Raspa Federica, Tarantola Martina, Bergero Domenico, Bellino Claudio, Mastrazzo Chiara Maria, Visconti Alice, Valvassori Ermenegildo, Vervuert Ingrid, Valle Emanuela
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.
Public Veterinary Service, ASL TO5 Piedmont, Italy.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jun 26;10(6):1103. doi: 10.3390/ani10061103.
Horses kept for meat production are reared in intensive breeding farms. We employed a checklist adapted from the Animal Welfare Indicators (AWIN) assessment protocol. Our evaluation aims to assess whether welfare indicators are influenced by stocking densities (m/horse) and feeding strategies applied. An analysis was carried out on the data obtained from 7 surveys conducted at a single horse farm designed for meat production. In each survey, the same 12 pens were assessed, but on each occasion, the horses in the pens had been changed as had the stocking densities. Briefly, 561 horses aged 16 ± 8 months (mean ± standard deviation) were evaluated. Two stocking density cut-off values (median and 75th percentile: 3.95 and 4.75 m/horse, respectively) were applied to investigate the effect of stocking density on horse welfare. Data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests ( < 0.05). When cut-off was set as the median percentile, lower stocking density was associated with improvements in body condition score (BCS), coat cleanliness and bedding quantity, less coughing, less resting in a standing position, and less feeding related to the greater space available at the feed bunk. When the 75th percentile cut-off was used, indicators that improved were coat cleanliness, bedding quantity and mane and tail condition, as well as less resting in standing position and less feeding related to the greater space available at the feed bunk. Accordingly, the use of two different stocking density cut-off values showed that the increase of space allowance affected specific welfare indicators. Further increment of space and/or changes in management regimes should be investigated to improve all the indicators. Moreover, results related to feeding indicated the need to intervene as starch intakes exceeded recommended safe levels, negatively affecting horse welfare.
用于肉类生产的马匹饲养在集约化养殖场。我们采用了一份根据动物福利指标(AWIN)评估协议改编的检查表。我们的评估旨在评估福利指标是否受到饲养密度(平方米/匹马)和所采用的饲养策略的影响。对从一个专门用于肉类生产的单一马场进行的7次调查所获得的数据进行了分析。在每次调查中,对相同的12个畜栏进行评估,但每次畜栏中的马匹以及饲养密度都有所变化。简而言之,对561匹年龄为16±8个月(平均值±标准差)的马匹进行了评估。应用了两个饲养密度临界值(中位数和第75百分位数:分别为3.95和4.75平方米/匹马)来研究饲养密度对马匹福利的影响。使用曼-惠特尼U检验和费舍尔精确检验(P<0.05)对数据进行分析。当以中位数百分位数作为临界值时,较低的饲养密度与体况评分(BCS)的改善、被毛清洁度和垫料量的增加、咳嗽减少、站立休息减少以及与饲料槽处更大空间相关的采食减少有关。当使用第75百分位数临界值时,改善的指标包括被毛清洁度、垫料量以及鬃毛和尾巴状况,还有站立休息减少以及与饲料槽处更大空间相关的采食减少。因此,使用两个不同的饲养密度临界值表明空间允许量的增加会影响特定的福利指标。应研究进一步增加空间和/或改变管理制度以改善所有指标。此外,与饲养相关的结果表明,由于淀粉摄入量超过推荐的安全水平,对马匹福利产生负面影响,因此需要进行干预。