• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IOTA-ADNEX模型在鉴别附件包块特征方面的验证:与主观评估的比较

Validation of IOTA-ADNEX Model in Discriminating Characteristics of Adnexal Masses: A Comparison with Subjective Assessment.

作者信息

Jeong Soo Young, Park Byung Kwan, Lee Yoo Young, Kim Tae-Joong

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 26;9(6):2010. doi: 10.3390/jcm9062010.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9062010
PMID:32604883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7356034/
Abstract

(1) Background: The aim of this study is to compare the IOTA-ADNEX (international ovarian tumor analysis-assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa) model with gynecologic experts in differentiating ovarian diseases. (2) Methods: All participants in this prospective study underwent ultrasonography (US) equipped with the IOTA-ADNEX model and subjective assessment by a sonographic expert. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also generated to compare overall accuracies. The optimal cut-off value of the ADNEX model for excluding benign diseases was calculated. (3) Results: Fifty-nine participants were eligible: 54 and 5 underwent surgery and follow-up computed tomography (CT), respectively. Benign and malignant diseases were confirmed in 49 (83.1%) and 10 (16.9%) participants, respectively. The specificity of the ADNEX model was 0.816 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.680-0.912) in all participants and 0.795 (95% CI, 0.647-0.902) in the surgical group. The area under the ROC curve of the ADNEX model (0.924) was not significantly different from that of subjective assessment (0.953 in all participants, 0.951 in the surgical group; = 0.391 in all participants, = 0.407 in the surgical group). The optimal cut-off point using the ADNEX model was 47.3%, with a specificity of 0.977 (95% CI: 0.880-0.999). (4) Conclusions: The IOTA-ADNEX model is equal to gynecologic US experts in excluding benign ovarian tumors. Subsequently, being familiar with this US software may help gynecologic beginners to reduce unnecessary surgery.

摘要

(1) 背景:本研究旨在比较IOTA-ADNEX(国际卵巢肿瘤分析——附件区不同肿瘤的评估)模型与妇科专家在鉴别卵巢疾病方面的能力。(2) 方法:本前瞻性研究的所有参与者均接受了配备IOTA-ADNEX模型的超声检查(US)以及超声专家的主观评估。还生成了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以比较总体准确性。计算了ADNEX模型排除良性疾病的最佳截断值。(3) 结果:59名参与者符合条件:分别有54名和5名接受了手术及后续计算机断层扫描(CT)检查。分别在49名(83.1%)和10名(16.9%)参与者中确诊为良性和恶性疾病。ADNEX模型在所有参与者中的特异性为0.816(95%置信区间(CI):0.680 - 0.912),在手术组中为0.795(95%CI,0.647 - 0.902)。ADNEX模型的ROC曲线下面积(0.924)与主观评估的面积(所有参与者中为0.953,手术组中为0.951;所有参与者中P = 0.391,手术组中P = 0.407)无显著差异。使用ADNEX模型的最佳截断点为47.3%,特异性为0.977(95%CI:0.880 - 0.999)。(4) 结论:IOTA-ADNEX模型在排除良性卵巢肿瘤方面与妇科超声专家相当。因此,熟悉该超声软件可能有助于妇科新手减少不必要的手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e4/7356034/aaa821334548/jcm-09-02010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e4/7356034/9d48bf35fd40/jcm-09-02010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e4/7356034/aaa821334548/jcm-09-02010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e4/7356034/9d48bf35fd40/jcm-09-02010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e4/7356034/aaa821334548/jcm-09-02010-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of IOTA-ADNEX Model in Discriminating Characteristics of Adnexal Masses: A Comparison with Subjective Assessment.IOTA-ADNEX模型在鉴别附件包块特征方面的验证:与主观评估的比较
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 26;9(6):2010. doi: 10.3390/jcm9062010.
2
Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX model: Portuguese multicenter study.前瞻性验证 IOTA 方法对附件包块的分类,以及使用良性描述符和 ADNEX 模型对两步策略的回顾性评估:葡萄牙多中心研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):538-549. doi: 10.1002/uog.27641. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.IOTA ADNEX 模型在中国妇科肿瘤中心评估附件肿块的性能。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;54(6):815-822. doi: 10.1002/uog.20363. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.IOTA简易规则、简易规则风险评估、ADNEX模型和O-RADS在北美女性附件区良恶性病变鉴别中的表现
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;59(5):668-676. doi: 10.1002/uog.24777. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
5
Validation of ADNEX and IOTA two-step strategy and estimation of risk of complications during follow-up of adnexal masses in low-risk population.验证 ADNEX 和 IOTA 两步策略,并估计低危人群附件包块随访期间并发症的风险。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;64(3):395-404. doi: 10.1002/uog.27642. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
6
Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.附件包块恶性风险评估:ADNEX模型的外部验证及与其他常用超声方法的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):784-792. doi: 10.1002/uog.17225.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.基于超声的风险模型在区分美国队列中良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤的诊断性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323289. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23289.
8
Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.在有乳腺癌病史的患者中,对附件包块的评估采用主观评估和 IOTA ADNEX 模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):594-602. doi: 10.1002/uog.26253.
9
Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.IOTA 简单规则、IOTA ADNEX 模型、RMI 和术前附件肿块评估的主观评估对准确性的影响:一家三级保健转诊医院的经验。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023;88(2):116-122. doi: 10.1159/000529355. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
10
Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model.两步策略优化大学医院附件包块的术前分类,使用国际卵巢肿瘤分析模型:简单规则和附件模型中不同肿瘤的评估。
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Feb;41(2):471-482. doi: 10.1002/jum.15728. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in artificial intelligence for ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.人工智能在卵巢癌超声诊断中的进展:一项全面综述。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 12;15:1581157. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1581157. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of ADNEX Model with GI-RADS Ultrasound Scoring System in Evaluation of Adnexal Mass.ADNEX模型与GI-RADS超声评分系统在附件包块评估中的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Apr;75(Suppl 1):86-92. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-02000-9. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
3
Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Ovarian Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) With IOTA Simple Rules and ADNEX Model for Classifying Adnexal Masses: A Head-To-Head Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
[Borderline Ovarian Tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Imaging].[卵巢交界性肿瘤:CNGOF临床实践指南-影像学]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Mar;48(3):260-276. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018.卵巢癌统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):284-296. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456. Epub 2018 May 29.
3
Ovarian mass-differentiating benign from malignant: the value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ultrasound rules.卵巢肿块:鉴别良恶性——国际卵巢肿瘤分析超声规则的价值
卵巢附件报告数据系统(O-RADS)与IOTA简单规则及ADNEX模型对附件包块进行分类的诊断性能比较:一项直接对比的Meta分析
J Clin Ultrasound. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1002/jcu.24048.
4
ECO-SCORE: Development of a New Ultrasound Score for the Study of Cystic and Solid-Cystic Adnexal Masses Based on Imaging Characteristics.ECO评分:基于影像学特征开发一种用于研究囊性及实性-囊性附件包块的新型超声评分系统。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 29;13(2):317. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020317.
5
Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) predictive models in preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal lesions: preliminary outcomes in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Greece.国际卵巢肿瘤分析(IOTA)预测模型在术前鉴别附件良恶性病变中的表现:希腊一家三级护理医院的初步结果
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;311(1):113-122. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07859-7. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
6
Analysis of Diagnostic Efficacy of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX Model and the ACR O-RADS US (Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System) for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors: A Retrospective Study in a Tumor Center in Northeast China.国际卵巢肿瘤分析ADNEX模型与美国放射学会O-RADS US(卵巢附件报告和数据系统)对卵巢良恶性肿瘤的诊断效能分析:中国东北地区某肿瘤中心的回顾性研究
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Feb;38(1):410-421. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01170-2. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
7
ADNEX risk prediction model for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies.用于诊断卵巢癌的ADNEX风险预测模型:外部验证研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Med. 2024 Feb 17;3(1):e000817. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000817. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective study.附件包块中国际卵巢肿瘤分析ADNEX模型和卵巢附件报告与数据系统与最终组织学诊断的比较:一项回顾性研究
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Jan;67(1):86-93. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23061. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
9
Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.超声评分(主观评估、简单规则风险评估、ADNEX模型、O-RADS)在分类困难的附件包块中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;13(17):2785. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172785.
10
Evaluation of IOTA-ADNEX Model and Simple Rules for Identifying Adnexal Masses by Operators with Varying Levels of Expertise: A Single-Center Diagnostic Accuracy Study.评估IOTA-ADNEX模型及不同专业水平操作者识别附件包块的简单规则:一项单中心诊断准确性研究。
Ultrasound Int Open. 2023 Aug 23;9(1):E11-E17. doi: 10.1055/a-2044-2855. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):652-660. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
4
Clinical Utility of Risk Models to Refer Patients with Adnexal Masses to Specialized Oncology Care: Multicenter External Validation Using Decision Curve Analysis.附件包块患者转至肿瘤专科治疗的风险模型的临床实用性:使用决策曲线分析的多中心外部验证。
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5082-5090. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3248. Epub 2017 May 16.
5
Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.附件包块恶性风险评估:ADNEX模型的外部验证及与其他常用超声方法的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):784-792. doi: 10.1002/uog.17225.
6
Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model: a multicentre external validation study.使用ADNEX模型在手术前评估卵巢癌风险:一项多中心外部验证研究。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Aug 23;115(5):542-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.227. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
External validation of the IOTA ADNEX model performed by two independent gynecologic centers.由两个独立的妇科中心进行的 IOTA ADNEX 模型的外部验证。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Sep;142(3):490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
8
Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.IOTA ADNEX模型在妇科肿瘤中心术前鉴别附件包块中的表现
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):778-783. doi: 10.1002/uog.15963. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.主观评估与超声模型诊断卵巢癌:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Cancer. 2016 May;58:17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
10
The Role of CA 125 as Tumor Marker: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects.CA 125作为肿瘤标志物的作用:生化及临床方面
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;867:229-44. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_14.