• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饮食质量与结直肠癌风险的系统评价和荟萃分析:现有证据质量是否足以制定相关建议?

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diet quality and colorectal cancer risk: is the evidence of sufficient quality to develop recommendations?

作者信息

Moazzen Sara, van der Sloot Kimberley W J, Bock Geertruida H de, Alizadeh Behrooz Z

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(16):2773-2782. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1786353. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1080/10408398.2020.1786353
PMID:32613845
Abstract

The quality of existing evidence about the impact of diet quality on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk has only rarely been assessed. In the current review, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and the resulting references (up to January 2020) for studies that evaluated the role of high diet quality by extreme dietary index categorization and the risk of CRC. Two researchers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. We then applied a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CRC at the extremes of each dietary index, and we assessed the quality of the pooled results using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A high diet quality was significantly associated with reduced CRC risk when patients had a low Diet Inflammatory Index score (OR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.56-0.78), a high Mediterranean Diet Score (OR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.78-0.90), high Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension adherence (OR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.78-0.89), and a high Healthy Eating Index score (OR, 0.72; 95%CI, 0.64-0.80). The pooled results for all dietary indices were rated as being of low quality due to concerns over inconsistency or imprecision. We conclude that, despite a high diet quality appearing to have a preventive role in CRC, the evidence is currently of insufficient quality to develop dietary recommendations.

摘要

关于饮食质量对结直肠癌(CRC)风险影响的现有证据质量很少得到评估。在当前的综述中,我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane以及所得参考文献(截至2020年1月),以查找通过极端饮食指数分类评估高饮食质量作用及CRC风险的研究。两名研究人员独立进行研究筛选、数据提取和质量评估。然后,我们应用随机效应荟萃分析来估计每个饮食指数极端情况下CRC的合并优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),并使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法评估合并结果的质量。当患者的饮食炎症指数得分较低(OR,0.66;95%CI,0.56 - 0.78)、地中海饮食得分较高(OR,0.84;95%CI,0.78 - 0.90)、高血压饮食预防法依从性较高(OR,0.83;95%CI,0.78 - 0.89)以及健康饮食指数得分较高(OR,0.72;95%CI,0.64 - 0.80)时,高饮食质量与CRC风险降低显著相关。由于担心不一致性或不精确性,所有饮食指数的合并结果被评为低质量。我们得出结论,尽管高饮食质量似乎对CRC有预防作用,但目前证据质量不足以制定饮食建议。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diet quality and colorectal cancer risk: is the evidence of sufficient quality to develop recommendations?饮食质量与结直肠癌风险的系统评价和荟萃分析:现有证据质量是否足以制定相关建议?
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(16):2773-2782. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1786353. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Diet Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Score, and Health Outcomes: A Second Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.基于健康饮食指数、替代健康饮食指数、停止高血压的膳食方法评分和健康结果评估的饮食质量:一项队列研究系统评价和荟萃分析的第二次更新。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Dec;120(12):1998-2031.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.076. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
Adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern reduces the risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.遵循高血压饮食防治计划(DASH)饮食模式可降低结直肠癌风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Oct;39(10):2975-2981. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Diet quality as assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score, and health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.通过健康饮食指数、替代健康饮食指数、终止高血压膳食方法评分评估的饮食质量与健康结局:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 May;115(5):780-800.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
5
Diet Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Score, and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.基于健康饮食指数、替代健康饮食指数、停止高血压膳食方法评分和健康结果评估的饮食质量:一项更新的队列研究系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jan;118(1):74-100.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
6
Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality.饮食质量与上消化道癌症风险:荟萃分析与证据质量评估。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 23;12(6):1863. doi: 10.3390/nu12061863.
7
Healthy Eating Index-2010 and Mediterranean-Style Dietary Pattern Score and the risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma: a case-control study.健康饮食指数-2010 及地中海饮食模式评分与结直肠癌和腺瘤风险的关系:一项病例对照研究。
Nutr Cancer. 2020;72(8):1326-1335. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1683212. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
8
Healthy Eating and Mortality among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.健康饮食与乳腺癌幸存者的死亡率:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7579. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137579.
9
Healthy dietary indices and risk of depressive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.健康饮食指数与抑郁结局风险:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;24(7):965-986. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0237-8. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
The Association of Dietary Quality Indices and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.膳食质量指数与癌症死亡率的关联:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Cancer. 2018 Oct;70(7):1091-1105. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2018.1502331. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between adhering to a dietary approach to stop hypertension and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.坚持终止高血压饮食法与结直肠癌风险之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 May 6;25(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03859-2.
2
Association of dietary patterns derived by reduced-rank regression with colorectal cancer risk and mortality.基于降秩回归得到的饮食模式与结直肠癌风险和死亡率的相关性研究。
Eur J Nutr. 2024 Nov 28;64(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03513-9.
3
The association between non- and pro-healthy diet indices and the risk of colorectal cancer: a case-control study.
非健康饮食指数和健康饮食指数与结直肠癌风险的关联:病例对照研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03520-4.
4
The association between Planetary Health Diet Index and the risk of colorectal cancer: a case-control study.行星健康饮食指数与结直肠癌风险的关联:病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 3;14(1):26546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78197-6.
5
Diet and physical activity advice for colorectal cancer survivors: critical synthesis of public-facing guidance.结直肠癌幸存者的饮食和身体活动建议:面向公众的指导意见的批判性综合。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 22;32(9):609. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08797-5.
6
Association between diet quality and ovarian cancer risk and survival.饮食质量与卵巢癌风险和生存的关联。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jul 1;116(7):1095-1104. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae040.
7
Identification of Key MicroRNAs and Genes between Colorectal Adenoma and Colorectal Cancer via Deep Learning on GEO Databases and Bioinformatics.基于 GEO 数据库和生物信息学的深度学习鉴定结直肠腺瘤和结直肠癌的关键 microRNAs 和基因
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2023 Feb 5;2023:6457152. doi: 10.1155/2023/6457152. eCollection 2023.
8
Dietary patterns and risk of colorectal cancer: a comparative analysis.饮食模式与结直肠癌风险:比较分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):96-106. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac230.
9
Diet quality indices and gastrointestinal cancer risk: results from the Lifelines study.膳食质量指数与胃肠道癌症风险:来自 Lifelines 研究的结果。
Eur J Nutr. 2022 Feb;61(1):317-327. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02648-3. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
10
Dietary Inflammatory Index and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies.饮食炎症指数与健康结局:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状综述
Front Nutr. 2021 May 19;8:647122. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.647122. eCollection 2021.