近 90 年,具有相当大的临床实用性和多功能性。美国食品和药物管理局批准的氧化铁纳米颗粒的应用包括癌症诊断、癌症热疗和缺铁性贫血。对于癌症纳米医学来说,这种丰富的临床经验是无价的,可以提供关键的经验教训,并突出纳米技术癌症治疗的陷阱。我们回顾了系统脂质体药物输送和氧化铁纳米颗粒治疗缺铁性贫血(IDA)的临床经验。我们注意到,注射用铁的临床成功利用了纳米颗粒与(先天)免疫系统之间的固有相互作用,而脂质体药物输送的设计者则试图避免这种相互作用。磁流体热疗是一种利用磁滞加热的癌症治疗方法,仅批准使用氧化铁纳米颗粒治疗人类。尽管它在临床试验中成功地证明了提高总体生存率,但这种基于纳米技术的热疗药物在临床上仍难以立足。我们回顾了这种方法的物理和生物学特性,并提出了其被接受的障碍的原因。最后,尽管氧化铁纳米颗粒有着广泛的临床经验,但新的令人兴奋的研究表明其具有令人惊讶的免疫调节潜力。最近的数据表明,免疫细胞与氧化铁纳米颗粒之间的相互作用可以诱导抗肿瘤免疫反应。这些为利用这项古老技术探索更多应用提供了新的令人兴奋的机会。氧化铁纳米颗粒的临床应用为癌症纳米医学提供了机会、复杂性和挑战的鲜明案例研究。它们还说明了需要修订范式和多学科方法,以将纳米药物开发和转化为癌症临床治疗。